Public Accountability Work An Assessment Article Review

232). In the final purpose of accountability, where the goal is to enhance the learning capacity and effectiveness of the executive branch, we should realize that what needs to happen in this situation is that public authorities act on feedback about their own performance (Deutsch, 1963; Luhmann, 1966; Behn, 2001 as cited in Bovens et al., 2008). Thus, a good accountability mechanism, from this angle, is one that illustrates how the actor in question is learning and becoming more efficient as a result of the mechanism itself.

References

Anechiarico, F. & Jacobs, F.B. (1996). The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption

Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Aucoin, P. & Heintzman, R. (2000). "The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public

Management Reform." International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 45-55.

Arnull, a. And D. Wincott. (2001). Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Behn, R. (2001). Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution

Press.

Bergman, T. & Damgaard, E. (eds). (2000). Delegation and Accountability in the European

Union. London: Frank Cass.

Bovens, M. (1998). The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex

Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Curtin, D. (2004). Mind the Gap: The Evolving EU Executive and the Constitution, Third Walter

van Gerven Lecture, Leuven. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.

De Bruin, J. (2000). Prestatiemeting in de publieke sector. Utrecht: lemma.

Deutsch, K. (1963). The Nerves of Government. New York: The Free Press.

Dubnick, M. (2005). "Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms." Public Performance and Management Review, 28(3), 376-417.

Edeling, T., Stolting, E., & Wagner, D. (2004). Offentliche Unternehmen Zwischen

Privatwirtschaft und Offentlicher Verwaltung. Wiesbaden:...

...

(2004). "The European Union in the Age of Accountability." Oxford Journal of Legal
Studies, 24(1), 495-515.

Halachmi, a. (2002a). "Performance Measurement: A Look at Some Possible Dysfunctions."

Work Study, 51(5), 230-239.

Halachmi, a. (2002b). "Performance Measurement, Accountability, and Improved

Performance." Public Performance and Management Review, 25(4), 370-374.

Harlow, C. (2002). Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hart, P.'t & Wille, a. (2006). "Living Together, Growing Apart? Politicians and Bureaucrats in the Netherlands." Public Administration, 84(1), 121-146.

Jos, P.H. & Tompkins, M.E. (2004). "The Accountability Paradox in an Age of Reinvention."

Administration and SocietY, 36(3), 255-281.

Luhmann, N. (1966). Theorie der Verwaltungswissenschaft: Bestandsaufnahme und Entwurf.

Koln-Berlin: Grote.

Martin, J. (1997). Changing Accountability Relations: Politics, Consumers and the Market.

Paris: OECD.

Meyer, K. & Shaugnessy, K. (1993). "Organizational Design and the Performance Paradox." In R. Swedberg (ed.), Explorations in Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage.

Mulgan, R. (2002). "Public Accountability of Provider Agencies: the Case of the Australian "

Centrelink." International Journal of Administrative Sciences, 68(1), 45-59.

Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies.

Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Pollitt C., Girre, X, & Lonsdale, J., et al. (1999). Performance or Compliance?: Performance

Audit and Public Management in Five Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pollitt, C. (2003). The Essential Public Manager. London: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.

Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Przeworski, a., Stokes, S., & Manin, B. (eds). (1999). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge:…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Anechiarico, F. & Jacobs, F.B. (1996). The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption

Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Aucoin, P. & Heintzman, R. (2000). "The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public

Management Reform." International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 45-55.


Cite this Document:

"Public Accountability Work An Assessment" (2010, May 12) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/public-accountability-work-an-assessment-2994

"Public Accountability Work An Assessment" 12 May 2010. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/public-accountability-work-an-assessment-2994>

"Public Accountability Work An Assessment", 12 May 2010, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/public-accountability-work-an-assessment-2994

Related Documents

Public Administration and its Analysis This is a paper on the concept and basis of Public Administration and the importance it holds in the field of management. Defining the Breadth and Scope of Public Administration In the early years of public administration was hailed as a strong and positive as a professional force for studying and putting into practice for the improvement and revamping of the administration of the federal, state and

In fact, the No Child Left Behind Act, and other standardized test-based programs are "increasing incentives for school administrators to allow [poorly performing] students to quietly exit the school system ("Negative Implications," 2008). Being a high school drop out in today's society is not easy for these students, many of whom may already be disadvantaged in a variety of means. When they are simply allowed and encouraged to drop

" (Assessing, Selecting, and Implementing Instruments for Government Action, 2007) Questions that must be asked are those as follows: (1) Is the issue one where government can act alone? (2) Is the issue one where external actors can act alone with some influence from government? (3) Is the issue one where a mixed governance approach is required, that is, where government and external actors need to act together? (4) What

The trial lasted seven months and Justice Leland Degrasse rendered his decision, 719 N.Y.S.2d 475 on January 10, 2001, in favor of plaintiffs and ordered the state to ensure that all public schools provide the opportunity for a sound basic education to their students." (Hunter, 2004) Entered, as part of this decision was a "costing-out study as the threshold task in developing a new school funding system." (Hunter, 2004)

Inconsistent evaluation methods between public, private, and charter schools, as well as the ever-present problems with whether or not achievement is actually measured accurately by standardized test scores, are two issues that must be taken into account when evaluating the findings of this report. Despite all of this negative press for charter schools, some studies do appear to show that these schools may be a positive learning atmosphere for students

Public Private Comparator Public Sector Comparator (PSC) in the Public-private partnership (PPP) Process Increased global financial pressures have caused many government entities to cut costs in any way possible. One way is to outsource services or projects to private companies. However, when comparing costs, the public sector frequently bases its cost calculations for a project by omitting certain types of factors. These can include employee benefits, utilities, or total administrative costs. As