Essay Doctorate 3,348 words

Richard Dawkins\' the Selfish Gene Jonathan Kozol\'s

Last reviewed: May 31, 2011 ~17 min read

¶ … Richard Dawkins' the Selfish Gene Jonathan Kozol's Savage Inequalities: Children America's Schools. Plus, read websites: http://www.ou./cls/online/lstd5013/dawkins.shtml http://salmonriver.

Richard Dawkins' "The Selfish Gene"

Jonathan Kozol's "Savage Inequalities: Children America's Schools"

There has recently been much controversy regarding genes, as technology has made it possible for people to make intriguing discoveries regarding the topic and a series of individuals have come up with interesting theories concerning genes. Individuals like Richard Dawkins have gone even further than most of their colleagues and produced revolutionary theories relating to how organisms work as machines having the task of transmitting genes to generations following them, with animal behaviors essentially being caused by genes.

Considering Dawkins' theory, one can gain a better understanding of Jonathan Kazol's book "Savage Inequalities: Children in American Schools," with memes being most likely responsible for the fact that particular groups experience a series of benefits in educational institutes across the U.S.

While Dawkins' book primarily relates to the socio-biologic aspect of the "selfish gene," Kazol focuses chiefly on the social element in schools around America and why certain communities are being harshly discriminated on account of belonging to a particular race or because of their social statute. Dawkins appears to want his readers to understand that humans are not necessarily driven by their interests in performing daily activities, as they are also influenced by genes. Also, even with the fact that genes are dedicated to replicate, they do not think or express any interest in doing otherwise. Their main function is to reproduce, thus meaning that they are devoted to doing so without actually having any self-control.

One of the foremost elements that people have to comprehend in "The Selfish Gene" is the fact that genes are not selfish in the literally sense of the word, as it would be absurd to relate to something that has no power to think as being selfish. Individuals thus have to first understand the significance of the word selfish in order to learn more regarding genes are their purpose.

Genes were practically programmed to act accordingly and their selfishness is not reflected in people's behavior. It is very easy for readers to be initially misled when reading this book, as some are likely to fail to notice the fact that genes simply take on their role when they put across selfishness and that it is very probable for individuals to perform altruistic acts when influenced by their genes. Genes are practically small components of a larger body and they simply complete their mission by being selfish, as it would be impossible for someone to understand how the respective body works just by considering its genes. It is even more difficult to understand how a body works when taking into account humans and the complexity coming along with how they function. Dawkins wants people to be able to differentiate between humans and animals in order for them to understand how humans are capable to act in disagreement with their genes while most animals have trouble doing so. "Lower animals, including the non-human primates, are generally restricted in their behavior to those actions they are genetically programmed to perform" (LSTD 5013 -- Interdisciplinary Studies).

It is because of their intellect that humans have the capability to act against what genes instruct them to do. People learn from their past and are thus able to perform activities that are not characteristic for them, as they can ignore instinct with the purpose of doing whatever they want to. Most people are reluctant to accept that humans are simply another animal species and that it is intellect that differentiates humans from "beasts" (Sherer).

Learned behavior is what differentiates people from animals and from other people. Dawkins referred to this concept by using the term meme, bringing together the Greek word mimeme and the word gene, as he was mainly interested in people relating to memory when hearing this word. "Examples of memes are tunes, ideas, catch-phrases, clothes, fashions, ways of making pots or of building arches" (Dawkins, 192).

Memes are passed on from generation to generation similar to how genes are inherited, and, just as genes, one can say that they exist because people imitate each-other. Whereas people tend to consider that memes are nothing like genes when considering their appearance and their physical existence, it can actually be said that memes are passed over from brain to brain similar to how parasites are physically transported from body to body. The concept of God is one of the best ways to understand memes, considering that most people across time have been influenced to express interest in worshipping the divine. Even with the fact that they did it differently, they practically involved the same basic concepts in generating the role of a god.

