Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
U.S.A and Turkey Diplomatic Relations
Events between the U.S. And Turkey since the End of Cold War
Gary E. Oldenburg has it that the cold war ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991. Various things have happened between Turkey and the U.S. since the end of this war bearing in mind that the first contests of the cold war were in Turkey, Greece and Iran.
Ceren Mutus (2011) notes that the eruption of the gulf war after the cold war served to strengthen the relations between Turkey and the U.S. unlike what people anticipated. More so the Clinton administration's support for the Turkish IMF debt guarantees was another event after the cold war between the U.S. And Turkey as registered by Turkish weekly (25th August 2011)
US's support for Turkeys EU membership is also another event between Turkey and the U.S.U.S. has been strongly advocating for Turkish membership in the EU. In addition to this there has been another event according to Ceren Mutus (2011), the capture of PKK leader Ocalan in cooperation with the U.S. is also an event that is worth noting since the end of cold war.
The eruption of Iraq war in 2003 is an event that is deemed to have contributed largely to fading strong relationships between Turkey and America and the resultant strains between the two countries. This is widely viewed so due to Turkey's opposing the establishment of an independent Kurdish state in northern Iraq it was an opposition to the U.S. interference and interest as well as stand in the region as the U.S.A. was for the formation of the independent state.
The tension was further heightened by the rejection of the request to use Turkish territory as a transition ground for the U.S.A. soldiers entering Iraq. This was informed by the fact that Turkish parliament never saw Saddam Hussein...
& Brian K. 2008).
In 1997, Cooperation between the two countries was formulated in five topics that included; energy, economy, trade, regional cooperation, Cyprus and the defense and security cooperation according to Turkey MFA (2011). This was an act of showing that the U.S. had realized it still needed Turkey despite the end of the cold war. The two nations willingly agreed to support one another in the specified issues so as to enhance the development of the two nations. In 1999 they took it a step further by officially declaring themselves as strategic partners which meant that they were now multi-dimensional cooperation in a wide range of topics and regions, Thomas Friedman (2011).
The Current Relationship between USA and Turkey
The current relationship between Turkey and U.S. is not strong. Actually the Turkish Weekly Journal (25 August 2011) terms it as a fading one. The journal goes ahead to say that Turkey has since gone to the extent of distancing itself from the west and has gotten alternative partnerships like with Russia and Syria. However Ceren Mutus (2011) says that despite the current kind of relationship that exists between Turkey and the U.S., Turkey remains an indispensable partner which calls for concrete suggestion to revitalize the relationship.
The Current USA Diplomatic Approach to Iran
Bruce Crumley (2008) has it that U.S. have resolved to use a diplomatic policy towards Iran as a result of the long time defiant nature of Iran to comply with UN demands. He records that in 2008 the presidential candidates vowed to deploy a diplomatic policy towards Iran in bid to try and make Iran stop making atomic…
References
Bruce C. & Tony K., (2008). Changing the Conventional Wisdom about Iran. Retrieved August
25, 2011 from http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1847342,00.html
Ceren Mutus, (2011). Winning Turkey: How America, Europe, and Turkey Can Revive a Fading
Partnership. Retrieved August 25, 2011 from http://www.turkishweekly.net/book/51/winning-turkey-how-america-europe-and-turkey-can-revive-a-fading-partnership.html
25, 2011 from http://www.oldenburger.us/gary/docs/TheColdWar.htm
Kaveh L.A., (2007). U.S. Diplomacy with Iran Is Working. Retrieved August 25, 2011 from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IH11Ak02.html
Spencer P.B. & Brian K. (2008). The Neglected Alliance Restoring U.S. -- Turkish Relations to Meet 21st Century Challenges. Retrieved August 25, 2011 from http://www.turkey-now.org/db/Docs/CAP_turkey.pdf
2011 from http://paper-hut.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-united-states-need-turkey-as-ally.html
COLD WAR AND U.S. DIPLOMACY Current Events and U.S. Diplomacy has focused on maintaining close relations with some of the countries that it has had an interdependent connection with during the recent decades. Even with this, changes resulting from globalization and other factors have influenced the superpower to revise its strategies concerning diplomatic policies. Its relationship with Russia is probably one of the most intriguing relations ever seen, considering that even though
Cold War Truman 1945-1953 and expansion of communism As the 21 century approaches, there was every indication on the firmness of Present Harry S. Truman's reputation on the subject of his stewardship of foreign policy even though, as luck would have it, he took over Oval Office in the year 1945 inexperienced in affairs of the world. As he was approaching the end of his reign in the White House, there were
Egypt hopes to gain economic and political momentum for itself and the region through ongoing partnership with the EU and Mediterranean cooperation within the Barcelona Process. The Association Agreement between the EU and Egypt is expected to enter into force soon. It has already been ratified by the majority of the EU member states (also including Germany) and the section on trade relations has already come into provisional effect, and
Many did not agree with this action because Senators Fulbright and Russell believed it would lead to an air strike on West Berlin or a blockade of that city. They knew it would lead to war. Kennedy had few choices but instead did not back down and lead the country through the crisis. He never "lost sight of the fact that once military action started, there was no telling
S. have two different approaches. While the EU represents the "soft power" the United States is the proponent of the "hard power" (Kagan, 2003). However, it is considered that the issue of soft power is representative for the way in which states would later on develop their foreign policy and their strategic coordinates. However, in the case of Iraq and Iran it can be said that the current hard power
' Indians across the political spectrum, especially the country's powerful nuclear weapons establishment, are critical of the NPT, arguing that it unfairly warps international hierarchies to the disadvantage of the non-nuclear-weapon states" (1998:15). In its efforts to balance the pressures from the international community with its own self-interests in formulating foreign policies, the position adopted by India has been starkly different than other countries. In this regard, Karp concludes that,