State vs. Private Prison
The United States prison system is designed to ensure that the members of society who have chosen to violate the law and commit crimes are suitably punished. Prisoners are sent away for a period of time based on the crime committed and the severity of that crime. Additional factors such as age, mental and emotional state, and motive may have a contribution to the sentencing of the prisoner. The prison system is comprised of both state-funded institutions and those run and controlled by private funding. Both forms of institutions serve the same inherent function, to punish those who have committed crimes and to rehabilitate the offenders so that they can be released back into society without posing a potential threat to other law-abiding citizens. Those who cannot be rehabilitated will either be executed by the state or sent to prison for a life sentence. However, there are differences between private and public penitentiaries, both in the implementation of punishment and in the reformation of criminals which differentiate the two types of prisons.
Privatization has become an important role in many aspects of prison life, both while the convicted individual is within prison and afterwards when they are on probation (Siegel 546). In the current economy, many states have had to shut down publicly-owned facilities because the upkeep cannot be afforded. Many times this results in the early probation of criminals before they have served their full sentences, as well as a decrease in the level of care and observation during the probationary period of the former convict. In such instances, private corporations and entities take over existing penitentiary structures or construct new ones to alleviate the overcrowded prison system and ensure the situation does not become worse because of the shutdown (Zito).
Most privatized prisons in the United States operate mostly to deal with crimes involving drugs and alcohol. Rather than put a criminal in a traditional prison, the individual can be placed in a rehabilitation center where they have most of the same restrictions as a regular penitentiary. This is also true of institutions for the criminally insane, individuals who are guilty of crime but have been found to possess diminished mental capacity. Rather than go to prison, these individuals are placed in a secure medical facility where they can be more closely monitored by staff. The thesis is that these individuals are not responsible for criminal activity for any reason other than a dependency of drugs or because of their mental states. Given a more restrictive environment where they will not have access to drugs or alcohol, or where their mental state will be treated by proper officials.
There are many concerns about the potential dangers of a privatized prison system and the privatization of police forces as well. Of these, the two most prolific, according to Larry J. Siegel in Introduction to Criminal Justice, "first, there some concern that privatization puts the profit motive ahead of more lofty concerns like protection of private safety. Another concern is that private police could eventually replace government, or public, police" (218). For example, there have been recorded instances of private prisons cutting costs at the sake of prisoner safety and comfort (Zito). However, most states that contract out to private institutions monitor these places of prison occupation as closely as the state-run public facilities. There are also several positives with regard to privatized prison systems. Recidivism, or the potential for offenders to commit additional crimes after release, is 27% less likely with criminals who were institutionalized in private prisons (Zito).
Perhaps the most cause for concern is the problem of the potential for lack of security in privatized prisons and the potential for prison escapees. In August of 2010, three convicted murderers were able to break free from a privately operated medium-security jail in Arizona (Levine). All the convicts had to do was cut through a fence using a set of wire cutters. As the economy worsens in the United States, more counties have to rely on privatization of prisons to stop from having to release prisoners early.
You’re 78% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.