Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … multinational command structure with command relationships for a coalition to assist Azerbaijan in defeating the South Azeri People's Army (SAPA) and defending Azerbaijan from attack by Ahurastan from the Independent Province of Ahurastan (IPA). The United States, Turkey and Great Britain have offered to form the nucleus of a coalition in support of major combat operations for EUCOOM JTF East.
Situation
In response to the increased SAPA activity sponsored by the Government of Ahurastan, the Government of Azerbaijan has asked for help from a coalition of the willing in order to defeat the SAPA and deter conventional aggression by Ahurastan. The United Nations, which currently has a mission ongoing in Nagorno-Karabakh, has not yet passed a resolution authorizing the use of force in Azerbaijan. The order of battle for forces provided by the U.S. need to be determined yet in detail. However, U.S. And...
The effective chain of command is presented in Table 2 and Table 3. The key, number one politico-military issue will be to develop and justify a multinational command structure with command relationships for the coalition to defend Azerbaijan builds upon and plugs national forces into EUCOM JTF East while maintaining as much coalition nation pride and autonomy as possible.
Recommendation-Due to the sensitive position of Azerbaijan vis a vis Muslim neighbors and the Christian nations of Armenia and Georgia, a parallel command structure is imperative. Of lesser, but an important concern is the reaction of Russia to the crisis brewing on its doorstep. This is especially so in the case of Muslim Azerbaijan to avoid antagonizing its Muslim populations or neighbors. In the case of Azerbaijan and Georgia, this is the reason that the vast majority…
Constraints-U.S. And CJTF EUCOM EAST forces will need to keep a low profile on Azeri bases. CJTF nations on base should wear UN blue berets and blue helmets when and if the UN security council approves the deployment of MNF forces. Obviously, they will not do this in the field in tactical situations. Readers of this proposal will remember the removal of the U.S. flag from U.S. forces uniforms during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm in 1991 to mollify the Saudis. Also, MNF forces must not mingle with the UN forces in Nagorno-Karabakh due to objections of the Russians. MNF planning meeting at all levels are to include Azeri force representatives and take their needs and considerations into account in mission planning unless to do so jeopardizes mission viability or MNF personnel safety.
Advantages-Politico-military considerations are most benefited by the parallel command structure. The MNF best ensures the approval of the UN Security Council on its operations by maintaining national control by Azerbaijan over its military forces.
Disadvantages-C2 is easier in a situation where there is direct command and control over coalition forces in a
Once this unanimous strategy is reached, a united troop effort will go out. Justification While unconventional, this approach is necessary to ensure the full cooperation and trust of all three forces involved in the operation. There are many constraints placed on the United States in this operation. The primary constraint is the requirement of the other countries that TACON authority be utilized. Second, there has not been an order passed by
Colombia contributed an infantry battalion consisting of 265 personnel." (Multinational Force and Observers: Wikipedia Encyclopedia) Fiji sent an infantry battalion of 329 personnel. France provided 15 personnel to be stationed a Force Headquarters and with fixed wing unit. Hungary provided a Military Police Unit consisting of 41 personnel. Italy contributed the Coastal patrol unit consisting of 75 personnel and 3 ships. New Zealand contributed 27 personnel divided between support battalion
Globalisation has presented business organisations with an opportunity to do business internationally. Today, multinational corporations (MNCs) are prevalent, with many commanding immense power in the global marketplace. Nonetheless, operating in the global scene is usually not a straightforward undertaking. The global business environment presents numerous complexities, which MNCs must effectively deal with if they are to be successful (Noorderhaven and Harzing, 2003). One of the major complexities MNCs face relate to
Logistics on Amazon's Organizational Structure Examine the impact of logistics on an Amazon and how logistics fits into the organizational structure Amazon is one of the multinational corporations with coveted and successful operations on the global market. The Amazon is a lucrative and performing online retailer handling diverse consumer products. The influence and activities done within Amazon are considered to be of global trend in their make and functionalism making it
This is based on both historical precedent and the fact that the firm has started to see year-over-year revenue declines. The company remains highly leveraged and although they are expected to remain liquid, this reality will place some constraints on Adidas. The company is likely to remain in a holding pattern for the next year, awaiting both economic recovery and the two major marketing events in 2010 -- the
Resolution often needs to be imposed from above. A third type of communication problem at firms operating a matrix structure is that of corporate culture clash. In the case of Spectrum, the regional head office may wish to impose upon the different product functions the head office corporate culture. Each of the functional firms, however, may have its own culture and may find that it benefits from certain cultural differences.