Leadership is associated with motivational, charismatic or transformation styles. An ideal military leader must have a strong intellect, poses physical presence, be professionally competent, be morally upright and act as a good role model. Soldiers usually follow leaders with these characteristics and demonstrate and live the army values and show confidence in any decision with life impact. These leadership styles are both carefully planned and systematic processes with an aim of influencing soldiers to accomplish tasks considering the time frame and method of influence. Any decisions made affect the lives of soldiers and units in both cases. The ultimate goal of these leaders was to meet whatever aim they have, they have to provide guidance to the subordinates to enable them to become winners.
Both tactical and organizational leadership styles have proven to be successful methods to administer authority but the values bring out the differences in the kinds of leadership. Tactical leadership applies the concept of strategy execution. Tactical leaders tend to tackle problems before they actualize by foretelling both the positive and negative outcomes of the problems from the time it begins. Tactical leaders focus on future objectives and work on strategic maneuvers to reach them. In organization leadership, the leader organizes pieces of training for small units that are able to work together and produce the tactical into the operation action. Leaders establish units that instill and create order. A team is in charge of the results that are obtained. Organizational leadership mainly focuses on planning short-term mission for the units. In the military, for example, the leader is not directly in charge of the soldiers.
On the tactical side, there are three aspects to the process which include the leadership role, time frame of making a decision and influence of the leaders. In order to achieve a goal in leadership in the military, of importance is to be in the frontline of the soldiers you lead, you must win their trust and by so doing be unmatched by anyone else. This is important in providing trusted directions, purpose and motivation to the soldiers since other’s assessment of the situations will be ignored. Tactical leaders usually seem to be fully prepared for the end results which is important given they have chaotic motivations and unorganized demands, communication, and structure.
Organizational leadership, on the other hand, the three aspects that are involved include policies procedures and overall organizational mission needs. these leaders promote a full cohesion of soldiers working in unity and in decision making. They have a mission statement that elaborates their intent and are open to feedback. They have to asses such missions that previously took place and borrow from their success before putting the lives of soldiers in the line. They lead soldiers from their own experience and influence them indirectly. Leaders in this category understand their strengths and weaknesses. They are always open to communication besides having a clear intent and vision.
In conclusion, in order to win, there has to be balanced in the leaders which provide the framework to ensure commitment of subordinates and in this case responsibility will be taken for failure.
References.
Adrain, A. L (1997). The Most Important Thing I Know. New York, NY: MJF Books. Accessed from http://jrhs.ccpsnet.net/Reviews/themostimportantthingiknowabout.pdf on 21 August 2018.
Blanchard, K (1999). The Heart of a Leader. Escondido, CA: The Ken Blanchard Companies. Accessed from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3OVglrall-UC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Blanchard,+K+(1999).+The+Heart+of+a+Leader.+Escondido,+CA:+The+Ken+Blanchard+Companies&ots=THGBT-fSQR&sig=1AZAuCkdqqeNU6fLLMADJQ7Vs_Y on 21 August 2018.
Department of the Army. (2006) Field Manual 6-22, Army leadership. Washington, DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Accessed from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiYz4-MyP3cAhUCyRoKHQ2LBasQFjAAegQIABAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.milsci.ucsb.edu%2Fsites%2Fsecure.lsit.ucsb.edu.mili.d7%2Ffiles%2Fsitefiles%2Ffm6_22.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ElSuwFw3zaL7__sg2ydr2 on 21 August 2018.
You’re 100% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.