Statistical analysis of A-CAT voltage regulator sales forecasting
✍️ How to write this paper — writing tools ▾
Statistical Analysis Report for the A-CAT
A-CAT was one of the Indian leading producers of electrical appliance within the medium-scale industry. The A-CAT manufactured and distributed domestic appliance to the rural population India. Moreover, A-CAT had two medium-sized manufacturing units in a small town of Gondia located at the remote district in Vidarbha, a less develop area in India. The company primary flagship product was 500 kilovolt amps voltage regulator branded with VR-500 tag. Established in 1986, the company could boast of 40 employees. A-CAT had established a partnership alliance with Jupiter Inc. and Global Electricals for the production of cabinets and TV signal boosters respectively. Since 1986, the A-CAT had been in operation and the company budget between 2010 and 2011 provided the annual sales of Rs. 9,800,000 ($147,128). The functional company department are design department, manufacturing department, purchasing department, and sales and service department. Contrary to other companies that focus on the urban areas for the marketing operations, the A-CAT focuses on rural areas, and offers 100 different household electrical appliances that include FM radio kits, TV signal boosters, battery chargers, electronic ballasts, and voltage regulators.
However, the company has recorded a decline in the sale voltage regulators in the last few months. In reaction to a decline in sales, A-CAT deliberated to increase the inventory, however, some functional departments questioned the move of keeping the large number of transformers in stock. However, the management believed that an increase in stock of voltage regulators is necessary because these orders were categorized as rush orders. The other challenges that the A-CAT faced was that the suppliers were likely to increase the price if a continuity and uniformity for the transformers' order was not guaranteed. The company operations are also being affected by both the internal and external stakeholders. The important internal stakeholders are operation manager (Shirish Ratnaparkhi), Vice-president, store manager (Arun Mittra) and the company employees. The important external stakeholders are the suppliers, customers and the government.
On top of this, considering the economic outlook, and market scenario, the sales of voltage regulators have been volatile in the last few years despite an increase in the company revenue. Moreover, company faces the market problems, and the sales have been sluggish compared to the sales of the competitors. In response to the sluggish demand, the sale department has decided to forecast the demand for the voltage regulators in order to determine the amount of transformers to store in the inventory. Meanwhile the Vice President of the company called for the comprehensive data of the sales figures of the last several years. The usual method is to look into the sales figure within the last two years to estimate the number of transformers that would be needed for the voltage regulators. The essence of the data report is to meet the production levels, maintain the optimal stocking levels, and final productive levels. The data forecast will assist the company to plan the purchasing of the transformer better as well enhancing proposed sale projections.
II. Analysis Plan and Decision Making
A. Identification of the Quantifiable Factors Affecting performance of Operational Processes
The paper carries out the SWOT analysis to identify the quantifiable factors affecting performance of operational processes, which assists in enhancing the decision making of the A-CAT. Management.
Strength: The company financial records is one of the strengths of the A-CAT. The 2010 and 2011 budget reveals the annual sales of Rs 9,800,000. Since 2006, the A-CAT had enjoyed an increase in sales. For example, the company sold the average of 801.2 transformers voltage regulators in 2006, however, the company sales figure for the voltage regulators increased to 1,101.2 in 2010. The average sales figure that the company recorded during the past years contributed to the company strength. Moreover, the A-CAT recorded an increase in the sales of the refrigerators between 2006 and 2010. The company recorded sales of 16,102 refrigerators in 2006, and sales increased to 27,458 at the end of the 2010 fiscal year. The company strength also lies in its competent employees. The operation manager was one of the company competent employees who is responsible to forecast the effective production of goods using past data. Through the skill of the operation manager, the company is able to produce the goods tailored to the demand data.
Weakness: The A-CAT has not yet taken the advantages of the past data to forecast the appropriate number of product to manufacture and keep in the stock. For example, the company was unable to decide whether to keep the large stocks or small stocks in the inventory. Moreover, the company does not have enough resources to make suppliers to maintain same price for the product supplied. For example, the suppliers are likely to increase the price if the company has not been able to maintain the sales uniformity for the transformers.
Opportunities: The A-CAT can take opportunities of the healthy Indian economy and large population to achieve the market advantages. Dhoot, (2015) points the Indian economy has witnessed a substantial growth in the last few years. For example, the Indian economy has recovered from the turbulent economy and enjoyed a robust growth of 5% in the 2012 -2013 fiscal year. Moreover, the steady Indian economic growth will continue to provide the higher disposable income for consumers and assist people to upgrade their lifestyles. Thus, "a robust 400 million Indian middle class with growing disposable incomes has been instrumental in driving demand of various consumer electrical devices." "(Dhoot, 2015. p 2). Moreover, the number of nuclear families are increasing in India along with a rise in families with double digit income and having easy access to credit.
