Edward Molet, Louis Armstrong, Ellen Talley
Kent Lauderdale
Weekly Reflection Team Bravo
"The federal Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in 1977 prohibits enterprises from obtaining business by paying bribes to foreign political figures and government officials" (Morley, Hadley, & Saulnier, p. 24-32, 2011). "The Act consists of two main provisions. (1) The Department of Justice enforces the anti-bribery provisions of The Act. (2) The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforces the accounting provisions of The Act. Under the act, the prohibition of improper payments occur for three entity types: Payment issuers, domestic concerns (the individuals), and foreign nationals/businesses.
FCPA provisions
The provisions of FCPA require enterprises to identify potential violations of the law, and to identify weaknesses in their internal control and compliance processes. FCPA recommends corporate practice include the development and implementation of stand-alone audit modules for ensuring compliance with anti-corruption practices, and the monitoring of a culture of compliance within corporate subsidiaries and joint venture operations. Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index (CPI) ranks countries by the degree to which corruption is apparent as existing among politicians and public officials" (Morley, et al., 2011).
"Underdeveloped countries have the worst scores on the Corruption Perception Index (CPI). A common myth is FCPA compliance is only a problem in third-world markets. Indeed, FCPA non-compliance is a concern in developing and more transparent markets. A representative example that refutes this myth may observe the number of enforcement actions with business activity in China. Given its economic position in world markets, China is no longer holds third-world status.
Global non-compliance rates
Global FCPA non-compliance rates are on the rise simultaneously with enforcement action. Since 2004, prosecutions, and enforcement action are increasing fivefold. In 2008, SEC, and DOJ penalties and fines for FCPA violations are roughly $2.8 billion and took place against 64 individuals and 36 corporations. A number of the actions against corporations are reaching blockbuster proportions as follows: (a) In December 2008, Siemens, AG, and three subsidiaries pay $1.6 billion in fines to the United and foreign authorities; (b) In February 2009, $402 million in criminal fines and $177 million in disgorged profits submits Kellogg, Brown, and Root for a Nigerian bribery scheme; (c) In February 2010, a ten-plus-year bribery ring in the Middle-East is visible, leaving BAE Systems PLC with $400 million in fines, and (d) In June 2010, Technip S.A. has a $240 million criminal penalty and $98 million in disgorged profits.
You’re 72% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.