Research Paper Undergraduate 2,629 words

Theory of Group Development

Last reviewed: March 31, 2013 ~14 min read
Abstract

In psychology, the ability of an individual to control a group successfully is not an easy task. This has led to the development of appropriate theories dealing with group dynamics and how anyone can handle the appropriately. This study focuses on Cognitive Behavior Therapy and the way a counselor can incorporate it in handling a group. The qualities expected of the leader in accordance with this theory are also elucidated.

¶ … Group Develoment

Theory of Group Development

Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Cognitive Behavior Therapy is one of the group development theories or models that are used in today's societies and institutions. The validity of making and developing groups is geared towards equitable management of the available group and behavior of people within an institution or place of work. According to Cognitive Behavior Therapy, group development is a lucrative endeavor that has to be worked on in every institution. Group behavior development refers to the concept of relaying equitable avenues of growth and development within a unified sector of human and material togetherness. There is no doubt that all human beings exist in a form or the form of groups in society. The existence and services of these groups is detrimental to the general performance and productivity of the people.

Group working and development surpasses individual performances in many regards. This is the reason why the Cognitive Behavior Therapy advocated for equitable management and development of employee behavior within workstations and in every human endeavor. There are different approaches through which human beings are categorical of resting in unity with the existent parameters of control (Arrow et al., 2000). The control measures in every institution are to blame for the success or failure of the structures of performance. Many attributes are developed when people and institutions exist in the form of groups and work together for a common good. The society is a basic quality that means everything to the structures of development. The people are the society. They are existent within a specified avenue of growth and development. In order to master the artificialities of growth and development, it becomes relevant and possible to exercise equitable avenues of growth and development.

The model or theory of group development was developed in an endeavor to understand how human behaviors can be managed and controlled within a group. According to the Cognitive Behavior Therapy, group development is one of the lucrative undertakings that can be used to measure the state of corporate performance within a number of workers within an institution. Cognitive Behavior Therapy measures group development and calls it a dynamism endeavor that is linked towards the creation of a "group dynamic" in the human society. There is no way that a group can be termed as a dynamic body. There are different approaches of management that can be realized within a state of group development and management. At least every group has its unified and categorical features that make set of them to be unique in its performance and existence (Conyne, 2010). The Cognitive Behavior Therapy takes several categories or considerations into concern in the development of a group in the society. The concept of behavior development and relation is lucrative and large in any human setting. In order to foster equitable management of resources and materials of management, a group has the innate dynamism that proposes every move for success and corporation.

Discussion of theorist(s), theoretical concepts,

Individual change is a facet that has attracted the innate parameters of development within Kurt Lewin's Individual Change Process model of group development. Every person within a group is unique and beneficial to the states of growth and development. Several avenues of performances are directed to the concepts of growth and development ion the society. In order to monitor the avenues of performances within a group, this theory proposes the advantage of the individual contributions in the society. The theory has reiterated on the significance of the individual employees or corporate members within a group. The benefits and performances of every group are directed to the overall performances that are to be realized by the group at the end of the matter in the society. The mechanisms of performances are lucrative when the individual persons are given equitable grounds of existence. This is a platform from where they will be able to exercise equitable change and management of the parameters of performance within a group. Therefore, the Cognitive Behavior Therapy focuses on the benefits of having an influence of the individual members of the group (In Bradford, 1978).

The individual members are advocates to every parameter of behavioral change and attribution in the society. There are every possible ways and means of meeting the required avenues of performance when the members and active in the process. According to Kurt Lewin's Individual Change Process, individualism is as good as the entire group within the stages of growth and development. There is every scale of performances when the individual members are involved in all sectors of growth and development. The individual members are to blame for any success or failure that is registered by a group at any given time. The attributes of change and development within a group are directed to the individual and systematic contributions from the members concerned in the society. These avenues of performances are directed at relaying the best approaches of growth and development. Nonetheless, the attributes are manageable within a single body when the managing group is attached to the individual members therein.

The Cognitive Behavior Therapy has focused on one facet of change within an organization or a group for that matter. The influences and creativeness of the individual processes are gained within the scale of change attribution in a group. A person ought to be dynamic and flexible at all times. The states of dynamism and flexibility of realized when the immediate members are given the innate responsibilities of meeting the exact measures of performances within a group. Many attributes can be realized from a group of people or groups with people who are endeavored to bring positive changes within the scales of management and production. Every stage of growth and development is attributed to the concepts of change and change management in a group. There is a possibility that the possible attributes of management and human engagement are directed at bringing the best attributes of performances within a group. There are certain situations where the members of change and group management are to embrace new facets of performance. This is an easy way of creating a direction within group management in the society.

