Politics Of War - Kennedy Research Proposal

PAGES
6
WORDS
1888
Cite

Usually, however, he would end up lecturing them about the wisdom of the decisions he had already predetermined. It is interesting to note, that, throughout the war, LBJ actually received far more support from Republicans than he did his own party. In February, 1965, Johnson said to Republican Senate minority leader Everett Dirksen: "I'm getting kicked around by my own party in the Senate and getting my support from your side of the aisle" (Small, at the Water's Edge:).

The Vietnam War and President Nixon

Nixon's policies toward the war can be summed up in two words: politics and secrecy. It was the man, his obsession with secrecy, and his need to successfully seek re-election in 1972 that drove all of his decisions. His domestic poltics and foreign policies were all tied up into those same bundles. His aim was to end the Vietnam War as quickly as possible and obtain "peace with honor" -- for domestic political reasons -- i.e. his re-election.

Far more than Kennedy or Johnson, domestic politics dominated Nixon's thinking as he slowly brought an end to the war. It is not off base to say that domestic politics is the very reason Nixon did want to bring...

...

Telltale Hearts: The Origins and Impact of the Vietnam Antiwar Movement. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995.
Hallin, Daniel. The Uncensored War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989.

Simon, Dennis M. "The War in Vietnam, 1965-1968." August 2002. Southern Methodist University. 26 March 2009 http://faculty.smu.edu/dsimon/Change-Viet2b.html.

Small, Melvin. At the Water's Edge: American Politics and the Vietnam War. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005.

Small, Melvin. Democracy & diplomacy: the impact of domestic politics on U.S. foreign policy, 1789-1994. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1996.

A the term paper is to give a detailed explanation of the impact domestic politics had on the Vietnam war. this may include the anti-war movement, reporting in the press and opponents holding political office. consider the long-term loss of life and regime changes that occurred throughout the region as a result of the U.S. withdrawal.

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Garfinkle, Adam. Telltale Hearts: The Origins and Impact of the Vietnam Antiwar Movement. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995.

Hallin, Daniel. The Uncensored War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989.

Simon, Dennis M. "The War in Vietnam, 1965-1968." August 2002. Southern Methodist University. 26 March 2009 http://faculty.smu.edu/dsimon/Change-Viet2b.html.

Small, Melvin. At the Water's Edge: American Politics and the Vietnam War. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005.


Cite this Document:

"Politics Of War - Kennedy" (2009, March 27) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/politics-of-war-kennedy-23574

"Politics Of War - Kennedy" 27 March 2009. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/politics-of-war-kennedy-23574>

"Politics Of War - Kennedy", 27 March 2009, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/politics-of-war-kennedy-23574

Related Documents
War of the Roses
PAGES 5 WORDS 1770

War of the Roses can be considered to be the bloodiest conflict fought in England to date. Beginning in 1455 and ending in 1487, the conflict was rooted in a struggle between the heirs of King Edward III and King Henry IV, who were divided into the House of Lancaster, represented by a red rose, and the House of York, represented by a white rose, hence, the conflict being commonly

War on Terror Although the rhetoric on the War on Terror has subsided somewhat since Bush left office, terrorism itself remains an unfortunate reality around the world. The War on Terror was largely a propaganda machine, which perpetuated a cultural climate of fear. As Coaty points out in Understanding the War on Terror, fear-mongering is destructive rhetoric. In the end, too much fear-driven crisis leads to uninformed and ill-devised political strategies.

Politics of Violence in Pinter's Late Plays When Harold Pinter received the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2005, he spoke quite directly about the subject of political theatre: Political theatre presents an entirely different set of problems. Sermonising has to be avoided at all cost. Objectivity is essential. The characters must be allowed to breathe their own air. The author cannot confine and constrict them to satisfy his own taste or disposition

V. Summary Point: Your State's Core Foreign Policy Position(s). Estonia as a whole, seeks to maintain its security and promote its national interest through a variety of means. It is now formally part of the European Union, with adoption of the Euro slated for 2011, and it is also a formal and active member of NATO. This allows Estonia to benefit from the technological, economic, and political capital that more powerful

...[p. 41] Reasons may be given, why an Act ought to be repeal'd, and yet obedience must be yielded to it till that repeal takes place. The intent of most colonists, was to create change through the proper channels, as has been described by the Philadelphia congress, as having occurred over the ten years bridging the two previous declarations. A consummate expert on the War of Independence, writing in the early twentieth

25). On the other hand, there is often an assumption on the part of the users that evaluations are "an ivory tower process…too late to be useful, too full of jargon to be understood, too lengthy [to read]…, and too likely to be answering a question quite different from the policy question originally posed" (Ibid). The last user complaint set forth by Chelimsky -- that the question answered is often not