Preference Abstract Falls Short APA Standards. (You

¶ … preference abstract falls short APA standards. (You find standards noted APA Publication Manual sections text readings cited week's Resources.) Use questions a guide asses abstract, rewrite abstract: Did author include a reference research study a format consistent APA Publication Manual? Did author mention problem addressed study? The abstract of the research study article titled "The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites" Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe, 2007() falls short of the APA standards guidelines for abstracts in several ways.

One is that the number of words should be between 150 and 200 yet the actual number of words in the abstract is 124. Secondly, the keywords from the research paper should be listed in the abstract. These keywords have not been listed. Third, the abstract should include the topic of the research, research questions, methods, sample or participants, data analysis, results, and conclusions. The abstract of this study contains the research topic which is the relationship between Facebook use and the establishment and maintenance of social capital.

The abstract, however, does not contain the research questions, and methodology of the study. The data analysis, results and conclusions made from the study are mentioned in the abstract. The authors do not mention or include a reference to the research study using a format that is consistent with APA guidelines.

Additionally, the authors do not mention the problem that is addressed within the study which is because the study does not address any problem rather it is trying to find out new information regarding Facebook usage and formation and maintenance of social capital. On the other hand, the authors do mention the central purpose of the study which is that of examining the relationship between Facebook usage and the formation and maintenance of social capital. In the abstract, information about the sample is provided.

The authors mention that the sample is of 282 undergraduate students. However, they do not mention the total population of the study sample and they do not mention who the subjects were and how sampling was done to get the sample for the study. The key results of the study are mentioned in the abstract. The authors state that after running regression analyses on the data, they found that there was a strong relationship between the usage of Facebook and the types of social capital which are 3.

The strongest relationship was between bridging social capital and Facebook usage. The journal article is clearly a report of the research study and is not an essay, opinion paper, typology nor a synthesis of a past research study. The abstract is just one paragraph long and is not longer than 1 double-spaced page. Giving consideration to the above assessment issues, the abstract can be rewritten as below: This study examines the relationship between use of Facebook, a popular online social network site, and the formation and maintenance of social capital.

In addition to assessing bonding and bridging social capital, we explore a dimension of social capital that assesses one's ability to stay connected with members of a previously inhabited community, which we call maintained social capital. The study was conducted by sending email invitations to a random sample of undergraduate students at Michigan State University with.