A report conducted by the Ernst & Young (2015) reveals that a domestic electrical appliance has recorded a substantial growth in the last few years due to the growth of the employment opportunities for the millions of Indians. Typically, the consumer electrical appliance has recorded growth rate of 28% . The factor responsible to the high growth rates is a significant increase in a local demand. Moreover, there is an increase in the demand for the electrical appliances in the rural areas. For example, 8% of the rural population own refrigerators, which the A-CAT has been able to explore in the last few decades. In essence, the demand for electrical home appliance in the rural areas has recorded a 30% growth rate. Dhoot, (2015) contributes to the argument by pointing out that A-CAT can take the advantages of the growth rate in refrigerators because India has been able to records sales of 14 million units of refrigerators in 2013."Key growth drivers are lower prices and rising demand for frost-free refrigerators. Fridges with a capacity range of 142-340 liters dominated fridge sales over the review period, representing 74% of total volume sales." (Dhoot, 2015 p 11). Thus, the A-CAT can exploit the aforementioned market opportunities of the electrical appliance in India.
Threat: A-CAT is facing a stiff competition from both internal and external manufacturers of the electrical appliance in India. Typically, the giant electrical manufacturers such as Samsung, and LG dominate the market of electrical appliance in India. Moreover, A-CAT is facing a market threat from electrical producers from China because of large imports from China is threating the growth rate of local producers of electrical appliances. For example, India imports 39% of its refrigerators from China in 2014. Heavy taxation on electrical alliance is another threat facing the A-CAT. The present total tax incidence is between 25% and 30% compared to tariffs levied by other Asian countries, which are between 7 and 17%.
B. Problem Statement Addressing Given Problem and Quantifiable Measures
The outcomes of the analysis reveal that A-CAT has faced challenges in penetrating the urban market despite the presence of the market opportunities among the urban population. Moreover, the company faces challenges to compete with the international manufacturers of electrical appliance in China. The threat of suppliers are the other problem facing the company. Typically, suppliers can increase its prices if the demand of transformers are not being maintained. Moreover, the A-CAT has not also been to take the advantages of past data to enhance market advantages. The vice-president believes that the current structure needs to be corrected because the company is required to implement effective production to meet the demand. The correct measure is to use the sale figures of the past two years to make a forecast to meet the normal production level of transformers. Despite the aforementioned sales forecast, the company faces challenges in increasing the production level of voltage regulator between 2009 and 2010 because the average production level of voltage regulator is likely to reach 1,101.2 in 2010. Moreover, the sale figures of the transformers were likely to reach 27,458 at the end of the 2010 fiscal year. Thus, the A-CAT is required to adjust its production capacity to meet the projected demand.
C. Strategy to Addresses the Problem and Method to improve Sustainable Operational Processes
A-CAT should devise the strategy to develop power over suppliers. The company should source for suppliers through the internet to HAVE power over the suppliers of the transformers. The A-CAT should not rely on local suppliers for the production of the appliances, rather, it should rely on multiple suppliers to enjoy a low cost of production. For example, sourcing the materials from China will make the A-CAT to enjoy the low cost of production. Moreover, A-CAT should employ more labor in the manufacturing department to assist the company to meet the rush order. The adjustment would assist the company to meet the forecasted demand of the transformer since the sales figures are likely to increase between 2009 and 2010.
III: Identification of the Statistical Tools to Collect Data
D. Justification of tool for the Data Analysis
The chosen tools will assist in making effective decision on the number of transformers that the company will produce in a given year. It is essential to realize that some functional departments in the company were questioning the policy of keeping a big stock of transformer in the inventory since the transformers are part of the principal components of the voltage regulators. Thus, the descriptive statistics will assist in comparing the mean data of the transformers and voltage regulators. The data collected will assist in making a decision about the number of transformer to produce for the 2009 and 2010. The ANOVA statistical will also help the company to understand whether the sales of the transformer and voltage regulators are increasing or decreasing. The ANOVA will also assist the operations manager to test the hypothesis, which will assist in making an effective decision about the number of transformer and voltage regulators to produce in the forthcoming years.
E. The Best Quantitative method Informing Data-driven Decisions
The quantitative method is a method of using of the statistical tool to make an effective decision. The Mean is the best form of the quantitative method used to develop the average value of the data, and the Mean is the best tool to make an effective decision. Moreover, the study will use statistical technique using the graphical illustration to make decision. For example, the histogram allows the company to develop a big picture about the overall data. The visual presentation of the data will assist in evaluating the sales performance in the past years, and the historical data will help the company to forecast the sales for the 2009 and 2010.
