Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Two of the most effective assessments of literacy skills include writing portfolios, and peer- and self-assessments. Peer and self-assessments are student-led practices, which have been liked with measurable improvements in core skills development in writing, as well as increased accountability in the classroom, increased social interactions, and increased accuracy (Harris & Brown, 2013). Writing portfolios have for decades been a reliable method of assessing writing literacy, capturing a “richer array of what students know and can do” as well as revealing the “processes by which students produce work,” (Arter & Spandel, 1992, p. 36). Both writing portfolios and peer- and self-assessments offer the means for instructors to develop the “careful and rigorous approach” that leads to meaningful and accurate assessments of literacy (Scharf, Elliot, Huey, et al, 2007, p. 462). Writing portfolios and peer- and self-assessments also offer the potential for multifaceted assessments that extend beyond the measurement of core literacy modes, such as by allowing instructors to simultaneously assess information literacy.
Portfolios have become a “buzz word,” requiring a clear definition of what a writing portfolio actually entails (Arter & Spandel, 1992, p. 36). At the very least, a writing portfolio is a collection of the student’s written work. However,...
The writing portfolio should “tell a story,” not in terms of substantive content necessarily but in terms of the student’s own progress or learning journey (Arter & Spandel, 1992, p. 36). In addition to writing samples that fulfill specific assignment instructions, the writing portfolio should ideally include students’ written self-reflections. If writing portfolios are to be integrated into an instructor’s assessment arsenal, then it is best to create clear criteria for evaluation to prevent bias and to ensure consistency. Unfortunately, research reveals that few instructors possess formal training in how to properly implement writing portfolios as an assessment tool (Crusan, Plakans & Gebril, 2016).
Likewise, instructors may be insufficiently trained in how to use peer and self-assessments (Crusan, Plakans & Gebril, 2016; Xu & Carless, 2016). Peer and self-assessments can be some of the most fruitful means of creating a collaborative learning environment, encouraging both cognitive scaffolding and “social-affective support” in the classroom (Xu & Carless, 2016, p. 1082). To improve the methods by which peer and self-assessments take place in classrooms, Harris & Brown (2013) recommend formal student training…
References
Arter, J.A. & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 11(1): 36-44.
Crusan, D., Plakans, L. & Gebril, A. (2016). Writing assessment literacy. Assessing Writing 28(2016): 43-56.
Harris, L.R. & Brown, G.T.L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education 36(2013): 101-111.
Scharf, D., Elliot, N., Huey, H.A. et al (2007). Direct assessment of information literacy using writing portfolios. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33(4): 462-477.
Xu, Y. & Carless, D. (2016). Only true friends could be truly honest. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42(7): 1082-1094.
standardized tests and there is math association with the results. On the other hand informal reading assessments do not have the same formal data requirements and is based more on performance. These two kinds of assessments will be critiqued in this paper. Formal Reading Assessments Parents should know and understand not only why their children are being accessed, but through which process the assessment is being conducted. The more parents are
Standardized tests do not do well in measuring the emerging content standards, and over use of this type of assessment often leads to instruction that stresses only basic knowledge and skills. Although basic skills may be important goals in education, they are often overstressed in an effort to raise standardized test scores. Basic skills and minimum competencies become the main goal of schools and teachers as accountability and minimum
reporting Progress Portfolio assessment is an increasingly popular tool in the field of education, both among programs in primary, tertiary, secondary and higher education. The tool is especially good for tracking progress, as it does not just show the results of a group of work or project it also demonstrates the evolution of thought and learning throughout a series of works. Instead of merely showcasing what the author believes to be
Teaching Portfolio I am a percussion teacher, and I instruct classes of various sizes in a range of drumming techniques. My students a very diverse in terms of ages and backgrounds, and my classes can include up to twelve students. Some classes focus on group forms of percussion, such as drumming circles, which require skills for both individual and group drumming. My teaching gradually evolved from my own practice in percussion
Standardized testing vs. authentic assessment in the elementary and junior high school The role of evaluation is one of the basic issues discussed in education today, which is of main concern. Assessment may be described as a method used to better know the present knowledge that a student has. This means that assessment can be as easy as a teacher's subjective judgment based on a single scrutiny of student performance, or
Com). A devoted practitioner of Peer Review myself, I have found that students grow into the process. The more intelligent appear to latch onto it almost immediately, provided they are matched with students of similar intellectual prowess. As Robert Bly predicted in his book of the same name, we do live in a Sibling Society (p. ix). "Holistic Grading" involves looking at the paper as an entire document instead of distinguishing content