Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
True Grit (Newest Version)
Joel and Ethan Coen's 1969 motion picture True Grit puts across an account involving 14-year-old Mattie Ross as she hires a worn-down U.S. Marshall to track down her father's murderer, Tom Chaney. This film is intriguing because it revives archetypal Western traits in a time when society has almost forgotten that the genre exists. In spite of his overweight and is wearing an eye patch does not stop him from being an excellent shooter and Marshall, this series of features bringing a sort of general silliness into the film. It is very probable that the filmmaker wanted to involve parody in the motion picture through presenting Bridges' change from a drunkard to an iconic gunslinger as being something that is not out of the ordinary. One of the most significant factors in the film relates to how Bridges' character expresses less of a macho attitude and makes it possible for...
Cogburn. His wacky attitude is essential in shaping the overall nature of the film and in adding authenticity. Even though she is meant to play the role of an annoying girl, Hailee Steinfield appears to exaggerate at times and manages to exasperate audiences in addition to irritating the characters that she interacts with. All things considered, she successfully plays her role and proves that her age does not stop her from putting across clever acting. Other characters manage to put across feelings characteristic to the old West, as they focus on values treasured there during the time period that the film deals with.
The film's…
Costumes are typical for the West, as the director used cowboy stereotypes in dressing most of the characters. Even though she is a girl, Mattie is dressed as a boy with the purpose of emphasizing her tomboy mind-set. Rooster's clothes and his overall appearance demonstrate that he is not necessarily influenced by the choices that he makes in life. In spite of the fact that he seems to be indifferent to how he looks, he constantly manages to pose in an individual who has little trouble caring for his outer shell, given that he constantly appears to be clean.
The Coen brothers are successful in presenting audiences with a film that is relatively different from typical Westerns as a consequence of the fact that it involves more wit. Amusing scenes in the motion picture are not just meant to entertain people, as they contribute to conveying a message that relates to intellect present in individuals who initially seem incapable to perform some of the easiest tasks. Bridges perfectly plays his role and actually makes it possible for viewers to see how he is able to employ diversity in his acting.
Dir. Ethan Coen and Dir. Joel Coen. True Grit. Paramout Pictures, 2010.
O Brother, Where Art Thou? Homer in Hollywood: The Coen Brothers' O Brother, Where Art Thou? Could a Hollywood filmmaker adapt Homer's Odyssey for the screen in the same way that James Joyce did for the Modernist novel? The idea of a high-art film adaptation of the Odyssey is actually at the center of the plot of Jean-Luc Godard's 1963 film Contempt, and the Alberto Moravia novel on which Godard's film is
Miller's Crossing gives the best example of the "ethics" of the crime film genre -- beginning as it does with the classic speech delivered by Giovanni Gasparo: "I'm talkin' about friendship -- I'm talkin' about character -- I'm talkin' about -- hell, Leo, I ain't embarrassed to use the word: I'm talkin' about ethics…" The film, of course, is full of characters whose actions are shady and unethical -- but
1960s and 1970s Counterculture Movement In the United States of America, freedom of speech and the ability to challenge accepted truths and to criticize the status quo have been a part of the identity of citizens since the Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776. Since then, the country has undergone many changes, particularly in the ways that the social norm views the nation and the population who inhabit
movie industry in America has been controlled by some of the monolithic companies which not only provided a place for making the movies, but also made the movies themselves and then distributed it throughout the entire country. These are movie companies and their entire image revolved around the number of participants of their films. People who wanted to see the movies being made had to go to the "studios"
He simply cannot escape these expectations. So, when Robert DeNiro takes on a comedic role, such as the role of the potential father-in-law in Meet the Parents, the moment he comes on the screen, the audience is aware that he is Robert DeNiro, in addition to the character that is being portrayed. Therefore, his character can do things that other characters could not. Who but Robert DeNiro could portray
Already educated, she had the resources to -- and indeed did find - employment opportunities. Sociologically, she belonged in the lower middle classes. Both individuals had intelligence, courage and grits. But both also possessed existent privileges with which they could pull themselves up. Critics of the work-it-hard perspective omit these facts. Perhaps they do so because focusing on the ordeals of the working class would suck us in a