Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
The Battery Production Conundrum: Tesla's Outsourcing Strategy and Contingency Planning
Introduction
Outsourcing has become a prevalent business strategy, allowing companies to focus on their core competencies while benefiting from cost efficiencies. However, it also introduces new risks and complexities into the supply chain, necessitating comprehensive contingency planning. This paper explores the case of Tesla Inc., an electric vehicle manufacturer that relies heavily on outsourcing for its battery production. It investigates the major problem faced by the company regarding managing risks associated with outsourcing and formulating robust contingency measures. Using the framework suggested by de Kluyver (2012), this case analysis proposes potential solutions, outlines a preferred strategy, and provides an implementation plan.
Major Facts
Tesla is a pioneer in the electric vehicle industry, but it relies significantly on outsourcing its battery cell production for its EVs. Key suppliers like Panasonic and LG Chem have played an important part in Tesla's supply chain (Bridge & Faigen, 2022). The companys dependence on external suppliers exposes it to various risks, however, including supplier reliability, quality control, geopolitical issues, logistical complications, and intellectual property protection (Richert & Dudek, 2023). Recognizing these risks, Tesla announced a strategic shift towards in-house battery production, signaling a significant change in their supply chain strategy (Wang et al., 2022). This move, although challenging, could serve as a contingency measure to mitigate risks related to outsourced production (Cabigiousu, 2022).
Major Problem
The primary problem Tesla faces is balancing the efficiency and cost advantages of outsourcing with the risks it presents. The central question is, how can Tesla manage the risks associated with outsourcing its battery cell production and ensure robust contingency measures?
Possible Solutions
One option is for Tesla to continue relying on current suppliers. This approach takes advantage of established relationships and potential cost savings. However, it also exposes Tesla to the risks of supplier dependence, potential quality issues, and geopolitical and logistical vulnerabilities.
An alternative option is to diversify suppliers, sourcing from multiple vendors across different geographical regions....…reliability and adherence to quality standards. Negotiations with these suppliers should prioritize quality assurance, delivery schedules, and intellectual property protection. Tesla should then begin to transition a portion of battery production to these new suppliers while maintaining relationships with existing ones. At the same time, Tesla should invest in research and development to build in-house battery production capabilities. As these capabilities improve, Tesla can gradually increase in-house production with the ultimate goal of self-sufficiency in battery production.
Conclusion
Managing the dynamics of outsourcing is a complex task that requires strategic planning and effective risk management. The case of Tesla, with its reliance on external suppliers for battery production, highlights the challenges and risks associated with outsourcing. However, by diversifying suppliers and developing in-house production capabilities, Tesla can strike a balance between leveraging the benefits of outsourcing and mitigating its associated risks. This hybrid approach represents a pragmatic solution that can enhance Tesla's resilience and secure its supply chain in the face of uncertainties. As Tesla continues to…
References
Bridge, G., & Faigen, E. (2022). Towards the lithium-ion battery production network: Thinking beyond mineral supply chains. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102659.
Cabigiosu, A. (2022). Sustainable development and incumbents' open innovation strategies for a greener competence?destroying technology: The case of electric vehicles. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 2315-2336.
de Kluyver, C. A. (2012). Fundamentals of Global Strategy. Saylor Foundation. Retrieved from https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_fundamentals-of-global-strategy/s10-02-to-outsource-or-not-to-outsour.html
Supply Chain There are several different attributes of supply chain management. Among them, some stand out as being more important than other. Key aspects of supply chain management include technology, communication/coordination, inventory control and bargaining power (EAUC, 2014). Bargaining power is important because it dictates the terms and conditions of the supply chain. If the buyer has more bargaining than the seller, then the terms will reflect more on the needs of
(Reza, 2009) This information is building off of the findings from Uthayakumar. This is illustrating how the two tier system can help to streamline operations. However, as time goes by these ideas will become obsolete. The reason why is because they are focusing on particular aspect of supply chain management (i.e. during emergencies and backlogs). Where is it is failing, is through understanding how this strategy could be used when
Supply chain management (SCM) is a method for alleviating the way one company finds the raw materials and other components that it requires to produce a product or service and provide it to its customers. The five basic components of Supply Chain Management are planning, source, making, delivering and return. If supply chain standards are applied then the supply chain management could benefit from it a great deal and it
Tesla Motors became a public traded company, (NASDAQ stock quote code: TSLA), earlier this year. You are the Channels Manager for Tesla Motors. How do you think Tesla has developed its distribution strategy, i.e. what were the most important things to have been considered? With the launch of the model S. sedan due in 2012, how would you further develop the distribution strategy over the next five years, and why? Tesla
Tesla Motors has a cash flow problem, which makes it vulnerable to the many larger competitors who want into the electric vehicle business. The advantage Tesla has is with its battery technology, which is vastly superior to anybody else's, and in its brand name and leadership. The in-house distribution is unique to the industry but it might be too early to determine whether this is helping Tesla or hurting it.
Tesla Motors was founded in 2003 "by a group of engineers in Silicon Valley who wanted to prove that electric cars could be better than gasoline-powered cars." The company's first car, the Roadster, was launched in 2008 and the second car, the Model S, was launched in 2012. The company has been a major success since its inception, and while it still is not turning a profit, its revenues are