Personal growth through spirituality and emotional transformation after divorce
✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
Personality Analysis
Life History
Like most people, I have experienced ups and downs, highs and lows. The major upheavals in my life have revealed some of the core personality traits that have been with me since childhood. I believe that crisis and stress challenge us, and also bring to light our true selves. However, I also believe strongly in the power of each person to change. I used to have anger management problems and other emotional issues, just like most people. Mainly these problems were related to my not having in place a set of established coping mechanisms in my life. Part of this is related to the culture and upbringing, and part also to personality traits. Yet after I was divorced from a husband of 22 years, it was a shock. I did not feel like myself because my emotions were getting the best of me. Knowing this, I joined support groups and saw a therapist. These tools helped, but only temporarily. I failed to see long-term change until I made a conscientious decision to walk away from negative emotion entirely. This was accomplished in conjunction with spiritual growth and development. I had asked a friend for help, and she suggested I see her pastor. By working with this pastor and praying regularly, I felt empowered to change my cognitions and belief systems. I realized that I could walk away from negative feelings like anger, sadness, and fear. My children also inspired me to be stronger and transform negative emotions into positive actions.
Working on my spiritual growth and development has brought out the true and good nature inside me. I no longer pass by homeless people or ignore people in need. I share the power I have with others, which has strengthened me further. Also, I am taking better care of myself by exercising regularly.
The Biases of Memory
Memory is not fully reliable. Research shows that people are more likely to remember potentially traumatic events than nontraumatic events, arguably due to their emotional content (Lalande, Bonanno & George, 2011). When we remember something, we are recalling not necessarily facts but the context surrounding those facts. We know what that memory does to our patterns of thought now. Thus, if I had a bad experience talking in front of the class in which I was embarrassed as a child, I might retain a fear of public speaking for the rest of my life without even knowing what triggers the fear. Thus, our memories are already skewed in favor of trauma with the ordinary events of daily life more obscure.
There are other reasons why our memories are biased. We never remember something exactly how it occurred, because we are humans and not robots. Memories are skewed in many ways, including the way we perceive ourselves and others (Jussim, 2012). Stereotypes and self-fulfilling prophesies are examples of cognitive foibles related to the biases of memory.
When conducting a retrospective analysis of my personality, I need to be aware that some of my memories are shaped by emotion, trauma, and biased beliefs. It may be helpful to ask other people around me what their perception was, to have someone to corroborate any of the events I recall. Yet even then, other people are sometimes sources of our own biases. Sometimes, our memories were planted there. We believe what our parents told us happened, and thus our memory is our parent's memory and not actually our own.
Even more recent history can lead to biased memories. It may, for example, take me many more years to accurately recall and process the events surrounding my divorce. Similarly, I need to become more aware of how my children's memories are being formed in relation to their identity and their family.
The Science of Psychology
Psychology has struggled somewhat to remain a true social science. To do so, psychology has focused mainly on observable and measurable variables like behavior. Variables that cannot be measured behaviorally may be measured through such things as self-reports. However, human beings are far too complex to reduce psychological principles only to measurable variables. This is why psychology will always remain imperfect as a science. Psychologists do not always discount qualitative measures, anecdotes, and case studies. In fact, such subjective types of evidence are occasionally used to bolster quantitative research. The problem is that any subjective material will be biased and potentially inaccurate. Psychologists have enough to worry about in terms of accuracy and validity in research.
As I use my retrospective analysis of personality, I can easily see why some psychologist avoid using such methods as part of research. Yet I can also recognize the importance of incorporating personal anecdotes and self-reports. Human beings are complex, and have stories to tell. Our lives are not a series of discreet events, but rather, holistic narratives that are more web-like in format than linear. It is critical to remember what all the variables are that comprise a person's value and belief system. Both nature and nurture are important at all times, as we are influenced by what we read and learn about through others. The study of psychology is an exciting one, whether or not the scientific method is being used.
Create your account
- Collins, W.A., Maccoby, E.E., Steinberg, L. & Hetherington, E. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting. American Psychologist 55(2): 218-232.
- Jussim, L. (2012). Social Perception and Social Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Lalande, Kathleen M.; Bonanno, George A. (2011). Retrospective memory bias for the frequency of potentially traumatic events: A prospective study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, Vol 3(2), Jun 2011, 165-170.
- Lewkowitz, D.J. (2011). The biological implausibility of the nature-nurture dichotomy and what it means for the study of infancy. Infancy 16(4): 331-367.
- Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development. Child Development 81(1): 6-22.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.