This paper evaluates the methodological approach used in two papers titled "Terrorism and the Shape of Things to Come. Terrorism and Political Violence" and "Forecasting Terrorism: Indicators and Proven Analytic Techniques". Each of the research paper uses different methodological approach. The benefit of using qualitative method is that the author has been able to arrive at a precise solution to the research findings. However, the qualitative method assists the author to access large information. However, qualitative approach is time consuming, and the quantitative method does not allow author to immense in the phenomena.
¶ … tilted "Terrorism and the Shape of Things to Come. Terrorism and Political Violence." (Weinberg & EUBank, 1999), and the research paper titled "Forecasting Terrorism: Indicators and Proven Analytic Techniques" (Khalsa, 2004). Weinberg at al (1999) investigates the factors leading to political terrorism. The authors evaluate the Huntington's hypothesis on the emergence of political terrorism and compare whether the violence activities of terrorists are more inter-civilizational than the Cold war conflict. On the other hand, Khalsa, (2004) uses forecasting methodology to identify 68 indicators of terrorisms and employ the proven analytical technique to arrive at good analysis.
Methodology Adopted
Weinberg at al (1999) use the quantitative method to collect data from several sources and the data are collected on several terrorists event between 1968 and 1990. To enhance the quality of the data collected, the authors collected data from the ITERATE II and ITERATE III data sets. Moreover, the author collected data from Department of Justice on pattern of global terrorisms.
Khalsa, (2004) in his own case uses the qualitative method for data collection. In his methodological approach, the authors believe that both structured technique and the intuition could be used for the systematic process in investigating the phenomenon.
Assumption
Weinberg at al (1999) research focuses on what the terrorists cause and collects data to investigate the international terrorism events. The authors assume that the terrorists are not to formulate violence in the international political arena; however, the terrorism is a form of important international political trends. Khalsa, (2004) in his own case presents assumption that "a systematic process is the most effective way to facilitate good analysis and doing something systematically is better than prediction method" (P 1). To validate his assumption, the author carries out the investigation in phases and in systematic methods.
Benefits
Weinberg at al (1999) employ quantitative method in the methodological approach and the author derive several benefits from the methodology adopted. First the authors were able to form the large database from the data collected because 5278 data were collected and data were coded for data transformation in order to enhance statistical data analysis. Moreover, the methodology adopted assists in presenting the information in tabular and graphical forms which enhance the visual presentation of the data collected. For example, Weinberg at al (1999) presented the terrorist events between 1968 and 1997 in the tabular form and the data collected have been used to compare terrorist acts before the cold war and after the cold war. The table also presents the variables in ratios. The method assists in communicating the results efficiently to readers under severe time-shortage, with information overloaded.
Other benefit from the methodology used is that it allows the authors to manipulate data in a constructive way thereby be able to compare data, combining figures as well as examining the rate of changes in an effective and efficient method. The method allows the authors to test the data with much greater degree of precision. With the methodology adopted, the researchers are able to process the relevant data in a systematic method thereby producing extrapolations trends and other forecasts, which assist the researcher to achieve generalizability, objectivity and reliability in the data collected.
On the other hand, Khalsa, (2004) derive many benefits from the qualitative method adopted. First, the author has been able to get better understanding of the terrorist act through the systematic investigation. The strategy assists the author to access a good amount of valuable information which assists in providing a better understanding to the phenomena.
Challenges
The importantly challenges that Weinberg at al (1999) face in their methodology is the challenges in representing the important political variables in numerical form. The political terrorism is a political event and using numerical attributes to represent political variables may be challenging. Khalsa, (2004) also face some challenges in his methodology approach. The methodology adopted is time consuming and the author will need to use several criteria in arriving at the valid and reliable findings. Typically, the author use several phases to arrive at findings. First, the author defines and validates the key elements in his research procedure to arrive at intelligent solution. The process involving reviewing the raw intelligent data to determine whether the U.S. has gained or lost its capability in controlling the terrorist activities. Another process is to arrange the data in its order of priority to identify the terrorist intentions, and the next phase is to develop the key questions of the terrorists' activities and the key questions surrounding the strategy to combat the terrorist acts. Typically, the author goes through several phases in his methodology before arriving at concrete findings. Thus, the methodological approach adopted by the author is time consuming and may takes several months even years to deliver the quality findings.
You’re 87% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.