Moreover, on page 2 Dan continues with the litany: Kosovo had an "inadequate banking and financial sector" featuring "poor legal framework conditions for lending, no equity market, [and] an uncertain framework for foreign investment." In Kosovo at the time of the USAID $20 million investment there were "…inadequate and expensive utilities, inadequate and costly transport for exports, a delayed privatization program" and moreover the courts were said to be "ineffective" with generally "uncertain" legal dynamics.
A nation will gain competitive advantage in certain industries where the demand at home gives companies and projects "a clearer or earlier picture of emerging buyer needs" through innovation, Porter explained on page 79. And on page 80 of Porter's 1990 scholarly essay the noted business expert states that if the "…nation's values are spreading" beyond its borders then companies within that nation can expect success.
But wait. In Kosovo at the time of the mid-term evaluation -- in the Executive Summary of the report -- there was no chance that values could be expanding. Indeed, the Kosovo government was "…characterized by indecisiveness and a lack of ability to implement private sector policy in an effective and consistent manner" (Dan, p. 2).
The USAID mission statement asserts that the agency's role is to go into a country that is in transition and "identify the barriers that keep businesses from flourishing"; and yet in Kosovo at the time the $20 million project was put together Kosovo was operating under a division of political responsibilities -- with both the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) and the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government (PISG). Looking at Porter's diamond in the context of the political and economic chaos in Kosovo, the professor's fourth component ("Firm Strategy, Structure, and Rivalry") there was not much of a chance for Kosovo's government to help companies be launched or be innovative.
"When a national environment permits and supports the most rapid accumulation of specialized assets and skills…companies gain a competitive advantage," Porter explains (p. 77). The national environment in this case was certainly not in any position to support the assets and skills of workers (especially with 70% of the workforce not employed). By juxtaposing Porter's point made in the first...
6) and an objective researcher can see the crux of the problem: "Two out of three overall indicators measuring business association progress are behind target," Dan explains. These factors include "…external constraints, over which the Project has less control, such as the lack of Government initiative taken in public-private dialog activities," Dan continues on page 6.
The final relevant points to be made regarding this project -- in contrast to what Porter offers in his theories -- is that the reason the project isn't going so well, beside the fact that it appears USAID bit off more than it could chew, is that there were "…overly optimistic assumptions made during the initial project design regarding…progress toward sustainability" (Dan, 2006, p. 6).
Moreover, the cluster approach is not working well in Kosovo, and Dan (p. 7) admits that: a) this is not intended as a "classic cluster competitiveness project in the full sense of the Michael Porter approach"; b) the Porter approach generally relies on "actively bringing together all the stakeholders" and this was not done in Kosovo; and c) the Kosovo project is more of an extension of a previous project rather than a "Cluster Competitiveness project."
Works Cited
Dan, Michael B., and Wellons, Richard Lindsey. (2006). Mid-Term Evaluation of the Kosovo
Cluster and Business Support Project. Retrieved Oct. 22, 2010, from http://usaid.gov, 1-52.
Dunning, John H. (1993). Internationalizing Porter's Diamond. Management International
Review. Vol. 33, 7-15.
Narula, Rajneesh. (1993). Technology, International Business and Porter's "Diamond":
Synthesizing a Dynamic Competitive Development Model. Management International
Review, Vol. 33, 85-107.
Porter, Michael E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review,
73-93.
USAID. (2009). Education & Universities / Economic Growth & Trade / About Us. Retrieved
Oct. 21, 2010, from http://www.usaid.gov.
U.S. National Archives & Records Administration. (2010). The Marshall Plan. Retrieved Oct.
21, 2010, from http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/marshall_plan/index.html.
Even if it, the tyranny of the majority would challenge the idea that sovereignty should be the utmost principle by which the world's people guide itself. Conclusion The United Nations has developed the R2P concept on the basis of its philosophical vision for the world. The organic development of sovereignty in couched in the ideal of control over territories by the people who live there. When the latter condition does not
Humanitarian Intervention in Somalia (1990) What is genocide? When it comes to genocide there is a lot of disagreement amongst legal scholars as to what is enough to qualify as genocide. But basically genocide is described as the logical, structured, planned attack or in other words the deliberate destruction of a national, religious, racial or ethnic group. The said destruction could be in whole or in part. Scholars of the legal system
2007 http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=110113576. Using NATO and Other Alliances to Counter International Terrorism The increased use of terrorism to attack foreign nations has increased during the last decade at an alarming rate and on an even more alarming scale of destruction. Following the September 11, 2001, attack on the United States by organized terrorists, and because the United States' response to that attack has since itself come under world scrutiny and criticism, the
Humanitarian intervention is morally and legally justified in response to internal atrocities, even at the expense of national sovereignty. The ongoing violence in Syria has raised the specter of intervention by external forces in order to address the growing humanitarian crisis. Yet to this point, no foreign government or body has been willing to intervene. The legitimacy of humanitarian intervention at the expense of national sovereignty has been an issue for
Humanitarian Intervention The neoliberal conception of the world that emerged after World War Two incorporated an expanded role for international agencies, led by the United Nations, and an expanded sense of common responsibility among nations. Humanitarian intervention is one of the ways in which this common responsibility has manifested. The process of decolonialization in particular has brought about new conceptions of sovereignty and the nation-state. The UN emphasized one of the
Iraq War: Humanitarian Intervention? No news item garners more interest and more debate today in America and around the world than the impending second war against Iraq. President George Bush led a coalition in a war against Iraq over a decade ago after Iraq's leader, Saddam Hussein, attacked and overran the small princely state of Kuwait. Coalition forces "drew a line in the sand" and forced Saddam Hussein's forces out of