Specter Of Communism," Leffler's Core Focal Point Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
974
Cite

¶ … Specter of Communism," Leffler's core focal point is lying on the U.S. reply to the increase and spread of communism inside the Soviet Union, as well as its succeeding efforts to broaden the structure globally. Consequently, the effort is undermanned in its clarification of the causes following the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, the civil war that ensured, and simply adopts a concise aspect at the blow made by the U.S., as well as British rejection to obligate to Soviet policy for the period of World War II.

Yet simultaneously, Leffler's approach into U.S. efforts to separate and destabilize the communist gathering all through the 1920s and 30s, along with his examination of the point of potency as of which the U.S. was capable to carry out foreign relations in the late 1940s, go further than that of the characteristic cold war period efforts.

I believe that the most appealing mark of Melvyn P. Leffler's "The Specter of Communism" is its capability to examine the genesis of the Cold War devoid of inserting guilt on either of the two superpowers or their political values and principles.

After reading this book, I believe Leffler's thesis is that the Soviets, as well as the Americans had committed mistakes, regularly, for the circumstances that sourced the past WWII partners to turn out to be foes.

I believe that the utmost characteristic of this book is not constantly what it replies, however to a certain extent, the queries that it draws out from the reader. This chronological...

...

In other words, Leffler imparts the reader with specifics that he/she possibly would previously have recognized, but he operates the additional mile when he presents instances to take a more intimate look at the account that is being presented.
The Review

The most excellent meaning of Leffler's hypothesis is when he puts in writing, "The Cold War dominated international relations for almost a half-century after the end of World War II. (Leffler VII)

Leffler's notion adopts on an added domestic attitude whilst he puts in writing, "American officials had concluded as early as 1940 that they could not live in a world dominated by totalitarian nations, even if these powers refrained from attacking the United States." (Leffler VII)

It gives the impression as though these two accounts best review the facts that Leffler employs to aim and illustrate the commencement of communism, as well as the communist fright in the United States all through 1917-1953.

His label "The Specter of Communism" inclines to position to a principle that eventually Leffler considered as though a phantom of communism was nearby all through the stretch of time he observes. "It was the specter of communism at home rather than the power of Russian Bolshevism abroad that fueled anti-communist rhetoric." (Leffler 25)

To a certain extent, Leffler does good effort at demarking how he turned up at his notion that a phantom of communism was emitted over the world all…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Sarah Bey. A Review: "The Specter of Communism." Steinmetz Academic Centre', Chicago, Illinois.


Cite this Document:

"Specter Of Communism Leffler's Core Focal Point" (2003, March 26) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/specter-of-communism-leffler-core-focal-145565

"Specter Of Communism Leffler's Core Focal Point" 26 March 2003. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/specter-of-communism-leffler-core-focal-145565>

"Specter Of Communism Leffler's Core Focal Point", 26 March 2003, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/specter-of-communism-leffler-core-focal-145565

Related Documents

Communism & Nationalism Communism Communism is a society without money (For Communism) 1, without a state, without property and without social classes. People come together to carry out a project or to respond to some need of the human community but without the possibility of their collective activity taking the form of an enterprise that involves wages and the exchange of its products. The circulation of goods is not accomplished by means

In more historical terms communism has attempted to overthrow and change the dominance of capitalism in the world through social and people's revolution. A case in point was the Maoist Cultural Revolution in China. It is also clear that the two central modes of political and economic organization are, in terms of their fundamental vision, very different and in opposition to one another. While on the one hand capitalism stresses

Communism in Cuba Communism refers to a revolutionary socialist movement that creates classes, stateless social orders and moneyless on ownership of the means of production. It also involves social, economic and political ideologies that focus on the establishment of social order. Therefore there is replacement of private goods of capital among individuals with the common ownership and the distribution of these when need arises. It is a theoretical system of the

Conclusion The historical events leading to the communist invasion of both territories, Poland and Yugoslavia were external influences and occurred as the aftermath of the Second World War when the Nazis were attempting to create a communist power block. The takeover was somewhat willing in Poland based on the manipulative skills of the Soviet Government while in Yugoslavia the Red Army had to force their way into the territory, in both

Communism Soviet Union The simplest explanation for the collapse of the Soviet Union is that the system was not sufficiently stable to withhold both its own needs and the demands of an arms race. The very ideal of communism is that a nation will be freed from the demands of over-production and over-consumption which are the predicted bane of capitalism. Ideally, freed from the requirements of making a profit for the capitalist

" (I.1.3) Smith focuses not on the laborer, but on the maker of pins. In fact, the maker of pins, seamlessly becomes the owner of a pin-making factory, even though this would not necessarily be the case under industrialism -- in fact, what had become a specialized trade was now performed in a series of parts by many workers. But in Smith's view, the consumer profits by the lower price