Social Black Experience
A Survey of Black Social Oppression in the Twentieth Century
Evelyn Waugh noted in his "Conservative Manifesto" in Robbery Under Law (1940) that "inequalities of wealth and position are inevitable….Men naturally arrange themselves in a system of classes [and] such a system is necessary for any form of co-operative work, more particularly the work of keeping a nation together" (16-17). What happened in 20th century America, however, was the development of more than a mere system "of co-operative work." It was a system of outright slavery, propagated by an elitist element of American society, as E. Michael Jones has chronicled to great extent in numerous works. This paper will analyze how the American government has gone beyond the strictures of the natural arrangement of class and racial hierarchy, (often secretly) employing methods of controlling the African-American population in an attempt to uphold its investment in the social order. What should have been a system of natural co-operation has turned into a system of unnatural control and social black oppression.
In 1913, John B. Watson was detailing the specifics of behaviorism at Columbia University and cubism was invading the cultural sphere of American art through Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase. Both would play an indirect but important role in the reduction of the role of the African-American -- the former through scientific experiment, the latter through radicalism in art. Both science and art in America were funded largely by the moneyed elite -- and the ideals of the moneyed elite were largely synonymous with those of the WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) establishment. What both essentially taught was a page out of the book of the Marquis de Sade, whose writings from the time of the French Revolution had never ceased to have a hold over the literary public. The lesson was this: undesirable groups of people could be controlled through a single aspect of human nature that, when pushed towards excess (as Huxley showed in Brave New World), enslaved mankind to its passions. That passion was sex -- and both behaviorism and cubism were a kind of prelude to the marginalization of "undesirables" in America (Jones 131).
W.E.B. Du Bois, over a decade earlier, however, had already begun an examination into what was beginning to be known as the "Negro problem." For Du Bois that problem was the maltreatment of blacks through inequality, poverty, and lack of social standing. For the American elite, it was a problem of escalating numbers -- as Du Bois points out early in The Philadelphia Negro: "The Negroes, as an element in the total population of the city, are growing in numbers more rapidly than the whites" (xii).
The black population and the Catholic population (increasing through emigration) both posed a threat to the ruling classes. The link between science, art, and the control of the "undesirables" was the decades long funding (by, in particular, the Rockefeller foundation) of men such as Eddie Bernays, nephew of none other than Sigmund Freud and the founding father of American advertising and PR.
The sexual liberation that occurred in Greenwich Village in the early twentieth century would be repeated in Harlem decades later, and then pumped into the mainstream with the advent of the Sixties revolution and rock 'n' roll, which found its inspiration in the black jazz era that preceded it. Jazz had been promoted by the literati, ("Jazz is orgasm," as Norman Mailer stated in "The White Negro" -- a remark that cut through to the heart of the role that sexual revolution played in the decline of black moral standards and subsequent enslavement) just like women's smoking had been promoted by Bernays. "Bernays tried to manipulate the country collectively through the mass media, by means of advertising and public relations" (Jones 135). The black population, as it would be throughout the whole of the twentieth century, was essentially the guinea pig for such experiments.
