Identifying and analyzing internal and external stakeholders in coalition planning

Stakeholder Profile

Internal and External stakeholders in a coalition plan.

Stakeholders refer to the communities, people, or organizations that directly feel the impact of the decisions and actions of an organization. In addition, a stakeholder refers to anyone with an interest in a business. Internal stakeholders are people or groups that work directly with an organization, thereby making them qualify to be part of the organization. They include the employees, management, suppliers, customers and so forth (Bailey, 2005). On the other hand, external stakeholders refer to organizations or a person who are not directly working with the business but in a way feel the impact from the business's decisions. In addition, although the external stakeholders do not work directly with the business they have an interest in the business. They include the local governments, local communities, investment groups, the media, and many others. Though the government does not take part in a business firm, the imposition of tax and collection of revenue makes it eligible to be a stakeholder (Bailey, 2005).

Stakeholder worksheet

A stakeholder worksheet involves an analysis to evaluate, identify, and determine the influence and importance of key people, groups of people, or organizations that may have a significant impact the success of a business project, activity, or policy. Creating a stakeholder worksheet will involve identifying and mapping of the internal and external stakeholders, evaluating the importance and influence of the stakeholders. Stakeholder mapping is the primary process during the creation of a stakeholder engagement. It refers to identifying the target groups and pulling as much information on them as possible. In developing such a public problem, of changing the gun laws, there is the need to appreciate the powers of various stakeholders, and their subsequent participation.

Internal stakeholders

Interest

Nature of power

Employees

They ensure a stable employment in an organization

Employees have unions who support them in case they have grievances.

Stockholders

They receive dividends from firms

They have shares and use it during voting

Customers

They receive a just business, in buying of services and goods.

They can boycott goods or services if they feel they are of low quality.

Suppliers

They receive orders for services and goods.

They act as suppliers, and may not supply goods if there is breach of contract.

Retailers

They offer products to consumers, and receive goods at a reasonable cost.

They buy goods from other suppliers.

They can boycott goods from companies whose policies are unsatisfying.

Creditors

They collect debts, interest, and are responsible for loan repayments.

They call in loans in a case where there are delay payments. In addition, they may seek legal advice to reposes property.

External stakeholders

Interest

Nature of power

Communities

The communities seek for employment, development of environment and protection of their environment.

The community may lobby for regulation of a company's policy, restrict the operating validity, and reject extension of credit.

Stakeholders influence diagram

The influence that stakeholders may have on organizational policy, strategy, and projects depends on the relationship to either the organization itself or the problem at hand. The influence and importance of stakeholders always depends on the objective aimed. Stakeholders are central to the growth or support to implementation of policies, or business activities. The problems, interests, and needs of stakeholders need priority. If the organization ignores effective evaluation of important stakeholders, then there is a likelihood of failing of a strategy.

The internal stakeholders influence an organization directly by having a legal hierarchy, having control of strategic resources and authority of leadership, and having the strength in relation to other stakeholders. External stakeholders may influence an organization through internal links, possessing knowledge and skill, taking part in strategy implementation, and control of strategic resources. Key stakeholders have high influence and highly important and so the need to engage them in the project

Gun Law: Historical overview, Problem, Approach to address this problem

The right to keep and bear arms went unchallenged for decades, until 1837 when the gun control laws created in Georgia. However, the Supreme Court abolished the law eight years later. After the civil war, several southern states aimed to prevent the blacks from owning guns, but this ended in 1868 because every citizen had equal rights. The first federal gun control happened in the 1920 and 30's. Over the last 80 years, the U.S. Congress has written controversial gun control laws due to the shocking crimes involving guns (Blair, 1999).

Automatic weapons came to use during a time when organized crime came to effect. The National Firearms Act of 1934-1938 seemed to encourage a new element of the crime. In a bid, to regulate machine guns, the government imposed tax on their manufacture and sale. All sales made record, and all the dealers had a license for the same. Again, there was a prohibition on violent criminals not to own guns. The court rulings changed part of the laws, but the main points were inclusive on the regulations. The shootings of President John F. Kennedy in the 1960s paved way for the passage of the gun control act of 1968 under President Lyndon Johnson. The act prohibited convicted criminals, drug users, and the mentally ill from owning guns.

The shooting of President Ronald Reagan and the Whitehouse House press secretary James Brady led to a campaign to change the gun laws. The campaign took years, but it became law in 1993, the law created a waiting period during the purchase of a firearm, and required buyers to undergo background checks. By the year 2012, an estimated 156 million Americans had undergone background checks where an estimated 1 million did not go through the checks. The most essential Federal regulation was the Violent Crime Control and the Law enforcement Act of 1994 whereby it banned the assault with weapons. Currently, the U.S. is exploring new federal laws on gun regulation because of the witnessed shootings.

In 1988, handguns killed seven people in Britain, 19 in Sweden, and 8, 915 in the United States. A great difference noted in the killing around the globe. Gun control is a problem faced in the United States, which needs appropriate measures. In the past, there were no definite measures to control the gun laws. Recently, the shootings in the school, subway, and the gang related shootings have pushed to the forefront of political and social issues. The government should have ultimate powers on the control of handguns, and possession of firearms made illegal to avoid massacres. If the U.S. had stringent Laws on firearms, the school massacres would not be happening. It is time for the U.S. To accept that the gun laws need immediate reform because of the recurring school mass killing and the ludicrous gun legislation (Blair, 1999).

There are many ways on how to approach a problem and subsequently solving it. The first thing is to realize a problem exists. This will enable the involved parties to do something about the problem in order to solve the problem itself. The circumstances around the problem needs attention, otherwise they may grow to bigger problems that may prove hard to handle. Then, there need be suggestions on how to solve the problem. This will create a start in the problem solving process.

There need to be will to change the existing problem. The plan in place needs regular updating to curb the problem. If something ought to be changed in order for the problem to be solved, then a go ahead is needed and constant working towards the problem. The plan needs backup that is, people who are to solve this problem need to believe in themselves, the strategy, and the employed plans to solve the problem. In addition, the effort applied in trying to solve the problem.

Policy implementation

A public policy results from congressional legislation, presidential executive powers, and government agency regulations. Creation of public policy is not synonymous in its implementation. However, its creation means the beginning. Public policy implementation determines whether the goals of the public policy created realized. Creating an action plan begins with the consideration of the roles and responsibilities associated with the plan. Before creating a plan, the team should first check for an existing plan. In case there is an existing plan, then modification of it is necessary.

As the plan reaches its implementation stage, it is important to communicate the goals, objectives, timeframes, expectations, and roles, and responsibilities of the organization. The plan needs to be updated regularly and a frequent revision too. This will help stakeholders to stay connected with the progress of the action plan, or implementation of the policy. In addition, it ensures the stakeholders are aware of what is happening whether there is progress, the activity is towards completion, or it is no longer viable. Documenting the status will help in reviewing and keen monitoring of the plan (Crosby & Bryson, 2005).

In the policy implementation grid, policy makers must ensure that the policy implementation takes place in a way that achieves the goals developed earlier to solve the problem at hand. Policy implementation must be planned, facilitated, monitored, and evaluated. An implementation grid should have substantial for effective communication including incorporating observers who will help to spread information about the changes taking place. The model must be easy to comprehend that show how the desired changes work for effective implementation. In addition, implementation must be easy by emphasizing, and disseminating educational materials and operation guides (Crosby & Bryson, 2005).