Essay Doctorate 1,421 words

Theoretical Approaches: There Are Several Theoretical Approaches

Last reviewed: April 29, 2013 ~8 min read
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare and contrast dispositional theories and humanistic and existential theories of personality. This evaluation begins with a brief description of each of these theories based on their underlying assumptions and descriptions of personality. This is followed by a discussion of the similarities and differences between the theories.

Theoretical Approaches:

There are several theoretical approaches that have been developed by different personality theorists that focus on explaining the uniqueness of individuals. These theories have particularly been developed in the field of personality psychology that includes some popular thinkers or theorists like Sigmund Freud. Since these theories provide different approaches to understanding personality, they have been classified into different categories based on their focus and the psychologists who developed them. Some of the most common categories of personality theories include biological, behavioral, psychodynamic, trait, and humanistic and existential theories. In addition, some of the most common theoretical approaches in the personality psychology field include dispositional, learning, psychodynamic, and humanistic and existential theories or approaches.

Dispositional Theories:

The development of dispositional theories can be attributed to the work of Gordon Allport who stressed on the distinctiveness of the individual unlike any other personality theorist. Allport focused on an individual's uniqueness because of his belief that describing people based on their general traits denies them of their unique individuality (Feist & Feist, 2009, p.375). During this period, Allport refuted the trait and factor theories that seemingly lessened individual behaviors to common traits. The emphasis on an individual's uniqueness was referred to as morphogenic science, which was considerably different from nomothetic techniques used by many psychologists of theorists.

Dispositional theories are based on several assumptions including the fact that every individual has steady and long-lasting dispositions to exhibit some emotions, behaviors, and attitudes. The individual dispositions usually appear in different situations, which is the reason for people's predictable action in different settings. In addition, every individual has varying set of dispositions that contribute to a unique pattern. Generally, there are two main kinds of dispositional theories i.e. type theories and trait theories. Type theories classify people to different categories of personality based on their temperament. In contrast, trait theories are based on the assumption that people have different traits that can be regarded as ongoing characteristics that these people possess in varying amounts. These theories have contributed to development of objective personality tests that have become central to personality assessment.

Humanistic and Existential Theories:

As important parts of psychology, humanistic and existential theories originated in the field of philosophy and moved into psychology. Humanistic and existential theories were developed based on the foundations established by Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers (Woodward, n.d.). However, these approaches have developed to become much wider and more complex that the foundational approach established by these theorists. The main focus of these theories is valuing the basic goodness in individuals and the human potential. While the humanistic approach emphasizes basic goodness and respect for individuals, the existential approach is based on understanding and accepting a person's own existence and responsibility.

Similar to other personality theories, the humanistic and existential theories are based on several assumptions and beliefs. Some of these assumptions include the fact that an individual possesses and inherent worth by merely being human, personal growth and understanding the main goal of life, and the present is the most significant element of the individual. Based on the works of Maslow and Rogers, humanistic and existential theories embrace a holistic approach to human existence and psychological health. This is through determination of self-actualization, values, personal experience and responsibility, spirituality, meaning, and human potential.

Similarities between the Theories:

The dispositional theories and humanistic/existential theories have some similarities despite of being designed by different theorists and focusing on different aspects of an individual's personality. One of the most significant similarities between the two theoretical approaches is that they share some basic assumptions with regards to their explanation of personality. An example of the basic assumptions underlying the two theories is a more philosophical and less scientific approach. For example, Allport's theory adopts a more philosophical rather than scientific approach just like the theory of Rollo May.

The second similarity between the two theories is that they have been developed through refuting certain approached provided by other theorists and theories. The humanistic and existential theories emerged as refutation of the deterministic and mechanistic thinking or approach provided by cognitive-behavioral and psychoanalytic theories. As a result, these theories believe that people are more than machines, which implies that they deserve dignity and respect for all aspects of their being (Woodward, n.d.). Similarly, dispositional theories were developed as objection to the trait and factor approaches that tend to lessen the behavior of individuals to common traits. Such classification in turn denies people of their unique individuality by describing them in general terms or perspectives. Therefore, it can be concluded that dispositional and humanistic/existential theories place much significance on an individual's self-actualization and uniqueness.

Differences between the Theories:

While these theoretical approaches have certain similarities between them, they also have numerous differences with regards to their explanations human personality. Some of the major areas in which these theories differ include the role of personality in influencing situational behavior, personality characteristics, and interpersonal relational aspects. The differences in each of these segments are the reasons for the different approaches and assumptions adopted by the theories and theorists.

According to Allport, personality can be described as the dynamic organization within the individual of the psychophysical systems that influence his distinctive changes to his environment (Feist & Feist, 2009, p.378). However, the last phrase of this definition was changed to psychophysical systems that determine an individual's characteristic thought and behavior. Based on this definition, personality is psychological and physical since it incorporates secret thoughts and obvious behaviors. Regardless of the attempts by various psychologists and theorists to define personality, it seems that there is no actual definition of this term since various ideas about the development of personality have evolved over time. It appears that personality is largely dependent on the individual's view on his/her own reality, which influences how he/she will respond in various ever-changing situations.

Dispositional theories and humanistic/existential theories have little differences with regards to the role of personality in affecting situational behavior or responding to several situations. Dispositional theories consider proactive behaviors more preferable than reactive behaviors through highlighting the significance of behaving based on individual perception of the circumstance. The theories state that psychologically mature individuals are characterized by proactive behavior i.e. they consciously act to situations in new and innovative ways. In contrast, humanistic/existential approaches argue that good psychological health is basis for individual's reaction to various situations.

The other difference is related to the personality characteristics associated with each of these theories. Humanistic and existential theories focus on the motivation that influences or determines behaviors. These theories also highlight the use of conscious choice and free will in the decision making process. Some of the personality characteristics associated with the humanistic and existential theoretical approaches includes independence, opportunistic, self-actualization, and creativity. As part of the self-actualization tendency, these personality characteristics are crucial to the intrinsic drive toward growth and healing (Woodward, n.d.). In contrast, dispositional theories focus on motivation driven by the effect of genetics rather than conscious choice and free will. As a result, some of the personality characteristics attributed to dispositional theories includes extraversion, introversion, neuroticism, and openness to experience. These personality characteristics in dispositional theories are the main components that create an organizational model that is commonly described as the Five-Factor Model.

You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
4 sources cited in this paper
  • Feist, J. & Feist, G. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed., pp.373-437). New York, NY:
  • McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Woodward, W.M. (n.d.). Humanistic-Existential Theory: A Group Theory Paper. Retrieved
  • April 29, 2013, from http://www.thedivinesoul.net/pdfdocuments/humanisticexistentialtheory.pdf
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Theoretical Approaches: There Are Several Theoretical Approaches. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/theoretical-approaches-there-are-several-87647

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.