Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
There are people that I share the same views with when it comes to abortion. Through discussions we agreed conclusively to take the stand against abortion. In an event that I miraculously change my mind on the issue it can be quite a challenge to try and convince my audience who we previously shared the same perspective on the issue. The audience can react in varied ways first they might actually not accept that I am the one who has changed my views on the issue .they can ask numerous questions trying to find out if truly I am the one who holds the exact same views which are opposite to the views that I held before. Secondly they would like to know exactly who made me change my mind and hold the views that I am trying to convince them to accept. They would like to know exactly where and how this convincing was done since I was a firm advocator of the exact opposite of what I am trying to convince them to accept. They would like to know the exact words that were used to convince me so that they can see if the words are convincing enough to change the views that I held before.
Incase one finds an audience that is hostile when trying to talk to them there are various techniques that can be used to create interest with the audience without turning...
First one should know the audience and know exactly what their expectations are. When they are speaking the y should ensure that they put across a point using ideas or words that are acceptable with the audience. They should tell the audience what they want to hear and how they want to hear it. They should also use examples and references that the audience can identify with. This will ensure that the audience as though they are part of the ongoing talk and hence they will be welcoming and receptive to whatever the speaker tells them. They should also not be too rigid when it comes to conveying the message they should be free and give room for interaction with the audience. This will ensure that the audience feel comfortable and free with the speaker and hence will get everything the speaker intends them to since they can associate with the speaker comfortably. They should also ensure that they approach the audience politely and in a civilized manner. If any confrontations arise they should ensure that they remain calm. The body language and non-verbal cues that they use should be understood well by the audience. All these will ensure that the hostile audience will remain calm and collected and get all they are intended to get from the speaker.
references that the audience can identify with. This will ensure that the audience as though they are part of the ongoing talk and hence they will be welcoming and receptive to whatever the speaker tells them. They should also not be too rigid when it comes to conveying the message they should be free and give room for interaction with the audience. This will ensure that the audience feel comfortable and free with the speaker and hence will get everything the speaker intends them to since they can associate with the speaker comfortably. They should also ensure that they approach the audience politely and in a civilized manner. If any confrontations arise they should ensure that they remain calm. The body language and non-verbal cues that they use should be understood well by the audience. All these will ensure that the hostile audience will remain calm and collected and get all they are intended to get from the speaker.
It is this selfsame Holy Spirit that will serve to convict within the unbeliever and to work within that individual until that person comes to the point of opening the inner door for the Christ and then urging the same individual forth into fulfilling the 'Great Commission' of spreading Christ to the world. In the fulfillment of this commitment inclusive of "baptizing them in the name of the Father,
A commitment to open-mindedness and humility in respect to theory and practice." (Brodley, 1986) II. COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THEORY The work entitled: "An introduction to Cognitive Therapy & Cognitive Behavioral Approaches" states that: "The central insight of cognitive therapy as originally formulated over three decades ago is that thoughts mediate between stimuli, such as external events, and emotions." (Counselling Resource, nd) it is suggested within this theory that "psychological distress is caused by
defendant entitled to dispute the courts characterization of him or her being a danger to society? A defendant is certainly entitled to dispute the courts characterization of him or her as being dangerous to society. This is so because everyone has the right to a fair trial. This is one of the essentials of the American Constitution. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), in fact, insists that all are presumed
The nature of the Indians' interest is therefore best characterized by its general inalienability, coupled with the fact that the Crown is under an obligation to deal with the land on the Indians' behalf when the interest is surrendered. Any description of Indian title which goes beyond these two features is both unnecessary and potentially misleading." This is significant, because it is showing how Indians have a certain amount
Categorizing Crimes: Criminal law basically classifies crime into various categories that dictates the kind of criminal act, the mental condition, and the extent of punishment. The most common categories of crime are crime against persons, white-collar crimes, and crimes against property. Moreover, crime is further categorized by the selected punishment for the offense such as misdemeanor, felony, and petty misdemeanor. A felony is regarded as the most serious offense that is
Reparations Are Americans of African decent entitled to compensation for the American South's slavery past? Does the American government owe people whose ancestors were slaves reparations in the form of money, land or capitol goods? Many African-Americans and white liberals feel that black Americans are owed something and a movement in this country has been stirring for a while agitating for forced reparations by the U.S. government. (Conyers 2003) This paper