The Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The United States Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
944
Cite

Article One In the article “Taking DNA from All Criminals Should Be Standard Procedure” written by Cyrus R. Vance Jr, 2012, the author makes a claim that DNA evidence is a powerful crime solver. He also states that this method is a superb technique which can avert rapes, robberies and murders in the hundreds annually at a very low cost to citizens. DNA evidence does not just help catch criminals; it also helps absolve the guiltless ones. A major aim I have had in my position of district attorney is to ensure no one gets convicted wrongly. A tool like this all-crimes DNA archive will strongly aid us in achieving our most important goal which is avoiding erroneous convictions (Vance, 2012).

DNA collection is properly regulated and organized at the eight world-class and government-backed state laboratories where criminal forensic analysis is carried out. Strict rules guide the process of DNA testing and results delivery, with an example being the storing of information as barcode and not in name and whoever violates this will face criminal penalties. During testing, if a match is found within the databank, the samples are tested again most times, two additional times. Gathering the DNA of everyone convicted of crimes has been widely supported by all parties within the state, i.e. victims of crime, their lawyers,...

...

However, its adoption in the House has been hindered due to some criminal justice laws which are not as widely backed added to it. Let’s try not to make the same error this year (Vance, 2012).
Article Two

Adam Liptak, 2013, brings to light the verdict of the Supreme Court of the United States which allowed DNA samples to be collected by the police from persons held for possible involvement in serious offences. 28 states as well as the federal government itself allow this and the law enforcement agencies see this as an important tool in investigating unresolved crimes. Nevertheless, he noted that; searching a person without a substantial level of suspicion for the purpose of collecting evidence regarding an unconnected crime is forbidden under the Fourth Amendment, a statement the public didn’t counter. “Make no mistake about it: because of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason,” Justice Scalia stated (Liptak, 2013).

In the same vein, The Maryland Court of Appeals reached a conclusion that a law allowing the collection of…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Liptak, A. (2013, June 03). Justices Allow DNA Collection After an Arrest. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/04/us/supreme-court-says-police-can-take-dna-samples.html?mcubz=1

Shelton, D. E. (2008, March 28). The CSI Effect: Does It Really Exist? Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://www.nij.gov/journals/259/pages/csi-effect.aspx

Vance, C. R., Jr. (2012, January 23). Taking DNA From All Criminals Should Be Standard Procedure. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/opinion/collect-dna-samples-even-when-its-just-a-misdemeanor.html?mcubz=1&module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Opinion&action=keypress®ion=FixedLeft&pgtype=article



Cite this Document:

"The Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The United States" (2017, August 31) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/verdict-of-supreme-court-united-states-2165911

"The Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The United States" 31 August 2017. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/verdict-of-supreme-court-united-states-2165911>

"The Verdict Of The Supreme Court Of The United States", 31 August 2017, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/verdict-of-supreme-court-united-states-2165911

Related Documents

U.S.C. § 48 is not aimed at specific instances of animal cruelty, but specifically at the creation and distribution of depictions of such abuse for the purposes of interstate and/or foreign commerce. This is the act that the appellant was unarguably engaging in when apprehended by law enforcement, and the fact that the law is not aimed at those participating directly in acts of animal cruelty does not in

Catholic Church in Spain and the United States The Catholic Church has been a very significant religious and political institution in the Europe. Its origins can be traced to a thousand years when Christianity was itself in its infancy. It was a symbol of colossal authority and was much regarded as an institution that was as similar to the installed governmental mechanism of any nation state. Its power and influence spread

Supreme Court Case Study
PAGES 3 WORDS 949

Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court Case Study Every year Supreme Court provides decision in cases that really impact the American citizen's rights. The aim of this analysis is to keenly check cases handled by the Supreme Court and the way they were given their final verdict. The parties involved sometimes get that the cases favor them or not depending on the existing laws or even through undermining the constitution. The case in

counter-majoritarian difficulty is what some refer to as the most well-known issue in constitutional theory. A phrase created by Alexander Bickel, the Yale Professor introduced it in his book titled The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Although it is not certain what Bickel meant by making that phrase, it grew to have a life of its own. Essentially now it means when unelected

Wetlands Regulation in USA
PAGES 30 WORDS 8001

Stress: Regulation of Wetlands in the United States Regulation of Wetlands in the United States Defining Wetlands and their Value A wetland refers to a place where water covers the soil. A wetland is a saturated land that comprises of swamps or marshes. Lewis defines a wetland as, "an ecosystem that depends on constant or recurrent, shallow inundation or saturation at or near the surface of the substrate" (p.3). He further ascertains that

However, this difficulty can be avoided by examining van den Haag's distinction between justice and equality. The physical reality of administering justice can never match its theoretical guidelines. Justice is a necessary tool in the aim of producing a functional society. Accordingly, inequities that arise in its practice must be tolerated -- although fought against. State sanctioned killing, on the other hand, is not a logistic necessity for any