PTSD Resilience & Treatment In this section, two objectives are addressed: the methodology that has been used in this work is explained and secondly, the reasons for choosing this particular methodology are offered. To aid explanation of the premises, eight headings have been identified as under:

Research philosophy;

Time horizons and research type;

Sample Description;

Data Quality issues; and The eight headings will make it easier to understand the logic behind the study itself as well as the aims of the subject chosen easier and hence to carry through the course of the methods adopted. Segmentation also aids the process of looking at percepts and pragmatic considerations (Cohen, Manion and Morrison, 2007).

Research Philosophy

The three mainline thoughts followed in research processes are those of Analytical, Positive, and Pragmatic. (Saunders et al., 2012).

PTSD is a very complex phenomenon and unique to each individual, though groups can be formed based on universal occurrences across demography's and situations. The right approach hence would be interpretive or Analytical rather than Positive or Pragmatic. Different types of situations can manifest in the trauma that people face as a result of the differences in situations that they actually face or even perceive. PTSD patients have also been known to carry hereditary, sociological, or circumstantial experiences and characteristics that result in the traumatic conditions that they find themselves in. It is not only important to the analyze the specific cause that created stress in the individual, but also to the factors leading to development of the personality that succumbed mentally or psychologically to the situation. That explanation, looked at from all possible angles, may offer a clue to the behavioral shifts that the individual exhibits, and which are generally socially unacceptable causing negative aspersions on character of the individual (Saunders et al., 2012), face a very difficult time in adjusting to even the most mundane tasks at times and as such it is a better strategy to allow time and non-intrusive therapies to bring back the patients as close to the mainstream as possible. Saunders (2012) emphasizes that certain situations cannot be anticipated and situations that were in the background, causing the ultimate breakdown may continue to persist. This may well be in most cases out of the control of the individual. As a result, the methodology in this work chooses to combine the virtues of analytical and well as realist approach.

Research Approach

In the present work two lines of approaches will be encountered, those of Inductive ( wherein an assumed hypothesis is weighed against the data obtained for substantiating or negating the theoretical premise and the Deductive approach, that interprets the data collected to arrive at a hypothesis to address the situation, problem, or phenomenon. Both the approaches can be followed in a variety of ways and the approaches followed can vary for different situations being studied or outcomes sought. Generalizations of outcomes from data garnered is not always a feasible outcome according to one school of thought which is in direct disagreement to the notion of many scholars that hold the exactly opposing view that such generalizations are always possible if data supports the theory (Saunders et al., 2012).

As discussed, the object of this work is to use ascertain precepts and constructs that would address the PTSD patients and their afflictions in behavioral attributes of various classes arising out of exposure to different situations and enable them to acclimatize to normative behavior and hence enjoy a socially healthy life. This theoretical and practical framework is sought to be built by the deductive approach that configure data collected to arrive at a theoretical premise. The whole idea of deductive theory is to assess the agreement of the theory proposed to the statistical data collected by way of responses in actual life cases. In present times, we are living in a strife-ridden era. The strife's are not well defined nor are they constricted to a particular cause or origin. They are also much different in nature and reach to what may have existed only a few generations ago. In as much as the trauma that people face have been thought to be hereditary, those causes that initially caused trauma have all but disappeared, but the effects can be seen generations after the transformation in societal construct. This causes the introduction of inductive theory towards finding a solution for the PTSD patients. The other reason why inductive approach is being sought is that the older philosophies that effectively took on PTSD patients are rapidly proving inadequate in countering the present...

The surveys that will hence be carried out will have a two-fold objective. The first one will be that it will accept or reject the deductive philosophy and the second one will be that of inductive approach. The inductive premises will be applied to the data accumulated and tested for the best-fit response. Thus, in this work, both approaches will be used to arrive at the solutions for PTSD patients help align with socially acceptable behavioral attributes.
This work, which aims to add the results of this work to the existing literature on methods and ways to offer corrective rehabilitation procedures for PTSD patients, will hence make use of both the approaches, deductive as well as inductive.

Research Strategy

The construct of this work seeks to present the theory used for the objective of the problem sought to be addressed through dissemination of the data collected and theologies visited in the literature review. Thus authenticating the direction adopted for reaching the objective of the research work. As such, the data collection strategies will be verified, based on the theories visited and complement them (Saunders et al., 2012). Inductive and deductive approaches, when used in tandem are best served by survey methods of data and theoretical response collection. The main advantage of this method is that most reliable, objective and subjective information can be obtained from the patients and first-line affected persons directly. The method or approach of surveys can be actualized in two ways primarily: the First being a well designed yet flexible Interview framework keeping in mind the information to be sought along with certain other unforeseen parameters that may arise, and Secondly the Questionnaire that may also serve the purpose of data and statistical analysis for any further work that may be sought (Trochim, 2006). In keeping with the vista of the problem sought for this work, following the observations of Trochim, (2006), Interview is a better approach as it encompasses all unknown dimensions that may provide deeper insight into the apparent problems and hence offer a better background for arriving at solutions to the malady. In this work hence, the approach of conducting face-to-face interviews has been adopted for collecting information on which the theories will be applied.

Time Horizons and Research Type

In trying to arrive at a solution for those in traumatic condition and impaired social and normative personal behavior, the chief concern is that of the effect such behavior has on the societal and familial construct. The stressors can present themselves in a variety of forms even after the causal happening has ceased. It has been observed that avoidance of problem/threat is one of the ways used by the patients and maintain a sort of decorum in their social connect. The societal role in helping the affected gain stability and overcome behavioral anomalies or adapt to recurrence hence needs to be investigated. An interview based along the lines of situational effects is known as cross -- sectional study and the interview pattern attempted in this research is hence a cross-sectional study (Saunders et al., 2012).

The basic nature of this study in inquisitive and enquiry based that seeks as much subject matter and response in explanatory or causative form as possible and instance-based liberty is availed by the interviewer to get the most comprehensive information that can then be subjected to the inductive and deductive theories and arrive at the most applicable and suitable solutions of the concern of this research work. This form of open ended interviewing is not only suitable for this study, it is also important, as many dimensions of this problem, being mental and psychological in nature basically, may not have been uncovered as yet (Saunders et al., 2012). Since no strict rules are set in these types of interviews, they have often been alleged to be directionless and unrestricted unlike the strict codes of discipline that research work needs to adhere to conventionally. However, the elaborate interviews serve the purpose of seeing the problems in a new and often better light and make arriving at solutions easier (Saunders, 2012).

Data Collection Methods

In the qualitative approach pursued by researchers, all aspects of the social construct; its tenets, traditional values, and practices are encompassed. (Bouma, 2010).

A researcher delving into qualitative aspects of a work presumes the effect of various parameters on the individual under investigation to seek the real cause and effect relationships exhibited by the…