Somewhat similar to the concept of God, cultural values are also passed over from generation to generation. Depending on their background, people react differently and evolve differently in the contemporary society.

Community bonds are very strong among individuals and in spite of the fact that present day society appears to have evolved significantly when considering discrimination, it appears that it will be long before people actually come to appreciate individuals belonging to different groups as being equal to themselves or to members of their own group.

Memes are sometimes influenced by how people experience progress and it is possible for certain individuals to express particular interest in assisting members of their own community in favor of wanting to assist persons belonging to other communities.

The U.S. is known for the fact it is presumably one of the freest countries in the world and because Americans are especially interested in promoting values concerning freedom and equality. Kozol's book goes at bringing down most of these beliefs by relating to the American school system and to how it is governed by inequity. According to their social status, to their skin color, and to their background in general, children in a series of schools from around the U.S. receive preferential treatment. One can understand more regarding the topic by focusing on the biological and philosophical aspects of the problem. It is perfectly normal for wealthy individuals to want a better life for their children at the same time as other, less privileged individuals, experience distress as a result of belonging to a different social group. In addition to being motivated by their intellect in doing this, these people are influenced by their genes, as they concentrated on reproducing themselves and have no interest in the well-being of other genes.

Conditions in the U.S. have come to be influenced by factors that are against the country's early cultural values. Whereas it was initially shaped by a wide range of cultures and by tolerance toward everyone, it has gradually come to develop a discriminatory attitude concerning non-white or underprivileged individuals.

Children are responsible for taking genes further and it is very important for people to ensure that their children are provided with all the resources necessary for them to evolve properly, so as for them to have more chances to continue to replicate their genes. It is apparently currently not abnormal for "wealthier communities to have better-funded schools at a lower tax rate than poor communities" (Fischel).

The Constitution itself can be considered to be the result of cultural values and moral thought being brought together in producing a safe environment for individuals in the U.S. Considering that schools in the U.S. gradually come to be good or bad depending on the funds invested in them and on the basis of people frequenting them, it is only normal for parents to want their children to attend educational institutes that they consider to be better. However, this also depends on the parents and their children, as it is very likely for a poor African-American parent to have encounter difficulties in getting his child to join a reputable school. People thus come to evolve on account of their background instead of being appreciated primarily for their abilities. The "No Child Left Behind" concept seems absent in an environment where discrimination governs.

Schools gradually become a place where children are selected on the basis of their abilities and their particularities. Those who fail to fulfill all the requirements needed for them to qualify as distinguished students are actually left behind and encouraged to drop out. Good students benefit the educational institute that they attend, their parents, and their community. They are in point of fact responsible for taking genes further because they come to be in the best circumstances possible for them to do so.

Selfish memes are most probably accountable for people wanting more from their children, from the educational institute that they work in, and from society as a whole. As a consequence, it should not be surprising that many individuals do everything in their power in order to exclude underprivileged individuals from society.

Not only do students in some schools struggle to get through school with as little trouble as possible, as they actually have to survive a demanding system that is almost dedicated to eradicating them. In contrast, students in more privileged schools are encouraged to evolve even when they seem to lack the abilities to do so. When they observe that they have access to a series of advantages, some groups are predisposed to do their best in order to prevent other communities from being presented with the same benefits as themselves, as this would obviously affect their genes and their memes.

According to Kozol, some educational institutes receive little financial support while others are provided with large amounts of money to guarantee the best conditions available for students that are being taught there. One can actually claim that Dawkins took on a more scholarly approach at discussing the topic of the selfish gene while Kozol was primarily interested in providing his readers with his own perspective concerning matters in the U.S. educational system.

It is very probable that Kozol is attempting to create a meme through his studies. He apparently wants to change people's perception in regard to the American school system with the purpose of change to actually take place. He focuses on some of history's most critical cases in an attempt to have people understand the gravity of the situation. The writer wants social reform to happen but gives little details concerning a solution to this problem, seemingly wanting his readers to unite in generating thought and action that would remedy matters. Kozol is against selfish genes and memes and intends to have the Government give out a law preventing underprivileged individuals from being discriminated.

