Marxist Criticism Of The Great Gatsby Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
721
Cite

Gatsby Marx and the Great Gatsby

In the 1920s, the United States was enjoyed a new and unprecedented period of industriousness and growth. Within this period, its advancement as a production society would seen one of its most torrid phases of expansion. But just as this time would prove the economic merits of capitalism, it would begin to demonstrate the considerable dangers that also accompany this system. This dichotomy is captured best in F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 masterpiece, The Great Gatsby. In the title character and his surrounding culture, we are given a compelling critique of the materialism and inequality which are the ultimate ends of capitalist greed. Approaching the text through the lens of social theorist Karl Marx, one comes face-to-face with the culturally, socially and ethically destructive mores of unrestrained capitalism.

We initiate the discussion with a perspective offered by Marx. The innovator of Communism warned that in any production-based society, there is a fine line between the achievement of economic prolificacy for the greater good and the exploitation of production labor for the enrichment of the select few. Unfortunately,...

...

According to Trainer (2010), "At first the relation between new forces of production and new relations of production is progressive or beneficial to society in general. Marx stressed the great increase in human welfare that economic growth under capitalism had brought. However as time goes on the situation becomes less and less beneficial. The new social relations of production begin to hinder the full development and application of the new forces of production." (p. 1)
This denotes that in the eventuality, capitalist growth produces less in the way of economic progress and more in the way of the individual acquisition for the wealthy elite. These wealthy elite drive the action and thematic impulses of The Great Gatsby, especially in the old money society where the self-made bootlegger attempts to gain acceptance. Daisy is a particularly demonstrative figure, a lazy socialite with tremendous personal wealth and little sense of the society around her. On this point, Gatsby observes that Daisy's…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited:

Fitzgerald, F. Scott. (1925). The Great Gatsby. The Scribner Classic Library.

Trainer, T. (2010). Marxist Theory: A Brief Introduction. Social Sciences.


Cite this Document:

"Marxist Criticism Of The Great Gatsby" (2013, September 16) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/marxist-criticism-of-the-great-gatsby-96423

"Marxist Criticism Of The Great Gatsby" 16 September 2013. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/marxist-criticism-of-the-great-gatsby-96423>

"Marxist Criticism Of The Great Gatsby", 16 September 2013, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/marxist-criticism-of-the-great-gatsby-96423

Related Documents

Great Gatsby -- a Theoretical Analysis The Great Gatsby is one of the legendary novels written in the history of American literature. The novel intends to shed light on the failure of American dream that poor can attain whatever he wants and emphasizes on the hardships presented by the strong forces of social segregation. In order to understand this novel, there are various theories which tend to be helpful in order

In the car Nick sees him look sideways as though lying and thinks "And with this doubt, his whole statement fell to pieces, and I wondered if there wasn't something a little sinister about him, after all" (65, Chapter 4). Nick's middle class ideology leads him to scorn those who would strive to get ahead. It is the traditional view of the underclass toward upstarts from within. In the

Great Gatsby: As Seen Through Marxist Perspective A Marxist perspective of F. Scott Fitzgerald's famous novel, The Great Gatsby may be interested in social class representations, together with how characters acquired and retained riches and power. An overall analysis of the novel reveals that it portrays the extremely rich social class that does not work and devotes most of its day to leisure activities primarily. A few less rich minor