This paper examines two competing approaches to healthcare information systems: best-of-breed application solutions and integrated application systems. It outlines the practical advantages and disadvantages of each, focusing on EMR and practice management software interoperability, data entry burdens, and vendor relationships. The paper also explores the strategic objectives, key components, major challenges, and achievements of the Total Hospital Information System (THIS), drawing on examples from Malaysia's Lifetime Health Plan and broader hospital information system literature to illustrate how technology-driven healthcare integration benefits both clinicians and patients.
When selecting a healthcare information system, organizations typically face a choice between two broad approaches: best-of-breed application systems and integrated application systems. Both options carry distinct advantages and disadvantages, and the right choice depends on the specific needs, resources, and workflows of the organization in question.
With the best-of-breed approach, each software application is selected based on its inherent qualities. If the practice management and electronic medical record (EMR) systems chosen come from different vendors and need to exchange data, an interface must be built to allow that exchange. When combining EMR and practice management systems from different vendors, registration interfaces are the most common solution. This allows front-desk staff to automatically send data for new patients entering the practice to the new EMR system (Kleaveland, 2007).
However, this approach can place an additional burden on staff members. Without a seamless registration interface, staff may be required to enter patient data separately into both the practice management system and the EMR. This means that staff members must possess both the technical knowledge and the diligence to complete such tasks consistently and without error (Kleaveland, 2007).
Another issue that can arise with the best-of-breed approach is that there is not always a clear or universally accepted definition of what "best of breed" actually means. Vendors frequently claim that their products are best-of-breed, but this is not always accurate (Businessfinance, 2001). As a result, it remains the responsibility of the manager to carefully scrutinize the exact needs of the organization and the specific challenges it faces before committing to any particular solution.
Integrated systems offer their own set of benefits. Because they share a common database, when front-desk staff enter patient data into the system, that information becomes instantly available to everyone in the office — whether they are using the scheduling, billing, or EMR portion of the system (Kleaveland, 2007).
Additional practical advantages of integrated health information systems include the convenience of dealing with a single vendor and a single point of contact. There is also no need to manage the technical complexities of maintaining an interface between separate system components. Furthermore, because truly integrated systems share a common database, they enable sophisticated interactions between the EMR and practice management modules, allowing for more seamless and coordinated care delivery (Kleaveland, 2007).
The strategic objectives of the Total Hospital Information System (THIS) were straightforward: to create a more streamlined method of healthcare delivery for both clinicians and patients by leveraging new technology, software, and management philosophies. This vision encompassed greater ease in accessing healthcare for patients and a comprehensive minimization of hospital and medication errors.
Many of these values are reflected in countries such as Malaysia through initiatives like the Lifetime Health Plan (LHP). The LHP is a clear example of how streamlining healthcare can benefit all connected parties. As Li (2010) explains, "The objective of Lifetime Health Plan (LHP) was for every Malaysian citizen to have his or her own health plan, based on an all-encompassing health record of that individual. Using knowledge management tools, the application would evaluate the individual's health information periodically and generate advisories to support long-term care. It was intended to provide a personalised, proactive and prospective health plan tailored to the specific needs of the individual."
In other countries, the practical implementation of THIS ideals has taken more incremental forms, such as the computerization of medical records and improved network-to-network communication between healthcare parties for the rapid transmission of data (Kumar, 2006). These developments represent meaningful steps toward the broader goal of a fully integrated, patient-centered health information infrastructure. The Malaysia example illustrates that when the core objectives of THIS are pursued systematically — combining comprehensive data collection, knowledge management, and personalized care planning — the strategic achievements can be substantial, both for individual patients and for national health information systems as a whole.
Businessfinance. (2001). Breeding success: Finding the right solution with best-of-breed applications. Retrieved from Businessfinancemag.com: http://businessfinancemag.com/technology/breeding-success-finding-right-solution-best-breed-applications
Kleaveland, B. (2007, June 5). The tech doctor: Best-of-breed or integrated systems? Retrieved from physicianspractice.com:
Kumar, P. (2006). A study of the hospital information system. Retrieved from indmedica.com:
"Global outcomes and technology-driven healthcare improvements"
You’re 93% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.