Illegal immigration is often looked at from a United States perspective and a lot of the material and subjects looked at are done in an unfair or incomplete manner. However, "The Other Side of Immigration" looks at the subject from a Mexican point of view and depicts how towns become half-empty in Mexico due to people going to American and why they do it.
¶ … Immigration
The author of this report is asked to watch, summarize and assess the implications and points made by the documentary titled The Other Side of Immigration by Roy Germano. In addition to that, the author is asked to offer opinions and analysis of whether or how reform in the United States should be structured, how the a guest worker program should be structured, what is slowing down immigration reform in Washington and whether there is a negative impact caused by illegal immigration in the United States. Lastly, the author will point to the portrayal of the immigrants in the movie and whether there is a bias involved with the documentary.
Review of Film
In watching the film, the basic premise and summary of the film is that the illegal or even legal immigrants from Mexico and the struggle they face as well as the reasons why the keep trying to get to the United States. The film clearly focuses on the human side of illegal immigration and softens the image that a lot of people impose regarding illegal immigration. The film takes a much more open view and does a very good job of posing the different sides of the argument while including details and perspectives that are often omitted when the topic is discussed in the blogosphere or the broader media.
Any reform should be in the form of broad immigration reform and this would include securing the border, establishing a guest worker program and handling the legal status of the illegal immigrants currently in the United States. Doing the guest worker program and securing the border tightly would be essential and the established rules would have to be followed consistently or the framework would be rampantly abused. The reason for this is quite clear in that mass legalization of illegal immigrants has been done twice since the 1960's and the problem is still progressing unabated.
Once the reform is in place, any and all illegal immigrants that do not come forward and legalize their status when given the chance should be deported barring a major reason why not. Felons and people with extensive misdemeanor past should be deported as well because working and living in the United States is a privilege, not a right. Lastly, whatever is necessary to secure the borders, up to and including putting the military and/or the National Guard on the border while the fences and other physical barriers are strengthened, should be done as a porous border (and this includes both the Mexican border and the Canadian border) is security risk. It is true that Latinos are not typically involved in risks to the republic but people of all backgrounds cross those two borders at one time or another.
As for what is slowing down reform in Washington, it is a confluence of different and competing issues. Some lawmakers take a "rule or law" stance that, at least in some cases, borders on xenophobia or even racism. However, believing in the idea that people should obey the law, in and of itself, is not wrong. Others suggest that compassion should be allowed for and that a worker program and mass legalization, at least one more time, should be done because deporting 12 million illegal immigrants is a logistical impossibility. Others still are clearly pandering politically to people that could potentially become citizens down the road and/or to the families of illegals that are already legal citizens. Many Latino advocacy groups will speak volumes about how allowing Latinos, legal or not, to work and live in the United States can and should be done irrespective of the laws on the books or at least in a way that makes them pliable. However, the more general reason why reform has not happened yet is political brinksmanship. Accusations of racism, pandering and lawlessness abound. Given the current spat with the debt limit and spending, it is clear that there is a massive chasm in this country between the right and left wings of political discourse and there is next to no sign that this will change unless there is a new period of time where a single part controls all three branches of the federal government, such as was the case when ObamaCare was passed between 2007 and 2011 as a result of Democrats controlling the House, Senate and Presidency.
You’re 77% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.