The USA Politics And Globalwarming Debate

Climate Geopolitics The international political solutions to climate change may not be very feasible and practical in their implementation since the issue of climate has now been turned into a political wand to sway voters one way or the other. This then means the solutions suggested are personal beliefs or party beliefs towards handling the climate change. The challenge then comes when the individual or the party ceases to be in power and a rival comes into power, one who does not prioritize climate issues, then it means that earlier efforts will be neglected and reversed. The private and the NGOs are more likely to inform the climate change agenda since they often have the vision that guides them regardless of who is at the helm of the organization.

The few high polluters need to be presented with the historical data of the cost of climate change and the devastation it has visited on the globe. With the tangible practical data it will be clearer to the polluting industries that the resources that they badly depend on are at the brink of extinction if they do not increase the stamping out of greenhouse gasses.

3. The issue of climate change is central in the current political debate and both the democrats and the republicans believe that manufacturing their own. In as much as it is not fair to limit the development of the developing countries, there is need to embrace reality of the global warming and even consider engagements that lead to foreign manufacturing of different goods products then repatriating them back to the mother countries where the raw…

Cite this Document:

"The USA Politics And Globalwarming Debate" (2016, April 06) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/the-usa-politics-and-globalwarming-debate-2159543

"The USA Politics And Globalwarming Debate" 06 April 2016. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/the-usa-politics-and-globalwarming-debate-2159543>

"The USA Politics And Globalwarming Debate", 06 April 2016, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/the-usa-politics-and-globalwarming-debate-2159543

Related Documents

Politics International Trade-Offs In international policy, as in the course of daily human life, self-interested actors must carefully weigh competing and often equally valid choices, and make for themselves some compromise between opposed values. It seems that as often as one is able to solve a problem, one notices that the very solution causes problems of its own. An unmitigated good is difficult to find even in one person's individual life, and

In contrast, if countries began immediately to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the cost could be limited to approximately one percent of global GDP each year. Global warming is a scientific issue, but it is being treating as an economic and political one. The Kyoto Protocol should never have allowed economic considerations to justify exemptions. This only gives incentives for companies to move to countries with exemptions to take advantage of

Even [make personal] for those of us living in developed nations, the impacts of acting against global warming are very detrimental i. [higher pitch, yet calm; almost condescending] small manufacturing firms that are just starting out will not be able to afford the technologies and processes that meet new emissions standards or purchase the credits for excess emissions that are popular parts of most global warming plans 1. This is unfair

Global Warming Affects
PAGES 5 WORDS 1409

Global Warming Formal Outline what is climate change and what is it doing? The reality of global warming: fact vs. fiction and the marginalized greed-based business perspective The Economics of global warming vs. The moral impact of global warming on all stakeholders including non-human ones. Climate change, not global warming: the effects are different in different parts of the globe. The political, social, and financial challenges that global warming creates and how the challenges can be

According to the U.S.A. Today (Borenstein, 2007), the latest IPCC report states that within twenty years "hundreds of millions of people won't have enough water." And while safe drinking water may not be available to those millions of people, tens of millions of others will be "flooded out of their homes each year" as rising temperatures cause polar ice caps to melt. "Tropical diseases like malaria will spread" and in

These effects would be unfairly harsh on developing nations, who had little to do with creating the problem; this is one of the reasons that recent international talks in Copenhagen have stalled (WGW 2009). Not only would these countries not be able to develop as quickly and have healthier populations and more stable governments, but industrialized nations would also see negative economic impacts, making many wary of making any