Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Good leadership is an essential component in a military organization because of the complex nature of military operations. Such leadership is provided by good leaders with capability to adapt to rapidly changing situations in the operational environment. Some of the components that characterize good leadership in military operations and organizations include making quality decisions, creating a positive environment for all subordinates, analytical problem solving, and systems integration. In this regard, some of the core qualities military leaders should possess include intellect, presence, character, and ability. Even though the significance of good military leaders to successful operations is recognized in this field, there are toxic leaders who have negative impacts on military organizations.Toxic leaders exist in military ranks and have negative impacts on the achievement of effective mission command. Reed & Olsen (2010) define toxic leaders as leaders who do not care for well-being of their subordinates and have personal or interpersonal techniques with negative impacts on organizational climate. Toxic leadership in military operations and organizations is characterized by subordinates’ belief and conviction that the leader is motivated primarily by self-interest. Toxic leaders in the ranks of the military utilize destructive leadership styles and techniques that generate a...
Toxic leaders affect the human dimension of leadership by being narcissistic. Doty & Fenlason (2013) contend that toxic leaders are selfish and self-serving individuals who destroy the motivation of subordinates and military units. This implies that toxic leaders affect the human dimension of leadership by focusing on their self interests at the expense of the motivation and well-being of their subordinates. Narcissism is considered as a critical and huge part of toxic leadership in the military since toxic leaders tend to have an exaggerated sense of self-importance and excessive preoccupation with themselves and their interests (Doty & Fenlason, 2013). During this process, toxic leaders show an apparent lack of concern for the motivation, interests, and well-being of their subordinates and units. Consequently, they end up affecting the human element of leadership since their personal success and satisfaction matters most in comparison to the overall success and effectiveness of the organization.
Since these leaders have considerable impacts on the effectiveness of military units, operations, and organizations,…
The subjects were 613 injured Army personnel Military Deployment Services TF Report 13 admitted to Walter Reed Army Medical Center from March 2003 to September 2004 who were capable of completing the screening battery. Soldiers were assessed at approximately one month after injury and were reassessed at four and seven months either by telephone interview or upon return to the hospital for outpatient treatment. Two hundred and forty-three soldiers
An effective military unit is built on the firm foundation of quality leadership; leadership drives performance outcomes and creates the organizational climate and culture necessary for success. While multiple leadership styles can prove effective under various circumstances, toxic leadership almost always has an adverse impact on morale within the unit (Sadulski, 2018). Toxic leadership undermines trust, creates a climate of fear, and can even “violate the legitimate interests of the
Leadership Styles of Sam Damon and Courtney Massengale In the military setting, it is very common to hear statements like 'you are acting like a Courtney (Sam) on that issue'. Courtney Massengale and Sam Damon are the two main characters in the novel, Once an Eagle by Anton Myrer. The two are portrayed as significantly different army officers in a story that revolves around the key themes of unchecked ambition,
Essay � Crucible ExperienceThe word �crucible� refers to a trial or an ordeal-by-fire for the individual or organization involved. It is an experience which is life-changing and forever alters the perspective of the people who must endure it. Over the course of my military service, like all soldiers, I have had several watershed or crucible events which have defined me as a person. Although crucible experiences may test our mettle,
Introduction Military is an extension of culture, politics and history. As Eric Ouellet (n.d.) points out, understanding a nation’s military requires that one focus “on the organized violence of armed groups; whether this violence is actual, potential, or symbolic” (p. 30). When it comes to the U.S. and Iran, no two countries could be more different. The U.S. is a liberal, Western democracy with the world’s biggest all-volunteer military. Iran is
U.S. MILITARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Military & Environmental Law Environmental Analysis and Impact of the United States Military Military activity affects the environment in direct and indirect ways. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of military training and readiness activities and the impact of armed conflict and war on the environment. Most environmental impact that results from armed conflict and war occurs in foreign and not domestic environments. However,