Pre-Post Test Knowledge of Ultrasound

Pre-Post Test Knowledge of Ultrasound Content Knowledge for Sonographers When an investigative research study ins set up on the basis of a pre and post testing situation the investigator is afforded the opportunity not only to determine differences in mean test scores for the before and after criterion but also establish whether or not there exists a relationship between the pre and post test situation. The latter statistical process is known as a correlation study.

In addition the investigator is also able, on an individual participant basis, able to determine wherein each individual places with respect to the average scores on a pre-test basis and on a post-test basis in respect to the group average. This calculation is known as a Z Score. Descriptive Statistics Results Pre-Test Ability to Detect Abnormalities Parameter Value Mean SD SEM Median B. Post-Test Ability to Detect Abnormalities Parameter Value Mean SD SEM Median C.

Mean and Median Graphic Presentation of Differences Between Pre-test and Post-Test Results Conclusion: On the basis of the raw data (i.e., non-statistical significant difference) there appears to be a slight increase in ultrasound content knowledge as result of individuals participating in the academic course. Whether or not the reported difference is statistically significant is not known from a review of the raw data. In addition, the conclusion can be drawn that the variability of ultrasound knowledge is more variable before the course vs. after the course. D.

Statistical Analysis of Raw Data visa via "t" Test Calculation: value and statistical significance: The two-tailed P. value equals 0.0033 By conventional criteria, this difference is considered to be very statistically significant. Confidence interval: The mean of Group One minus Group Two equals -5.694852 95% confidence interval of this difference: From -9.458031 to -1.931672 Intermediate values used in calculations: t = 2.9968 df = 118 standard error of difference = 1.900 Required "t" Value = 1.671 Conclusion: What was seen visa via the raw data presentation was a "slight" difference in ultrasound content knowledge between pre and post instruction.

However, the "t" Test analysis has shown that the differences are statistically significant. A resulting "t" value of 2.9968 far exceeds the required value of 1.671. Therefore, enrolling in a ultrasound class significantly increased the participant's content knowledge level. This is a perfect example how one cannt every draw a conclusion about data from a raw data numerical stance. What might appear not to be so different actually ends I being very, very different. Finally, participating.