Abstract

This paper sought to establish the relationship between teamwork's productivity, job knowledge, the necessary resources to accomplish the task successfully, sick days, and equitable treatment. It highlights how an enterprise's organizational culture is frequently viewed as a requirement for teamwork inside the firm. This is characterized as the shared values, viewpoints, or opinions of workers within the organization. The report also includes descriptive data and numerous regression analyses that were conducted to provide a summary of teamwork levels and productivity. According to Meier et al. (2015), multiple regression is a statistical technique designed to integrate numerous independent variables. Using descriptive data analysis techniques, SPSS was used to analyze the acquired data and display frequency bar charts, scatter plots, and tables. The outcome will have demonstrated a substantial association between employee productivity and levels of teamwork, job knowledge, judgment, fair treatment, and sick days. Additionally, a Pearson correlation revealed that there is a strong, positive relationship between employees' authority to make decisions in the performance of their jobs and their knowledge of how to carry out their job duties.

Introduction

Due to the need for enterprises to gauge their performance, productivity and effectiveness analysis has grown by a significant extent (Choi & Oh, 2020). In this write-up, I'll examine how important factors like fair treatment and teamwork have an impact on how productive employees are at every level of the business. The benefits of teamwork, for instance, have been emphasized frequently (Krner et al., 2015). Productivity growth has been one of the advantages of using teams. It is imperative for businesses to always look for ways to boost internal productivity. Even with limited resources, it would be possible to increase outputs thanks to productivity and efficiency (Ueno, 2012). As a result, evaluating productivity and effectiveness helps firms maintain their competitiveness by comparing their performance to that of their rivals and determining the state of the market (Choi & Oh, 2020). Regression analysis, which determines "whether or not a significant prediction equation was obtained", as Cronk (2020) observes, will be used to analyze the employee productivity in relation to teamwork levels, technical expertise, fair treatment, sick time, and authority to perform a job successfully.

Literature Review

Decision-making in the public and private sectors both depend on knowing how productive each employee is. Firms frequently use specialized performance indicators, such as how different incentives effect employees' behavior, due to a lack of valid techniques to determine workers' productivity (Sauermann, 2016). A number of factors make the level of worker productivity be of interest. One of the many variables that affects how well an enterprise is doing is employee productivity. For instance, the basic definition of work productivity is output per unit of input, such as output per hour of labor. At the workplace, a variety of factors, including the contribution of each worker's productivity, drive work productivity. Regression analysis is a statistical method for analyzing a mathematical model describing the relationship between variables that can be used to anticipate the values of the dependent variable as a result of the values of the independent variables, as Amha and Brhane (2020) indicate.

The detection and characterization of interactions between many components are made easier by regression analysis. Additionally, it supports the estimation of risk scores for individual prediction as well as the identification of prognostically relevant risk factors. Because of this, linear regression is a useful statistical analysis method. Relationship description, estimate, and prognostication are included in its broad range of applications. The method has many uses, but it also has limitations and restrictions that must constantly...…the F (22.936), which determines the statistical significance of the overall predicted 0.01 that there is a statistically significant reject the null hypothesis, and there is a statistically significant association from these independent variables to the number of workdays missed within a year due to illness, fair treatment, job performance, and knowledge.

Additionally, table 8's beta shows a change in knowledge needed to carry out job duties of.267 and a decrease in the degree of fair treatment of workers of -070. Further, the employee's level of decision-making authority while performing the job was 326, showing a connection between knowledge needed to do the job and that level of authority. When performing unrelated tasks, however, employees are empowered to make decisions.

The Shapiro-Wilk table's normality tests reveal that the productivity was (321) = 0.983, p = 0.001. Aside from that, consider the z-score in employee productivity evaluations at .071. Many statistical techniques, specifically parametric tests, require the theory of normality to be verified because it is essential to the validity of these procedures. This analysis's goal is to provide guidance on how to verify for normalcy while performing statistical analysis with SPSS.

Conclusion

In this study's finding, an evaluation was made to establish a range between sufficient authority to carry out the task at hand, teamwork, technical expertise, sick days, and the treatment of the employees in a fair manner. The correlation results also presuppose a positive relationship between the dependent variables, such as employees' authority to make decisions regarding their performance on the job and their knowledge of how to carry out their job duties. Regression uses an equation to express the relationship, whereas correlation measures the strength of the linear link between two variables. The SPSS program was used to evaluate the results with regard to particular company departments…