Sociophysical Issues in Environmental Design

¶ … Sociophysical Issues in Environmental Design - a Normative Stance In this chapter, the author discusses problems that affect both designers and environmental psychologists. Specifically discussed are designer's responsibilities, social concerns, design goals, design scope, and the conclusion. Designer's responsibilities: The author asks whether environmental designers should involve themselves in establishing the behavioral program.

If so, to what degree? How much control should the designer have in establishing the behavioral program, if any? The author states that all designers should involve themselves to the extent that they can address the pros and cons of the effects of design on the behavioral program, and that they understand their limitations regarding knowledge of the behavioral program as a whole. Social Concerns: Every act in design is of a political nature. However, the designed environment is a limited force when it comes to shaping society.

With regard to homogeneity and heterogeneity of populations, land, and building uses designers should advocate for the best environment for any given type of society and are responsible for suggesting design improvements to enhance that society. In society, Individual roles and activity patterns are constantly changing. For this reason, it is important to look at behavioral systems and design patterns and work in concert with other professionals in the behavioral sciences when determining the best designs for any given society.

Which is better, an egalitarian or a socially hierarchical society and should the designed environment be a reflection of one or the other (should homes reflect one's social standing)? Per the author, architecture and environmental design should address one's individuality as well as the society in which one lives. When looking at environmental design on an institutional scale, the author addresses which is better for society, large or small scale? Small scale allows for more participation and is therefore preferable, but large is better than none at all.

With regard to accessibility to all with dignity, the author believes that all people should be able to participate in mainstream activities and should be afforded easy access to do so. Design Goals: Whose requirements are more important in design, the user or the sponsor? The answer is both are important, but if there is a conflict, the designer has an obligation to at least advocate on the behalf of the user.

Should the design end be focused on the centrality of activity systems or aesthetics (looks or utility)? Both are important, but society's needs must be met first. Should design focus on comfort with regard to the current social pattern or design with change in mind? Design should focus on both by creating environments which are modestly demanding on the users. With regard to life-safety qualities vs. livability issues, life-safety comes first (fire exits). However, the designer has an obligation to make an environment as livable as possible.

As to the desire for space vs. The need for access, designers should advocate for the needs of the.