Experimentation on the black population did not stop, however, with the patronage of black poets like Claude McKay, a Jamaican writer who had helped initiate the Harlem Renaissance with Harlem Shadows and Home to Harlem in the 1920s. It continued and intensified under the banners of science and control. The Tuskegee experiments in which blacks were injected with syphilis and Project MKULTRA were later examples of the estimation and worth of blacks in the eyes of the scientific community. McKay, however, served as a forerunner of the kind of societal manipulation, with which the liberal white elites and their WASP counterparts exercised over the black minority. At once exploited and oppressed, blacks in the twentieth century have been treated as puppets in the hands of social reformers (such as the socialists of the first half of the century) who, like Margaret Sanger, used them to gain a foothold on the political scene -- only to abandon them once that foothold was established. (Sanger had fought for equal rights and fair pay just long enough to become heard -- then she focused solely on crusading for the eugenicists, who (like in Germany) sought to put into the hands of "undesirables" the very birth control that would deplete their numbers. To people like Sanger, birth control was viewed as the liberal fulfillment of "sex without consequences." To people like Eleanor Dwight Jones, head of the American Birth Control League in 1930, it was a campaign to preserve the white race:
We…are concentrating on the practical work of making it possible for the lower social classes to practice birth control. For the good of the race, people of poor stock -- incompetent and sickly -- should have few or no children, and fortunately they want few or no children. In this matter private interest is in accord with public interest. That is the strength of the birth control movement. (Jones 279)
Social conditioning (as devised by men like Watson decades earlier) was meeting social engineering. Through the art and "Renaissance" of the early part of the century (patronized by the international community seeking to control the "undesirables" of the world), the black population of America had been rendered loose from its Protestant moorings, which (thanks to the persuasion of the liberal element) it now viewed as "white" and part of the character of the "oppressor." McKay, for one, gave voice to such a view -- and was commended for it -- even to the point of being invited by the Soviet regime in Moscow to serve as a kind of poster boy for liberation from the old world of prudery and the induction of sexual revolution.
Imported into the States as a kind of protege of the liberal white elite (like Max Eastman), McKay rejected his own Protestant roots, which he had received in his Jamaican upbringing, in favor of the new liberal revolution underway in New York. The new morality, embodied in Harlem, quickly made its repercussions known: McKay contracted syphilis, manifested while abroad in Spain -- an event which sparked a new direction in his life, and a return to religious morality. McKay converted from liberal socialism to Catholicism, and upon return to America was essentially ostracized from the literati which once upheld him. When McKay ceased to be the black poster boy of liberation (aka sexual slavery, ruining, as Thomas Merton would point out later, the lives of blacks all over places like Harlem), he ceased to be useful to the white elite. However, like the eugenics campaign of the Third Reich in Germany, the push for control of the black population did not require poster boys -- it had the funding of monopolists to back the science that would write the book on social engineering in the latter half of the century. As Jones notes:
On December 26, 1945, [Arthur] Packard [head of the Davison Fund] wrote to Morris Hadley of Planned Parenthood, informing him that John D. Rockefeller III had made a contribution of $2,500 to support PP's Harlem Project, which was 'to provide an example for other Negro populated communities' on how to reduce their numbers through the use of contraception…Again, in spite of the war and the bad name Hitler had given eugenics and the name change to evade association with it, Planned Parenthood was still talking the eugenic line. (Jones 288)
De-population, of course, was only one method of control. Outright experimentation with drugs and disease was another.
The Final Report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Legacy Committee, filed on 20 May 1996 outlined an incident in recent American history that illustrates the point of this paper perfectly well:
From 1932 to 1972, 399 poor black sharecroppers in Macon County, Alabama were denied treatment for syphilis and deceived by physicians of the United States Public Health Service. As part of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, designed to document the natural history of the disease, these men were told that they were being treated for "bad blood." In fact, government officials went to extreme lengths to insure that they received no therapy from any source. As reported by the New York Times on 26 July 1972, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study was revealed as "the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history." (Adams et al.)
What the report went on to show was how a decades long deception was practiced on a race that was viewed primarily as a guinea pig for medical science.
The Tuskegee Institute had been established by Booker T. Washington. Claude McKay had passed through there in 1912 to study agriculture (under the patronage of Walter Jekyll, a man who provided the basis for Robert Louis Stevenson's classic horror tale character). Around the same time that Eleanor Dwight Jones was striving to preserve the white race, the United States Public Health Service began the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. What took place was a forty year analysis of the life of syphilis. The two hundred black men who had syphilis were "deliberately denied treatment" (Adams et al.) in what was just one more step in oppression and callous social engineering.
And at the same time the Tuskegee experiment was going on, W.E.B. Du Bois was focusing on the "Negro problem" again -- only now in Africa. Missing the social ramifications of the elitist platform that reduced life to a Malthusian principle and an economic conundrum, Du Bois failed to recognize where the dagger was hiding. Economics were only part of the problem for the plight of the Negro. The overwhelming portion of that problem was the elitist culture that served as a kind of prop for Du Bois himself. As long as he continued to say things like, "Unless this question of racial status is frankly and intelligently faced, it will become a problem not simply of Africa but of the world," ("The Realities in Africa" 231), he was no threat to the liberal white establishment. As soon as one began to attack the ethos at the heart of WASP America, he had to be silenced (like McKay and Eldridge Cleaver after him).
