Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Brown v. Board of Education
In the opinion of this paper, there is no doubt at all that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in May, 1954 -- Brown v. Board of Education -- changed the nation in a very positive way. And it changed the nation not just in the sense of setting the wheels in motion to end school segregation, but by bringing justice to one segment of the American population that was ultimately a positive for the whole nation. Brown v. Board of Education was a confirmation that the U.S. Constitution was still the guiding democratic principle -- that it had not been permanently abandoned in the south by the cruel racist policies during the Jim Crow era. This paper reviews and critiques the Brown v. Board of Education (referred to in this paper as just "Brown") decision, the reactions to Brown, the resistance to Brown, and ultimately the positives that resulted from Brown.
Reasons why Brown v. Board of Education Brought Positives to the Nation
A personal essay by Dr. William B. Harvey presents a first-hand account of what it was like to be an African-American boy growing up in North Carolina in the 1950s. Actually, Harvey was 6 years old when Brown was ruled on by the High Court. At six years of age, Harvey was "…keenly aware of segregation and what it meant" as he attended a racially segregated elementary school (Harvey, 2005). "Segregation was mean and ugly and humiliating. It was a state of affairs that made you know your place and that kept you in your place." If you happened to be black, "…your place was at the bottom," Harvey remembered on page 43. He recalls having textbooks that had been used by white students but given to the black segregated schools "…when [the white] schools received new ones" (45).
Harvey writes that he had an "epiphany of sorts" on a field trip in North Carolina. The University of North Carolina planetarium in Chapel Hill allowed "…the little colored children of the state" to visit one day a month, and he was fascinated with the "…astrological phenomena" and was "quite taken" by the exploration of the cosmos by huge telescopes...
While walking across campus, back to the school bus "…it occurred to me that I could not be a student at this wonderful institution, which was supported by taxes paid by my parents" (44). He was given to wonder what the "…learned professors were saying to their students" in classes like history, ethics, and political science, about "…the incredible duality that existed outside the windows of the classroom" (44). What Harvey saw during the period of segregated schools -- even after Brown became law -- was a nation that "…provided liberty and justice for some" (44).
Brown v. Board of Education was Sabotaged at the Outset
Just because the High Court ruled that "separate but equal" was not constitutional when it comes to education doesn't mean that southern states would obey the federal law. In fact the response was anything but cooperative; it was quite the contrary, in fact. Congress and the president were "…unenthusiastic about implementing the decision," according to Michael J. Klarman, the James Monroe Professor of Law and Professor of History at the University of Virginia.
How would Brown be enforced? That was one of the big questions; meanwhile the "…white South declared war on the Court, nullified Brown, and deployed state troops and encouraged vigilante mobs to block the enforcement of desegregation order" (Klarman, 2007). The good news in the aftermath of Brown was that politicians in the north and south were forced to "…take a position on the issue," so Brown clearly "…had an effect" and it "…also plainly inspired blacks (Klarman). Southern blacks filed lawsuits in Mississippi and South Carolina seeking real integration based on Brown, giving them some power and hope that justice was possible. Klarman explains that Brown "…played a role in generating direct action and in shaping the responses it received from white southerners"; importantly, in terms of the positives that emerged following Brown, the "…hopes and expectations of black Americans" were raised, and those hopes were turned into the realization…
Works Cited
Armor, David J. "Brown and Black-White Achievement." Academic Questions, 2006.
CORE. "Brown vs. Board of Education." Retrieved May 15, 2013, from http://www.core-online.org.
Harvey, William B. "A Bi-generational Narrative On The Brown Vs Board Decision." The
Negro Educational Review, 56.1 (2005): 43-49.
Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in Re Waterman, 910 2D (N.H. 2006) The Case The case addressed in this section of the report is that of Supreme Court case In Re Waterman, 910 A.2d 1175 (N.H. 2006). In this case, Tracy Waterman, working as a trooper for the New Hampshire State Policy was informed on August 29, 3003 that Vicky Lemere, the wife of one of Waterman's fellow troopers, informed Lieutenant Nedeau,
Components of this act that have been targeted towards advanced nursing practitioners include a lifting of the limits for how much money can be spent on doctoral programs for nurses (No author, 2011). Most advanced practice nurses have a master's degree; the removal of the cap for funding for doctoral programs will almost certainly allow these professionals to complete more doctoral degrees, increase their breadth of knowledge, and provide
For example, he voted to require that schools utilize resources to support religions activities if they designate resources to non-religious activities (Board of Education. v. Mergens, 1990). Further, Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) called for vouchers to be given to families of low socioeconomic standing for both religious and secular educational institutions. This being said, Rehnquist was not able to completely disrupt the social change that Warren had started in
The plaintiffs were disabled Tennesseans who could not access the upper floors in state courthouses. They sued in Federal Court, arguing that since Tennessee was disallowing them public services for the reason that their disabilities, it was infringing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Tennessee argued that the Eleventh Amendment banned the suit, and filed a motion to dismiss the case. It relied chiefly on Board
S. Supreme Court might have held the status of this particular land and the resulting court decision to different standards and might have even reversed decisions of law however, the failure of this point to be addressed in the previous petition barred this point from being addressed by the court in the latter decision. Bibliography City of Sherrill, New York v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al. Certiorari to the
However, this Court also recognizes that mental illness oftentimes differs from other immutable characteristics, such as mental retardation and age, in that a defendant oftentimes has the ability to control mental illness through medical interventions. While there is tremendous evidence of Panetti's deteriorated mental state, there is very little evidence to support Panetti's assertions that he was insane at the time of the murders. Though there are serious questions regarding