In order for the general public to be supportive regarding Kozol's theory, people would have to change mostly everything that they learnt until the moment. In making educational institutes contain the same privileges all around the country, rich parents would practically involve their children in what most of them consider a mediocre environment. Even with that, in a system that is known for promoting freedom, it seems immoral for the government to prevent rich people from providing their children with preferential treatment. One finds himself in front of an ethical dilemma in trying to present students with equal opportunities, as in order to do so, the respective individual would have to deny people the right to invest in their children. The solution to this difficulty is much more complex that one might imagine. The fact that some schools lack sufficient funding is not the only problem that students in the respective educational institutes have to deal with, as they are also discriminated on account of a series of other particularities that one can identify in them.

Genes and memes would be unable to intervene in an environment where the authorities would provide individuals with adequate schooling opportunities. Such an educational system would make it possible for students to be equal and it would no longer seem that rich people thrive as a result of exploiting poor people and encouraging them to occupy the same social status for the rest of their lives.

It is not absolutely necessary for the government to implement laws that prevent rich parents from providing their children with the privileges that they want, as the authorities should actually create a system where individuals would be provided with the minimum amount of resources in order for them to be able to properly integrate society and so as for them to gain the ability to upgrade their social status.

Because of their genes and as a result of their cultural values, people are inclined to put across a supportive attitude toward individuals belonging to the same group as themselves. This makes it more difficult for the government to address the topic of educational inequality because of the social aspect of the matter. People would first need to overcome their social boundaries in order for them to be able to create an educational system where students would no longer be discriminated. It is very probable that matters today would be different if the government were to realize that one of the reasons for which prisons are filled is the fact that most of the prisoners there have not had access to proper educational opportunities and found it more difficult to integrate society.

Kozol wants people to acknowledge that it is essential for memes to be changed in order for the U.S. educational system to experience progress. Society needs to change its discriminatory attitude, the government needs to focus on rehabilitating educational institutes in order for underprivileged students to be able to evolve naturally, and the masses have to understand that it is abnormal for people to be publicly discriminated in an environment that presumably upholds moral values.

In spite of the fact that it is very important for all educational institutes to provide students with adequate schooling resources, the general public needs to recognize how people are unequal in their nature from the very moment that they are born. It would be absurd for someone to want all people to be the same or for the respective person to want individuals to evolve similarly. The selfish gene makes it clear that there will always be differences between people, given that it is in their genes for them to express interest in supporting their own kind at the same time as they disregard other groups.

Parents who are actually capable to provide their children with privileges do so and consider that it is up to them to reform the school system at a small level (by only making things better for their children).

Authorities are often inclined to believe that there is no use in investing funds in schools present in underprivileged areas because students there are more likely to drop out of school and because it would practically be a waste of money to do so. It would be very difficult and time-consuming for memes to change matters in the contemporary educational system in the U.S. It is thus very important for people to realize that they have to act fast and that it is their role to provide future generations with equal educational opportunities.

In an environment where the upper social classes decided what should and what should not be done, it is almost impossible for underprivileged individuals to upgrade their social status. White rich people in the U.S. are virtually in charge of the situation, making it very improbable for memes to change in accordance with moral values. Selfish genes and cultural values are decisive in setting trends in the American educational system. Protecting one's gene pool and one's cultural values is apparently more important in some conditions than it is to assist other individuals.

Both Kozol and Dawkins appear to reluctantly accept the fact that it is typical for humans to express selfish feelings, as this is something that they have become accustomed to and which they seen in others throughout their lives. Although there are also a series of situations when people actually act against their nature and help others that they have nothing in common with, there is a general tendency for individuals to express hesitation about assisting someone that they consider a stranger.

You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2011). Richard Dawkins\' the Selfish Gene Jonathan Kozol\'s. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/richard-dawkins-the-selfish-gene-jonathan-51093

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.