Advantages and disadvantages of psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy integration

Counseling

THE PROS AND CONS OF PSYCHODYNAMIC-INTERPERSONAL THEORIES AND INTEGRATION

Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Theories are beneficial the field of psychology. Individuals who perceive psychodynamic therapy to be a good fit have floated various factors in support. The discipline seeks to address root causes of psychological complications as compared to CBT. In the end, the advantages include broader-based utilization and longer lasting curative measures. Psychodynamic therapy is one of the good ways of addressing psychosomatic conditions, personality patterns, and general distress or tendencies of repeated difficulties in an individual's work and relationship (Trimboli & Farr, 2000).

The scope of movement into the integration focus is addressed in distinct levels of psychotherapy taking place for decades. However, psychotherapy integration is a traditional way of hampering rivalry and competition in the health sector. The rivalry is traced as far back as the differences arising medical disciplines (Maniacci, 2002). The appropriate frameworks, in this case, allow for the conceptualization of clients problems. The psychoanalysis of application also benefits the various theories created in individual psychology. Therapists claim to have found the best treatment approaches designed to address the challenges of the other therapy systems. Behaviorism has been introduced into the fields of psychoanalysis and behaviorism.

However, there are some cons to Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Theories. Even as psychodynamic therapy is brief, it tends to take more time as compared to CBT. Most people do not perceive psychodynamic therapy to be an appropriate treatment approach. They consider it difficult as it causes variances in accepting the factors away from the awareness influencing the different levels of behaviors and thoughts. Others have been reluctant to address the distinct levels of childhood and relationships that develop along therapy (Trimboli & Farr, 2000). Psychodynamic therapy is also minimally less structured as compared to CBT hence the preference for a more directive and focused approach to CBT.

While developing personalized integrative approaches to therapy, it is important to contact professional help in getting a vision of what is to be done to be useful in treatment. All therapists who are capable professionals have to learn the best ways of reflecting on their therapy experiences. During therapy sessions in respective offices, professionals seek to address clients with whom they work with and discuss their struggles with therapy (Maniacci, 2002). Growth and maturity in treatment are reflected on people's integrations and perceived value during therapy sessions in subsequent meetings.

The approach points out the existing proliferation of the separate counseling methods and theories. Integrative psychotherapy movements are represented through thorough shifts of the prevailing factionalism and competition atmosphere among the psychotherapies and making steps towards cooperation and dialog (Trimboli & Farr, 2000). Practitioners have been able to recognize the inadequacies of the single theory though responsive to clients and varying problems. No group of therapies or individual therapy demonstrates remarkable superior efficacies as compared to other approaches. There is the correlated relationship of success for the explained adequacies of predicted personality, behavioral, or pathological change.