Volkswagen's Performance And Organizational Structure
Volkswagen's growth over the past three decades has been a roller coaster characterized by numerous ups and downs. In 2002, the company hired Bernd Pischetsrieder, the former BMW boss to help fix its problems. While the new boss developed strategies towards promoting Volkswagen's growth, the well established plans usually go astray. The company's poor performance is evident in the fact that is share price has decline with approximately 50% whereas its profits decreased by 36%. In addition, more than 50% of Volkswagen's 100 managers are not used to making decisions on their own. This is an indication of the huge problems at Volkswagen, which also requires changes in its organizational structure.
Volkswagen's Recent Performance
The decline in the company's share price and profits as well as a seemingly ineffective organizational structure at Volkswagen is an indication of the numerous problems it currently faces across all its operations. First, the firm's customers have decided that it would have to add more value to their money if they have to retain loyalty. This is influenced by the fact that Volkswagen has traditionally charged more for its products due to innovation, quality, and an indirect lifetime guarantee. The other factors include loss of competitive advantage to GM, declined sales in China's booming market, ineffective cost-cutting measures, and labor pains.
In the past few years, Volkswagen has experienced fortunes and misfortunes in its growth and productivity. According to Team (2014), Volkswagen experienced an increase in production by 4.2% i.e. 10.14 million cars though this was still lower than the 10.23 million cars sold by Toyota. The firm's own-branded passenger vehicle also experienced slight growth and accounted for a huge 60% of all volumes sold by Volkswagen during this financial year. This represented 1.6% growth, which slowed down the company's profitability, though demonstrated its recent growth as compared to the previous years. Despite being seemingly unable to gain from the increase in automotive demand in the United States since 2006, the company registered some gains on positive currency translations. These slight gains emerged from the fact that the U.S. dollar was appreciating against the euro. Over the last two to three years, Volkswagen slightly growth has been brought by an increase in sales for its luxury divisions i.e. Bentley, Audi, and Porsche. These divisions have not only accounted for 40% of net revenues but also resulted in nearly 75% of Volkswagen's net operating profits (Team, 2014).
However, the misfortunes during this period include declined growth characterized by declining share price. In the United States, Volkswagen's own-branded passenger cars declined by approximately 10% regardless of the growth in demand for vehicles throughout the country. In the last quarter of last year, the company's stock was more than 50% below its 52-week high it registered in the first-quarter of the year (La Monica, 2015). The other misfortunes are poor brand reputation and tension among Volkswagen's other managers.
Volkswagen's Organizational Structure
The organizational culture at Volkswagen has been characterized by change-resistant bureaucracy, which has contributed to ineffectiveness of some management approaches such as consensus management techniques. The company has a bureaucratic organizational structure, which is based on standardization and incorporates formalized rules and regulations, centralized authority, highly routine activities that are accomplished through specialization, and grouping of tasks into functional departments. The bureaucratic organizational structure has contributed to authoritarian leadership by some of its managers and Chief Executive Officer. As compared to the organizational structure and culture of some of its major rivals, the current culture and structure at Volkswagen has acted as an obstacle towards the company's growth and profitability in recent years. Similar to many German companies, Volkswagen has two boards i.e. the management board and the supervisory board. The management board under the leadership of the Chief Executive Officer handles the firm's daily operations while the supervisory board is above the management board and is where the CEO reports (Reuters, 2015). The supervisory board has the right to hire and fire members of the management board and must approve major strategic decisions. Despite controlling the CEO, the supervisory board has given him freedom to handle certain issues as long as he achieves desired objectives. Based on this closed-off structure, all decisions at Volkswagen are handled by few senior executives.
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.