Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
In conclusion, Wu's arguments are much more convincing than those by Yoo. Wu holds that Network Neutrality is essential for the benefits of its free market platform to continue, especially in the light of end user benefit. Innovation and competition can only be optimized if the market is open to as many as possible new entrants. The removal of Network Neutrality would dramatically reduce the ability of companies to enter the market and of existing companies to optimize their competition. End users would not have as many choices when it comes to the products available, while the lack of competition would also drive prices higher. Removing this in favor of a system that has the potential to create a monopoly of the market by only the largest corporations would surely be a step back from the current free market. I am therefore in agreement with Wu, who holds that Network Neutrality is essential for the continuity of user benefits when it comes to the Internet. Removing this would be nothing short of violating the rights of choice enjoyed by end users.
Network Neutrality is a platform that provides users with optimal choices and competitors with more capability of competition. This is one of the fundamental principles of a
...
References
Cyber Telecom. (2012). Net Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://www.cybertelecom.org/ci/neutral.htm
Free Press (2012). Network Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://www.freepress.net/policy/internet/net_neutrality
Keepin the Internet Neutral?: Time Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate. Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 59, No. 3.
The New York Times (2010, Dec. 22). Net Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/net_neutrality/index.html
Public Knowledge. (2012). Key Issues: Network Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/network-neutrality
Another problem with data discrimination is that search engines like Google might not yield the best information. It is one thing for Google to allow for advertisements in a separate section from search results. It is quite another for Google to only yield search results for paying customers. Some ISPs claim that the consumer would benefit from value-added services to make the Internet faster or more secure. Yet the principle
In this essay about net neutrality, we provide an overview of what net neutrality is and why it is a current political issue. The essay will define net neutrality. Furthermore, it will describe the pros and cons of net neutrality, including reasons that net neutrality is beneficial and ways that it could be detrimental. The essay will discuss the current legal status of net neutrality, as well as the potential future
Net Neutrality: Benefits, Drawbacks, Issues and Concerns The Internet has been such an immense fixture in the lives of most Americans that it is impossible to imagine life without it. The Internet has become an invaluable tool to virtually everyone, and most people can’t imagine functioning without an open, free Internet that is available to everyone. In many ways, the Internet is a tremendous foundational pillar of society and of democracy:
Netflix-Comcast deal has been applauded and criticized in equal measure since its coming into being in February this year. Under the deal, Comcast (an ISP) will connect directly to Netflix's (a content provider) servers, essentially eliminating content delivery networks that often act as middlemen, and consequently, ensuring that Netflix's traffic gets minimum disruption in the broadband network (Woollacott, 2014). So, what exactly does this mean for Comcast's consumers and consumers
Net Neutrality: The Battle Rages onThe Net Neutrality DebateFrom the onset, it would be prudent to note that net neutrality, as Laudon and Laudon (2020) point out, could simply be defined as �the idea that Internet service providers must allow customers equal access to content and applications, regardless of the source or nature of the content� (265). This is more or less the same meaning that Mapua (2016) assigns to
" (Wu) The view opposing non-neutral networks is also articulated by one of the founders of the Internet, Vinton G. Cerf. "Allowing broadband carriers to control what people see and do online would fundamentally undermine the principles that have made the Internet such a success. "(Prepared Statement of Vinton G. Cerf...) While the cable and telephone companies do present some cogent practical and legal points, yet their rationale cannot measure up to