According to the Cognitive Behavior Therapy, change is one of the corporate and individual responsibilities within a society or group of people. Change is a necessary facet of management that surpasses every other technique of management in the organization or society. The attributes of change are redirected at relaying the best avenues of growth and development within a group. In order to master every possibility of management in the society, there are specified avenues of management that are to be exemplified (Yalom & Leszcz, 2008). For instance, change needs to be a regular entity that restores the common pathways of growth and development. No other possible avenue of performance can be regarded without influencing or making use of the parameters of change and management in a group. When such attributes are made available and valid within a society of organization, the products of the attributes are a strong group that is ready to overcome every challenge within the scales of management.

Cognitive Behavior Therapy has a strong focus on the personalized attributes of change and management within a group in the society. The existing traditions of change and management are directed at establishing the possible ways of uniting the partisan members while bringing directed avenues of performances within a society. Some of the attributes have been developed as pillars in the Cognitive Behavior Therapy. The theory has much respect to the effects brought by the individual members and change parameters in trying to bring about change and management within a group. Development of groups is an idea that has been in the world for many sectors and decades. According to the Cognitive Behavior Therapy, the disregard of individual changes in many organizations has contributed to poor governance and development of groups in society. The mechanisms of change and management are directed at influencing positivity and positive results from the members involved. In order to foster a manageable avenue in the society, there is much need to have individual contributions from the concerned members in the group. This outstanding achievement can be directed in the growth and development in the society (Stremba & Bisson, 2009).

According to the existing avenues of change and management, there is a need to have a solicited performance that reflects the nature of the group before embracing the consequences of change in that group. In most case, it has become relevant to solidify avenues of change and management in the society. The most testimonial categories of management and performances is directed at exercising true change and respect for all the members forming the group at that instance of group creation and development. Change is a necessary facet as reiterated by the Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Organizations are supposed to embrace every attribute or change in the society. Change is a directive that is influenced within the positive perceptions of the group. Therefore, Cognitive Behavior Therapy has a greater influence in perceiving and developing the possible attributes of change within every scale of performance in a group (Forsyth, 2010).

Techniques and application to specific populations

According to the Cognitive Behavior Therapy of group development, change management within a group is thought to take several steps in the society. These changes are a reflection of the encampment members and connotations of management within that group. These stages of change management in group development include unfreezing, change, and freezing.

Unfreezing

This is one of the developmental stages of growth and development that issued by the author in exemplifying his Cognitive Behavior Therapy in the organization. According to the theory, this conditional aspect of group development involves overcoming of the inertia together with dismantling the existing set of the minds. The members involved with group management and change are expected to have taken sides directed at influencing positivity and growth within an organization. The states of manipulation and management of the approachable skills of change and development are within the concept of change among the members and pillars of the group.

A group cannot be established if the pillars are resistant to the innate calls for change. Change and management do not come easy without requisite adjustments among the members involved. Therefore, this avenue of management and growth is directed at managing every possible change within the mindsets of the members of the group. According to the Cognitive Behavior Therapy, unfreezing plays the innate and first role of management within an organization (Lacoursiere, 1980). There is no possible way of refraining from the possibilities of change if the necessary measures of future stability are not made as required as possible. Within this avenue of group, development is the evolution of defense mechanisms or characters among the members concerned. There is every possibility that the attributes of change and management are directed at influencing possible change among the members concerned. The immediate changes among the members are an attribute that influences other positive stages of measurement in the society. In such a case, the involved members are categorical of relaying all scales of management and growth in the society (Agazarian, 2004).

Change

This is an overall aspect that determines the attributes of group management within an organization. This aspect of change involves a staged confusion and transition. The rudimentary existence of an organization and all of its attributes are directed at influencing a transition to a better stage of creativity and productivity within an organization. In order to be of any innate importance, this aspect or stage of management and growth is based on personalized resistance to the new mechanisms of performance within a group. In order to be of any importance, the individual members are subjected to the fact that they are sure of the changes that are coming. Nonetheless, they exercise equitable attributes of change and management within that existence (Corey, 2012).

You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
13 sources cited in this paper
  • Agazarian, Y. (2004). Cognitive Behavior Therapy. London: Karnac.
  • Agazarian, Y., & Peters, R. (1995). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Two perspectives on group psychotherapy and group process. London: Karnac Books.
  • Arrow, H., Berdahl, J. L., & McGrath, J. E. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Conyne, R. K. (2010). The Oxford handbook of group counseling. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Corey, G. (2012). Theory & practice of group counseling. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
  • Corey, M. S., Corey, G., Corey, C., & Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. (2010). Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Forsyth, D. R. (2010). Group dynamics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Frey, L. R., Gouran, D. S., & Poole, M. S. (1999). The handbook of group communication theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • In Bradford, L. P. (1978). Group development. La Jolla, CA: University Associates.
  • Lacoursiere, R. B. (1980). The life cycle of groups: Group developmental stage theory. New York: Human Sciences Press.
  • Levi, D. (2011). Group dynamics for teams. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Stremba, B., & Bisson, C. A. (2009). Teaching adventure education theory: Best practices. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Theory of Group Development. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/theory-of-group-development-87137

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.