IV. Data Analysis to determine the Appropriate Decision
A. process needed for the Statistical Analysis
The process needed for the data analysis is to collect the historical data of the transformer to test the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis:
Ha: "The mean number of the transformers required exceeds 1000 transformers." "
The study collects the historical data for the period of 2006- 2010 to test the hypothesis, and the data are presented below:
Transformers Dataset
ta
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Average
801,1667
898,6667
990,3333
1083,667
1101,167
Afterwards, the paper carries out the descriptive statistics of the transformer dataset, and the table below provides the outcome of the descriptive statistics. The 2010 Mean value has made the study to reject the null hypothesis because the Mean of transformers for the 2010 exceed 1000 (Mean=1101.16)
Descriptive Statistics
Transformer Voltage Regulators
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Mean
801,1667
898,6667
990,3333
1083,5
1101,167
Standard Error
24,18766
39,52853
41,95025
44,64651
39,649
Median
1045,5
1140,5
Mode
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Standard Deviation
83,78851
136,9309
145,3199
154,66
137,3482
Sample Variance
7020,515
18750,06
21117,88
23919,73
18864,52
Kurtosis
-1,62662
-0,60905
-0,85282
-0,83045
-1,10512
Skewness
0,122258
0,77195
0,649615
0,561198
-0,34583
Range
Minimum
Maximum
Sum
10784
11884
13002
13214
Count
12
12
12
12
12
Confidence Level (95,0%)
53,23668
87,00172
92,33187
98,2663
87,26685
The output of the ANOVA single factor makes this study to also reject the null hypothesis because F> F crit where the F=10.71 and F crit =2.54.
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Count
Sum
Average
Variance
2006
12
801,1667
7020,515
2007
12
10784
898,6667
18750,06
2008
12
11884
990,3333
21117,88
2009
12
13004
1083,667
23873,7
2010
12
13214
1101,167
18864,52
ANOVA
Source of Variation
SS
df
MS
F
P-value
F crit
Between Groups
768076,7
4
192019,2
10,71217
1,72E-06
2,539689
Within Groups
985893,3
55
17925,33
Total
1753970
59
Moreover, the study collects the quarterly sales figures for the refrigerators as being revealed as follows:
Sales Figures for the Refrigerators
Quarter
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
I
II
III
IV
Sum
16102
17876
21055
24870
27458
The fig 1 reveals an increase in the quarterly sale figure of the refrigerator between 2006 and 2010. The annual total sales figures of the refrigerator increase yearly as being revealed in Fig 1.
Fig 1: Sales Figure for the Refrigerators
B. Process leads to the Valid Data-driven Decisions
"Validity is defined as the extent to which a concept is accurately measured in a quantitative study." (Heale, & Twycross, 2015 p 1). For example, the study collects data on the sales figures of the refrigerators to measure whether the sales of the refrigerators would be more than 1000 units by the 2010. Thus, the data collected provides the validity that enhances the decision making because the operation manager has been able to understand that the sales figures are more than 1,000 in 2010.
C. Analyzing the Data Sets for the reliability of Results
"A reliability, or the accuracy of an instrument. In other words, the extent to which a research instrument consistently has the same results if it is used in the same situation on repeated occasions." (Heale, & Twycross, 2015 p 1). The study uses the Mean value and ANOVA single factor as the research instruments. The research results are reliable because the instrument will provide the same results using the same data or related data. (Korb, 2012).
D. Data-driven Decision to address given Problem
The data analysis has been able to address the given problem because the management is able to understand the number of transformer that will be needed to meet the company demand. Moreover, the operation manager is able to understand that the refrigerators will increase by more than 1000 units in 2010. The results will assist the management to plan the production of the transformers, which will meet the market demand.
V. Recommendation of the Operational Improvements to the Stakeholders
A. Plan Analysis plan for both internal and external stakeholders
The internal stakeholders are the vice president, operation manager, manufacturing manager, purchasing manager, sales managers and other employees. The decision of the management generally affects the internal stakeholders. For example, increase in the company profitability will improve employee earnings and the earnings of the other internal stakeholders. The external stakeholders are the suppliers, customers and the government. A reduction in the costs of production will make the company to offer low product prices to the customers that will consequently increase the sales figures.
B. Method Decision addresses the given Problem
The outcome of the hypothesis has revealed that the production will increase by more than 1000 units in 2010. The data analysis has assisted the operation manager and vice president to increase the production of transformer, which will make the company to reach the sale figures for the 2010. Moreover, the decision will assist the company to keep adequate stock needed to meet the market demand.
C. Justification the Decision address the Given Problem
The decision is the best option because the operation manager will be able to plan effective production system for the company. Moreover, the management will be able to reduce the costs of managing the inventory, which will consequently reduce the price of products offered to the consumer.
Reference
Dhoot, A.V. (2015). Opportunities and Challenges in Consumer Electronics & Home Appliances. CEAMA. Consumer Electronics and Appliances Manufacturers Association.
Ernst & Young (2015).Study on Indian electronics and consumer durables segment (AC, refrigerators, washing machines, TVs). Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
Heale, R. & Twycross, A.(2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid-Based Nurs:1-3.
Korb, K. (2012). Conducting Educational Research. Validity of Instruments. 2012. Korbed. Psychology
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.