Shirley King Traditionally Spanking Was Term Paper

PAGES
1
WORDS
384
Cite

Shirley King

Traditionally spanking was part of standard parenting methods. A seemingly innocent, harmless type of discipline, spanking would provide the child with a physical memory and response. Parents probably thought they were doing their child a favor by spanking them, which is why many parents still say, "This hurts me more than it hurts you." Shirley King disagrees with the traditional use of corporal punishment on children. Stating that spanking has several undesirable effects on the child's psyche and on the parent-child relationships, the author urges her readers to avoid using spanking as a legitimate means of punishment. Her reasoning makes perfect sense. Although I was never predisposed to spanking my children, I might have used corporal punishment as an easy way out, a means to avoid verbal confrontations.

Directly dealing with the child's outbursts or misbehaviors creates a stronger sense of internalized discipline than spanking ever could. As King notes, spanking reduces the child's self-esteem. Spanking renders the child powerless. The spanking suggests that the child has no control over his or her body. Moreover, the spanking is a brutish, unnecessary display of force by the parent. Parents are authority figures but they should assert their authority judiciously to instill positive, non-violent values into their children. When a parent spanks a child he or she sends a negative message and essentially silences the child.

If the child is not treated with respect, he or she is also more likely to act out years later. As King points out, spanking diminishes the bond of trust between parents and their children. A child who is spanked grows up with a certain degree of fear. The parent who spanks the child will always seem like a formidable figure to the child, and as someone who can never be pleased or reasoned with. Even when the parent stops using spanking as a form of punishment the child will remember the pain. Ironically, the child will probably not remember the specific incident that triggered the spanking, which proves that spanking doesn't even work.

I will take what King says directly to heart. Talking with children when they misbehave and offering constructive alternatives to corporal punishment may seem like daunting tasks. However, raising a child in a nurturing, positive, supportive environment should be the duty of all parents.

Cite this Document:

"Shirley King Traditionally Spanking Was" (2006, November 28) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/shirley-king-traditionally-spanking-was-41431

"Shirley King Traditionally Spanking Was" 28 November 2006. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/shirley-king-traditionally-spanking-was-41431>

"Shirley King Traditionally Spanking Was", 28 November 2006, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/shirley-king-traditionally-spanking-was-41431

Related Documents
Spanking Children
PAGES 5 WORDS 1563

Spanking Children Spanking has been a form of corporal punishment for centuries. Before psychological research on the topic expanded and was made public, it was just an accepted way of teaching children how to behave. However, recently the negative side of spanking has been revealed. Analysis conducted on adults who have experienced spanking as children have proven that the negative aspects of these acts of physical harm are quite real. Though

Spanking Children Should Not Be Spanked in Order to Discipline Them for Negative Behavior Spanking has been used by parents for generations, and various forms of corporal punishment have been deployed for disciplinary measures for centuries. However, the enduring popularity of spanking as a method for disciplining children does not mean that it accomplishes the task it endeavors to achieve. Indeed, spanking has many negative potential consequences that make it an unfavorable

Spanking Perhaps no topic generates as much heated debate among parents and child development experts as corporal punishment. While defenders argue for the continued necessity of the practice, new research shows more clearly the benefits of sparing the rod and avoiding corporal punishment altogether. These studies cite numerous reasons against corporal punishment, from increasing aggression in children to the practice's moral repugnance. This paper, however, focuses on studies that show corporal punishment

Spanking DISCIPLINE vs. AGGRESSION Imagine a child doing anything he wants as he grows up and parents only mildly warning him against the ill consequences of certain acts or situations. We all know that a child is launched into this world, not knowing what acts are safe or unsafe and naturally needing not just guidance and protection but also his parents' intervention. Every child wants to explore and is instinctively stubborn and

spanking is an approved method of discipline in the schoolroom. Spanking is a controversial form of punishment, and many people do not believe in spanking as a discipline measure. However, spanking does have a place in the discipline of a child if it is used correctly. Spanking Families have used spanking as a method of disciplining children for centuries, and it has been used in school systems as a punishment, as

Behavioral and Long-Term Effects of Spanking Behavioral and Long-Term Effect of Spanking Many of the studies pointed out that violence of adult are traced in the pattern of violence at home, and mostly in the experience of spanking during childhood. Despite the information and advocacy available in almost all media these days, there are still parents who thought that spanking their children to emphasize discipline is still beneficial. The benefits cited by