Grounded Theory and Phenomenology Phenomenology and Grounded

¶ … Grounded theory and phenomenology

Phenomenology and Grounded theory are the most widely recognized methodologies to qualitative research utilized by medical practitioners. Despite the fact that there are distinctions between the two, they have share much in common.

Both assume an interpretivist strategy in which the researcher tries to investigate genuine scenarios, and require a high level of face-to-face interaction between the researcher and the group or individual being analyzed. This is manifested in form of observations or interviews. Phenomenology and Grounded theory aim to gather and investigate information from participants' viewpoints and attempt to guarantee their feelings are not affected by preconceived ideas. For them to realize this, they include participants in data analysis to expand the validity of the findings frequently. In short, Phenomenology and Grounded theory both look to investigate people's encounters in the setting of the world in which they live (Cassell & Symon, 2009).

Since both methodologies have much in common, it is challenging to draw a distinction between the two. The difference may not be imperative for those pursuing qualitative research but those seeking the endeavor. First, it is advisable to pursue the differences by looking at the philosophical and hypothetical bases of the two methods and their impact on how research is embraced (Tesch, 2010).

Phenomenology stems from philosophy, principally shaped by Martin Heidegger and Edmund Husserl. It seeks to explore and describe experiences that can just be carried out by gathering information from people who have survived those encounters. Subsequently phenomenologists regularly allude to the "existing experience" and information is frequently restricted to interviews. Similarly, results are reported as a rich description of the experience drawing on aspects established through data analysis (Boswell & Cannon, 2014).

Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss initially portrayed grounded theory advanced in human science as a qualitative methodological approach. The goal was to create a "grounded hypothesis" to explain and describe the phenomenon under study. Unlike phenomenologists, grounded theorists try to incorporate all information sources that may boost theory development. Interviews are utilized although they may incorporate research, past literature, images, diaries, and observations. Utilizing a method defined as 'constant comparison', they contrast all the information gathered and all other information search for conflicting cases, which may challenge the rising theory will eventually fortify it. This complex methodology of data collection, theoretical sampling, and analysis could be challenging (Cassell & Symon, 2009).

Two quantitative nursing research studies related to my clinical area of interest

Non-experimental research is not based on random assignments, control of variables, or comparison groups. The researcher is only required to observe what happens naturally without mediating in any manner. There are numerous explanations behind undertaking Non-experimental research. First, various attributes, or variables are most certainly not subject or agreeable to exploratory control or randomization. Further, a few variables cannot or may as well not be manipulated for moral purposes. In some occasions, autonomous variables have as of recently they cannot be manipulated.