You have to hand it to America," Pinter explained, "It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good" (Pinter, 2005). He added, cryptically, "It's a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis."
Conclusion
The timing of his book (2003) prevents Kagan from realizing that his narrative on page 88 is incorrect. "There is little cause to believe that the United States will…begin to conduct itself in the world in a fundamentally different manner" than Bush did. Indeed, President Obama has already charted a more democratic course and has reached out to some of the cultures (namely Islam) that Bush relentlessly and ruthlessly attacked with words and bullets. I would enjoy seeing an updated version of Kagan's book, and see if he recognized the huge shift in attitude the new Obama White House has taken towards Europe and the rest of the world.
Works Cited
Delahunty, Robert J., and Yoo, John. 2009. The Bush...
2006. A Doctrine Worthy of the Name?: George W. Bush and The Limits
of Pre-Emption, Pre-Eminence, and Unilateralism. Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 17,
1-29.
Kagan, Robert. 2003. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order.
New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Pinter, Harold. 2005. Art, Truth, and Politics. Nobel Prize Presentation. Retrieved April 11, 2010
From http://www.nobelprize.org.
Ross, Benjamin. 2005. George Bush's Philosophers. Dissent. 52 (3), 96-99.
Sarotte, Mary Elise. 2008. The Worst Allies, Except for All the Others: U.S.-European Relations
In the Age of George W. Bush. International Politics Vol. 45, 310-324.
Swazo, Norman K. 2004. Primacy or World Order? The New Pax Americana. International Journal on World Peace 21…
Kagan Robert Kagan has been described as a "neoconservative historian,"[footnoteRef:1] and yet the commentator's views are more complex than can be squeezed into one phrase. Kagan does exhibit some of the hallmarks of neoconservative ideology, including the continued belief in American exceptionalism, and a willingness to use terms like "new world order."[footnoteRef:2] Kagan vehemently opposes the belief that the American hegemon is declining in status and power, admitting only that the
September 11 and the New Emerging International Order America and Europe in the New World Order This is a paper that outlines the international order in American and Europe in the formation of New World Order. It has 11 sources. As the War in Iraq takes place, and people hope for a quick end to all conflicts around them there is deep thought continuously being given to the emergence of a new
The interview questions will be prepared based on the literature review. Merrian (2006) describes 4. Chapter Structure The dissertations will be divided into five chapters. Chapter-1: Introduction will consist of an introduction of the research issues, problem statement, significance and scope of the research. Chapter 2-Literature Review will be review of the literature relevant to the research topic. The researcher will focus on discussing the conceptual framework or theory for the
Even governments who supported the use of force, most notably Britain, did not support the regime change." Motivating U.S. position, author Robert J. Lieber justifies the preemptive and preventive use of force by the American policymakers: "militant Islamic terrorism plus weapons of mass destruction pose a threat and require us to alter the way we think about the preemptive and even preventive use of force." Supporting the human rights argument
They resort to force to resolve International Disputes quickly. They also have a very 'black and white view of the world' in that they see elements as 'good or bad'; 'friend or enemy'.. It is therefore said that America is living in a Hobbesian state of Anarchy, where freedom can only be protected using brute force and strength (Kagan 2003 p. 4). This has been clearly represented in America's war
There are opinions which consider in fact the invasion of Poland as an excuse for the start of the war. In this sense, the events in 1939 are known to have been an untrue story. More precisely, "Hitler desired war and any further attempts to negotiate peace were doomed to failure. The Nazis then staged a fake attack on a German radio outpost along the German-Polish border and used that