Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Insanity' Defense
The John Hinckley Trial and the Impact on the Insanity Defense
Purpose of Insanity Defense
The theory that suffices the insanity defense involves the norm that most individuals can choose to follow the law. However, mental instability deprives individuals the ability to make rationale choices thereby they cannot be held accountable for their actions. Such groups of persons require special treatment as opposed to detention in prisons. The use of various forms of punishment does not necessarily deter future antisocial conduct of such mental unstable individuals. In the ancient Roman society, legal codes distinguished between the sane and insane individuals depicting accountability and unaccountability of actions respectively.
The Aftermath of the John Hinckley Defense
Backlash and Reform
In the John Hinckley case, the jury found the accused not guilty by the reason of insanity. As a result, backlash and public outcry emanated following the ruling. The ruling following the accused attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan raised eyebrows, and it stunned the majority of the Americans. After the Hinckley's verdict, insanity reforms amounting to eighty percent occurred between 1978 and 1990 (Linder, 2008). The reforms targeted limiting the use of insanity as a defense approach.
In the...
The reshaping of the cognitive dimension distinguishes between a total lack of partial comprehension and understanding.
"The Guilty but Mentally Ill (GBMI)" verdict adopted in various states rendered offenders guilty despite their unstable mental states.
"The Burden Of Proof Shifts" holds the defendants to higher standards requiring convincing and clear evidence as a proof of insanity.
"Limiting The Use of Expert Witness" verdict depicted laws that limited the use of psychiatric testimonies in insanity trials.
"Abolition of the Insanity Defense" judgment represented the elimination of the use of insanity defense in its entirety in the states of Utah, Montana, and Idaho (Linder, 2008).
Lorena Bobbitt Case
The jury in the case acquitted the accused by the reason of temporary insanity. The jury agreed that an "irresistible impulse" triggered the abuse on the defendant compelled her action of cutting off her husband's penis. Lorena was sent to a mental hospital for examination and observation. The defense lawyers argued that the case was more than the act of chopping off the penis as it engulfed more on life. As required by the state of Virginia law, a jury placed Mrs. Bobbitt in custody to…
References
Linder D. (2008). The John Hinckley Trial 1982. Famous American Trials. Retrieved from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/hinckley/hinckleyaccount.html
Margolick, David (22 January 1994). Lorena Bobbitt Acquitted In Mutilation of Husband. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1994/01/22/us/lorena-bobbitt-acquitted-in-mutilation-of-husband.html
Forensic Mental Health Legislation and Policies As a probation and parole officer in Australia, one of the major issues that need to be addressed through best practice is dealing with mentally ill offenders. This is an emerging issue to be dealt with in order to provide suitable programs and support to lessen recidivism. The significance of addressing this issue is evident in the substantial attention given to offenders with mental illness
This is the view that gives basis to the Routine Activity Theory, in which the rational choice theory gives young criminal actors a way of justifying criminal behaviors. The rational choice theory works from the idea that for many juvenile offenders, illegal behaviors are not undertaken in idle but instead are the result of a carefully constructed weighing of the possible gains and consequences. The model in question "is
Powell points to the fact that "in Georgia, for example, the time between the date of the murder and the murderer's execution (if it occurs) averages close to I0 years 25 Although the average lapsed time in Georgia may be the highest, the same situation generally prevails in a number of other states. No one would suggest that this is satisfactory." (Powell, 1038) Indeed, according to Calvert (1993) it demonstrates
Fault: An Alternative to the Current Tort-Based System in England and Wales The United Kingdom statistics regarding claims THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM OBSTACLES TO DUE PROCESS THE CASE FOR REFORM THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT THE RISING COST OF LITIGATION LORD WOOLF'S REFORMS MORE COST CONTROLS THE UNITED STATES PAUL'S PULLOUT THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY TORT REFORM IN AMERICA FLEEING PHYSICIANS STATISTICS FOR ERROR, INJURY AND DEATH THE CALL FOR REFORM IN 2003: A FAMILIAR REFRAIN THE UNITED STATES SITUATION, IN SUMMARY NEW ZEALAND CASE STUDIES THE SWEDISH SCHEME COMPARISON: WHICH SYSTEM IS
Clinical Psychology Dissertation - Dream Content as a Therapeutic Approach: Ego Gratification vs. Repressed Feelings An Abstract of a Dissertation Dream Content as a Therapeutic Approach: Ego Gratification vs. Repressed Feelings This study sets out to determine how dreams can be used in a therapeutic environment to discuss feelings from a dream, and how the therapist should engage the patient to discuss them to reveal the relevance of those feelings, in their present,
Psychology Discussion: Psychopathology Read the introduction to Reading 1: Beaver, Rowland, Schwartz & Nedelec (2011). The genetic origins of psychopathic personality traits in adult males and females: Results from an adoption-based study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 426-432. Characterise psychopathy: What are the defining features? Psychopathy is a disorder of the personality that based on three prongs of traits: affective, behavioral, and interpersonal. Perhaps because they are so striking, are observed early in