Moral Dilemma Anyone Who Know Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
709
Cite

Seeing how the Prime Directive should no longer apply, Picard was free to do whatever was necessary in order to save his crewman. However, the advanced technology employed by the aliens forced Picard to argue for the life of Wesley Crusher. His argument centers around the idea that this conflict is over whether or not moral universalism, or moral relativism would apply in the case of Wesley Crusher. Picard argues that the Federation does not interfere with other cultures because they believe that all cultures have equally value and the capacity for development. However, they are dealing with an alien race that is violating that principle. The aliens have decided that their moral universalism is correct for the Edo, and by extension, anyone who visits their planet. But Picard argues, correctly, that each culture must respect the rights of other cultures to develop in their own way. And the Prime Directive would seem to indicate...

...

They had not developed independently, or naturally, and were the pawns of an advanced alien race. Therefore, Picard was correct not to allow Wesley Crusher to be executed; the Prime Directive did not apply, nor did the rules imposed on the Edo by the aliens. The aliens were violating the rights of the Edo to develop naturally, and the Enterprise, according to the application of moral relativism to the Federation, would have been correct in attempting anything they could to not only help Wesley to escape, but to stop the interference of the Edo by the advanced alien race.

Cite this Document:

"Moral Dilemma Anyone Who Know" (2012, April 30) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moral-dilemma-anyone-who-know-57010

"Moral Dilemma Anyone Who Know" 30 April 2012. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moral-dilemma-anyone-who-know-57010>

"Moral Dilemma Anyone Who Know", 30 April 2012, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/moral-dilemma-anyone-who-know-57010

Related Documents

Moral and Emotional Responses to the Challenge of Thrasymachus Might makes right. So suggests the character of Thrasymachus in Plato's "Republic." In other words, justice and morality is merely defined by who is stronger. The proper role of morality in both reason and the emotions is dependant simply upon what one wants to do, at that point in time, and how one can best achieve one's objective. In politics, the strongest

Charlotte's Web: Field Research, Psycho-Social Research, and a Textual Summary and Analysis Introduction and Field Research Background My niece Ariel, age 11, agreed to read Charlotte's Web by E.B. White with me, and to be my informant on this project (Shapiro, "Personal Interview"). Ariel is extremely bright (IQ over 140), and has already finished the 7th grade, having skipped second grade in elementary school (I bring this up not so much to

Moral Questions and Moral Theory: Organ Donation The issue of organ donation seems as though it would be simple. When a person dies, he or she no longer needs organs and those organs could be used to save the life of someone else (Appel, 2005). However, the issue is not as black and white as that for many people. Some are very against organ donation because they do not believe in

The line of legitimacy, separating socially approvable use of force from violence, cannot be effectively drawn without an agreement on what constitutes the optimum amount of force necessary to maintain social order and to protect human rights against encroachment. A society subscribing to infinite morality which condemns all use of force as immoral is doomed no less than a society accepting the absolute pragmatism of tyrants. " As Oleg Zinam

If the account does this it has exhausted what matters to the person in constructing the agent's well-being. Thus a person could not care about anything beyond the extent to which it serves her interests. Self-sacrifice would be impossible." (Sobel, 1998) But, I understand that it is important to know going in that our healthcare system and all the world around us is in a state of constant change. As

His team mates attest to the beating incident as unique and isolated and would rather not dwell in it. It also occurred because no sufficiently open relationship has been established between Victor and Tom, which could have avoided the aggressive act and Tom's insubordination. Nevertheless, Victor realizes his duty to remedy the situation and offers to indemnify Tom for the injury right the next day. Tom realizes his own