Social Studies: Is it History?

¶ … Social Studies: Is it History?" By Lisa Zamosky Children in many classrooms are lacking in basic social studies knowledge (geography, history, and a basic understanding of the political system.

The "No Child Left Behind" Law has left less instructional time for social studies and other educational areas that are not deemed as essential for the standardized testing NCLB demands Eliminating Social Studies means less prepared citizens Lack of knowledge creates concerns for full participation in the country's democratic system Educators believe that social studies "are integral in teaching a sense of civic duty" and fulfill society's expectations of public school learning Emphasis on other areas is the prime culprit Reduced time spent teaching social studies and other subjects was noticeable even before NCLB B.

A 2007 report found that at least 44% had cut time from certain subjects to improve test scores in other areas Problems worse for low-income kids A. Low-income and high-minority schools are far less likely to spend adequate or any time learning social studies B. Could lead to a societal division between "those who know what a difference they can make as citizens and those who don't." V. Lack of Social Studies means lack of social understanding A.

Social studies provides an understanding of the social network, which no other subject adequately covers. B. Lack of social studies could mean a lack of understanding how to work in a large group over extended periods of time to accomplish things VI. Less Social Studies puts students at risk of general academic failure A. No understanding of vocabulary needed for history and other courses taken later in the course of education. B.

General reading ability and comprehension also suffers, especially on standardized tests that assume general knowledge about certain subjects VII. "Learning in a vacuum" reduces intellectual ability A. Learning about interconnected disciplines in isolation from.