Reasoning Skills Fallacy Hunt Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
853
Cite

¶ … Red Herring Argument / Petition Principi: Heard from friend who is supporter of the ancient astronaut theory. She seemed to believe it telling me that that intelligent extraterrestrial beings had almost certainly visited Earth in antiquity and made contact with humans in certain points of our history. This she argued was indicated from certain ancient texts such as the Ramayana that, for instance, has gods and avatars who travel from place to place in flying vehicles, whilst the Book of Genesis, (chapter 6 verses 1 -- 4) mentions "sons of God [who] went to the daughters of humans and had children by them" -- which she, along with others, maintains refers to extra-terrestrials. The Book of Ezekiel too has a description of winged creatures flying in the Chariot of God who looked like humans which indicates that that Ezekiel had seen spaceships.

These arguments -- all spurious -- not resting on evidence are examples of the 'red herring' / petition principia fallacy particularly since the arguer attempts to give the impression that the premises are sufficient evidence.

2. Argument: No True Scotsman.

Lyndon's argument for votes for Blacks -- powerful and moral though it was -- appeals mostly to elements of purity for its support.

Take these...

...

For with a country as with a person, "What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"
Rather than focusing on rational support for why Blacks should vote, Johnson relies on principles of religion, transcendence, and America's supposed greatness as was well as their history. He reminds his listeners that "This was the first nation in the history of the world to be founded with a purpose." He ends with: "Above the pyramid on the great seal of the United States it says -- in Latin -- "God has favored our undertaking."

God will not favor everything that we do. It is rather our duty to divine His will. But I cannot help believing that He truly understands and that He really favors the undertaking that we begin here tonight."

.It seems to me that…

Sources Used in Documents:

This perpetrates a number of fallacies since: (a) has nothing to do with the argument (b) is abusing the other (c) is confusing one with many (Islam is composed of many sects aside of which many Muslims have different ways of practicing their faith.

(Source: Associated Press -- Wed, Dec 5, 2012

Palestinians to UN: Stop 2 big Israeli settlements)


Cite this Document:

"Reasoning Skills Fallacy Hunt" (2012, June 17) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/reasoning-skills-fallacy-hunt-77342

"Reasoning Skills Fallacy Hunt" 17 June 2012. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/reasoning-skills-fallacy-hunt-77342>

"Reasoning Skills Fallacy Hunt", 17 June 2012, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/reasoning-skills-fallacy-hunt-77342

Related Documents

The generalization is not warranted because it is based on an appeal to ignorance argument -- that if we do not know for certain that climate change was involved in a weather event we should assume that it was not involved. Since there are mitigating factors, it is impossible to tell for certain if any one given weather event is caused by climate change, and the evidence commonly presented