One-time leader of the Black Panthers, Cleaver would become the ex-Panther ex-con author of Soul on Fire -- a kind of Christian apologetic and a 180 degree turn from his book Soul on Ice written over a decade earlier while incarcerated for rape. Once Cleaver became a revolutionary in the opposite direction (away from the rhetoric backed by the cultural elite), he ceased to hold any import in the realm of politics, and he was forgotten by the liberal movement that had formed behind him. The anger that Cleaver represented before his conversion, however, had been a by-product of Malcolm X's crusade to bring violent revolution to the streets of urban America. Violence, of course, has always played right into the hands of those willing to take control. The French Revolution produced Napoleon. The Civil Rights movement did nothing more than cement the walls protecting the American oligarchy: as William Julius Wilson notes, "African-Americans still have the highest rates of concentrated poverty of all groups in the United States" (58). Such is not by accident, but by careful organization of the ruling class. Yet such would seem to be untrue: After all, the counter-culture movement that took place from the Sixties onward seemed to have the Negro at the heart of it -- but the Negro had always been used as the puppet of the oligarchy. When that puppet threatened to step out of line, the oligarchy had tricks to snap it back into place.
Such was exactly what happened with Project MKULTRA. In 1977, Sen. Edward Kennedy testified before the Ninety-Fifth Congress following "reports of the abuses of the drug testing program and reports of other previously unknown drug programs and projects for behavioral control" ("Project MKULTRA" 2). What the Senate Health Subcommittee uncovered, according to Kennedy, was
Chilling testimony about the human experimentation activities of the Central Intelligence Agency. The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over 30 universities and institutions were involved in an 'extensive testing and experimentation' which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens…Several of these tests involved the administration of LSD to 'unwitting subjects in social institutions.' ("Project MKULTRA" 2)
The death of Dr. Frank Olson in 1953 was one of the early signs of the operation. Richard Helms, director of the CIA, would two decades later consign all records of the Project to the flames. But a deeper probe revealed that the number of universities involved in the experiment was nearly one hundred. Kennedy put the matter bluntly: "The Central Intelligence Agency drugged American citizens without their knowledge or consent. It used university facilities and personnel without their knowledge. It funded leading researchers, often without their knowledge" ("Project MKULTRA" 3). The question was why?
Mark Stahlman pointed to the English conspiracy, which paralleled the WASP elitist mindset of cuius region, eius religio.
Al Hubbard…the Johnny Appleseed of LSD…renounced his U.S. citizenship and sailed right up to Vancouver…where he set up the world war-room to target the destruction of Western culture (through San Francisco) and from this base…he joined forces with Humphrey Osmond (English military psychiatrist, lead English MK-ULTRA researcher and the originator of the term 'psychedelic') and Aldous Huxley…to spread LSD among the intelligentsia to achieve the world revolution. To be sure, San Francisco's cultural scene has long been shaped by its close association with English intellectuals and social engineers. (Stahlman)
Jones, going back to the death of Dr. Olson, however, sees it as a continuation of the policy of the ruling powers of America to control, manipulate and marginalize rather than co-operate: and at the heart of it was the subjugation and/or elimination of "undesirables": "The Rockefeller Commission claimed that Olson jumped out of the hotel window in the midst of an LSD-induced psychosis, but Olson's son Eric thinks he was murdered because he was appalled by the human experimentation that was going on and prepared to blow the whistle on it" (Jones 485). Kevin Dowlings and Philip Knightley reported in 1998 that "the long-term aim of these experiments with mind-altering drugs is thought by those who have studied the MK-Ultra programme to have been to ensure the dominance of Anglo-American civilization in what eugenicists call the 'war of all against all -- the key to evolutionary success'" (13).
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.