This essay examines Anne Bradstreet's 'To My Dear and Loving Husband' as an exemplar of Puritan poetry that seamlessly integrates spiritual devotion with romantic love. The analysis explores how Bradstreet employs biblical imagery and religious concepts to elevate marital affection to a sacred level. Through close reading, the paper demonstrates how Puritan poets reconciled earthly passion with spiritual faith, creating a unique form of devotional poetry.
Anne Bradstreet\\\\\\\'s poem “To My Dear and Loving Husband” is a simple yet very deep and very beautiful expression of love from a woman to a man, a wife to a husband, a lover to a lover. It exudes devotion that is rooted in a biblical idea of matrimony—which is made apparent in the very first line: “If ever two were one, then surely we” (Bradstreet 1). The idea of two in one flesh is found in Scripture (Mark 10:8). This would have been well known to Bradstreet and her husband, since they were religious people of the Puritan faith. In a sense, Bradstreet is saying that she and her husband are the epitome of what the Bible is talking about when it talks about two becoming one in holy matrimony. They are the epitome of this bond because their bond is rooted in love. In this way, Bradstreet, who was the first published American poet, is able to eloquently and romantically weave her religious faith in with her genuine love for her husband. This is how she creates a piece that is at once intimately personal and yet at the same time extremely universal. It is universal because every pair of lovers has felt the exact same way as she: like they were the epitome of the kind of love talked about in Mark—two become one. The fact is, that is just how lovers are supposed to be, when their love is pure and holy. The poem thus reflects the depth of this concept and the depth of her real affection; it explores the nature of love but also the nature of mortality and the spell that the idea of eternity holds for those who love.
The speaker\\\\\\\'s feelings towards her husband are characterized by unwavering love, which is part of the ideal marital union. The poem\\\\\\\'s opening line immediately sets the tone for this unity, suggesting a perfect harmony that goes beyond physical union to a spiritual or soulful connection. However, there is also a tone of rivalry: “Compare with me, ye women, if you can…” (Bradstreet 4). There is a competitive zest in that feisty line—almost like a dare, as though Bradstreet knows that few marry well or that few marry as well as she has. She is perhaps not boasting—but she exudes confidence and uses hyperbole to show it: “I prize thy love more than whole mines of gold”—meaning she values her husband more than all the riches in the world.
There is a clear indication by Bradstreet that this love is temporary, however, because the nature of life on earth is that it must conclude with death. Yet, because of her faith, she believes that those who love will be rewarded with eternal life on the other side of the grave. Thus, she says she prays for her husband that he may be rewarded with such eternal life. She ends the poem saying that if they love well here on earth, they may live forever in heaven.
It is a grand sentiment. Ultimately, her love is not rooted in the object (her husband) but in the faith that motivates and animates her. It is rooted in the love that she believes God has for all people. This is the main thrust of her poem. It is a love poem to her husband, but ultimately it is also a love poem to God because it demonstrates a strong faith in God’s promise to reward those with eternal life who show charity to others. Her love for her husband is based in this charity. She prays for him out of charity. She seeks to edify her neighbors with her example. She wants to be happy in this kind of loving, charitable, holiness.
It is an interesting concept—a selfless love that burns with passion and joy and yet is totally focused on the other, on loving rather than only on being loved. She acknowledges, though, that she is loved—which means that this two-way flow is important. It would be a different poem tonally if it were not a two-way flow of love, she to her husband and he to her. But it is actually a three-way flow of love. There is the flow in the matrimonial love, and also the flow of love from God to them and them to God.
The use of possessive pronouns such as \\\\\\\"my\\\\\\\" and \\\\\\\"thy\\\\\\\" throughout the poem reinforces the closeness and intimacy between the speaker and her husband. This choice of words not only personalizes their love but also signifies ownership and a mutual belonging that is profound and exclusive. The phrase \\\\\\\"my dear and loving husband\\\\\\\" itself is a tender address that shows her affection. And when she expresses a desire for their love to be rewarded in the afterlife—\\\\\\\"That when we live no more, we may live ever\\\\\\\"—it reflects a belief in the eternal life and the hope that their love will transcend mortal limits, earning them a place in heaven together. This intertwining of spiritual aspirations with marital love elevates their relationship. The poem\\\\\\\'s concluding couplet, \\\\\\\"Then while we live, in love let\\\\\\\'s so persevere / That when we live no more, we may live ever,\\\\\\\" is a powerful testimony to this faith. This belief basically suggests that love is a spiritual act.
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.