Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,469 words

Tolstoy's portrayal of Ivan Ilych's colleagues and their shallow responses to death

~8 min read 7 sections
Abstract

This paper examines the Death of Ivan Ilych by answering fifteen questions concerning the story by Tolstoy. It shows how the story's tone changes from beginning to end, and supplies motivations for Ivan's change in perspective. It discusses Ivan's illness and the causes for both his physical suffering and his spiritual relief.

✍️ How to write this paper — guide & tools ▾
Essay 1,469 words

Death of Ivan Ilych

Sum up the reactions of Ivan Ilych's colleagues to the news of his death. What is implied in Tolstoy's calling them "so-called friends"?

Ivan's colleagues are "so-called friends" because unlike true friends they have no real sympathy or empathy for Ivan, his life, or his soul. Their immediate concern is of promotions, who will be selected to take Ivan's place, and the amount of money the new position will bring in. They are superficial, worldly and materialistic. They admit to never seeing him ("I haven't been to see him since the holidays. I always meant to go.") unless a "holiday" custom demands it. Their true natures are summed up tersely with the thought that each one expresses: "Well, he's dead but I'm alive." Anyone so selfish cannot be a real friend, because the basis of friendship is selflessness.

What comic elements do you find in the account of the wake that Peter Ivanovich attends?

Peter's lack of sense is one of the comic elements of the account: "Peter Ivanovich continued to make the sign of the cross…afterwards, when it seemed to him that this movement of his arm in crossing himself had gone on too long, he stopped…" Peter is conscious only of externals and not of the actual meaning of the things he does. The fact that he feels reproached by Ivan's corpse and feels refreshed by Schwartz's ridiculous figure lends further humor to the account. In spite of the fact that he is at a wake, Schwartz shows that he is "above" his surroundings by taking out a pack of cards. It is funny because these men are wholly insensible to anything but their own shallow selves. They are out of place with these uncomfortable formalities regarding death.

3. In Tolstoy's description of the corpse and its expression, what details seem especially revealing and meaningful?

The fact that the face of the corpse conveys reproach is meaningful because it is as though Ivan is now delivering a message to his "friends" about the reality of life and death. He had been like them before his final suffering: he had only been interested in his career, in having a good time, etc. Now he has "gone to the other side." His features are hardened, sunken and yet "more dignified." Through death, Ivan has become a person of substance. His expression serves as a warning that one must take the life of the soul seriously. Those who don't take it seriously find this expression to be "out of place," as Peter does.

4. Do you think Tolstoy would have improved the story if he had placed the events in chronological order?

The opening scenes at the law courts and at the wake are essentially satirical and poke fun at the empty lives of Ivan's colleagues. The rest of the story is meant to show how Ivan passed from emptiness (or spiritual death) into fullness (or spiritual life), by, ironically, dying to himself. If Tolstoy had placed the beginning scenes at the end of the story for chronology's sake, the final tone of the story would have been satirical rather than spiritual and would have expressed an unintended reversal of tone and voice.

5. Would you call Ivan Ilych, when we first meet him, a religious man? Sum up his goals in life, his values, and his attitudes.

Ivan is certainly not a religious man. His goals are wholly concerned with this world, not with the next. He values his position in life, his estate, his affairs, his pleasures, and himself above all. His attitudes are superficial and somewhat mean. His father, brothers and sisters-in-law detest him: he has no friends, and yet he is not without conscience -- for example when he had done horrid things, he genuinely feels disgusted with himself, yet sees that others do them and that one must to get on with the world.

6. By what "virtues" and abilities does Ivan rise through the ranks?

He rises through the ranks by pursuing the same "ideals" as those of the earthly Court of Justice. He gets married because he believes it will give him pleasure and that it is the "acceptable" thing to do. He rises in the ranks when the "reforms" come and new men are needed. He is a good official and is promoted and transferred from Province to Province, and knows how to deal with both superiors and inferiors. He likes the power he is afforded with each new position and loves knowing he can crush others.

10. In what successive stages does Tolstoy depict Ivan's isolation?

Ivan's isolation at first removes him from work then from society. He tries to combat his fear of death by visiting others and maintaining a pretense of life (by being social) but he cannot quiet his fears and wants everyone to focus on his illness. Tolstoy shows how Ivan attempts to keep up appearances at court but cannot and finally shows him alone in a room with Gerasim, who represents a kind of saving grace for Ivan.

11. What are we supposed to admire in Gerasim?

Gerasim is meant to be admired for his patience, docility and above all humility. He is Tolstoy's personification of true charity, which gives all for others. Gerasim tends to Ivan without any ill will and moves Ivan to really consider how selfish he has been with his whole life.

12. What do you understand from Ivan's justification of his life?

Ivan does not want to admit to himself that he has been a selfish and uncaring man. He is too used to thinking well of himself and being pleased with himself. To accuse himself of sin is to make a confession -- and such a confession would release him from his suffering, but he cannot summon the strength to do so; pride is a hurdle for him and to kill his pride, he thinks, will kill him.

13. What is memorable in the character of Ivan's schoolboy son?

The schoolboy is "pathetic" in Ivan's eyes and this is part of his charm: he is not puffed up or full of himself like everyone else (except Gerasim). He seems to truly pity his father and understand his suffering. He shows fear and when he kisses Ivan's hand, Ivan finally realizes that he is not the only one suffering, that his family is suffering too and he for the first time, through the child, feels empathy and sympathy for others.

14. What realization allows Ivan to triumph?

The realization that he is the cause of others' unhappiness. He is humbled by his child's love, Gerasim's devotion, and his wife's presence. He sees that he should ask forgiveness and in his seeking pardon is the light at the end of the tunnel and relief from pain.

15. Is it possible to identify with Ivan?

It is very possible to identify with Ivan, if only the reader recognizes in him a reflection of his own selfishness, pride, and superficiality.

299 Words Hidden
7. Does the narrator sympathize with Ivan's attachment to his possessions?299 words
The tone of the passage (paragraph 104) is deeply empathetic. This entire portion of the story displays Tolstoy's sympathy and empathy for Ivan. Ivan is…
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Tolstoy's portrayal of Ivan Ilych's colleagues and their shallow responses to death. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/death-of-ivan-ilych-sum-86499

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.