Grading rubric guidelines and assessment criteria

Social Ecology Model

Social ecology requires that people see that nature and society are intertwined by progress into one environment that is made up of two differences. The first difference being biotic nature and the second being human nature. Human nature and biotic nature split an evolutionary prospective for better prejudice and elasticity. Nature is the manner in which people are flexible, extremely intellectual primates that occupy the natural world. In other words, individuals generate an atmosphere that is most appropriate for their manner of survival. In this case, human nature is no different from the atmosphere that each animal, contingent upon its aptitudes, generates as well as acclimates to, the biophysical conditions or eco community in which it lives. On this extremely basic level, people are, in fact, doing nothing that varies from the endurance actions of nonhumans (Bookchin, 2001).

The SEM is made up of several levels wrapped around one another. At the heart of the model is the individual person. At this point, it is important to look at the inner causes of behavior, such as information, approaches, views, and abilities. This is the initial level, but the model distinguishes that numerous outside influences that affect these individual causes. In order to enable performance alteration it is significant to deal with these outside forces (Social Ecological Model, n.d.).

The next level of SEM looks at the foremost of these outside influences, interpersonal processes. Everyone can understand how the impact of individuals close to them affects their actions. At this level, one should contemplate principal sets of social interaction such as family and acquaintances. This is the point where social standards function, while they are created at the institutional and community levels. These principal connections signify the relations that offer social distinctiveness and role meaning. In a lot of interpersonal associations there are certain people in social roles, which are seen as important decision makers. Recognizing these decision producers, or persons of encouragement, is significant to simplifying individual performance alteration (Social Ecological Model, n.d.).

Institutions and organizations are made up of gatherings of chief interpersonal associations. There frequently are little groups or circles that develop, though, all function under a shared set of guidelines and rules that lead behavior. The institutional/organization level of SEM reflects these regulations and rules. Involvement at this level can have incredible persuasion over people. Workplace involvement, religious programs, and school are instances of programming at this level. Although this level positively comprises policy, this is dissimilar from the social construction, public policy level of the model (Social Ecological Model, n.d.).

The next level of SEM to look at is that of the community. This level comprises all people, industries, organizations and societies, which together make up the bigger societal structure. These bigger social concepts can be seen in numerous ways, like by geographical location, association in a specific group, or ownership of definite beliefs that create associations. For example, there can be a neighborhood identified by a locality. It is at this level that numerous social standards and principles are produced. This is also a significant point for setting the public program and increasing affiliations. Although people facilitate work at this level, involvement aimed at specific individual traits, or factors persuading behavior as explained at the individual level, are not the same as at the community level (Social Ecological Model, n.d.). 74003019

Lastly, the outer level of SEM is the social structure / public policy level. Public policy is the influential decisions that are made by a neighborhood, state, or federal prevailing entity. Environmental alteration would be encompassed in this level, as it is frequently attained by way of policy choices. Environmental alteration frequently contains a concrete alteration in a neighborhood or association, while, social structural alterations comprise more normative or theoretical changes. This is the widest level of the model and can affect all the additional levels (Social Ecological Model, n.d.).

Looking at health issues from a Social Ecological Model takes into account both the sources of sickness and suggests new means by which to encourage holistic well-being, avert sickness, and care for patients. The importance is caring for people, family units, and neighborhoods previous to their decline into sickness known as upstream thinking. This model looks at age, sex, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic variances that influence how people get along and develop, and consequently directly and indirectly effect heath dangers and assets (Innovative Pediatric Nursing Role: Public Health Nurses in Child Welfare: Theoretical Framework for Health Case Management Role, 2006).