ED Congestion: Causes, Impacts, and Long-Term Solutions
This paper examines emergency department (ED) overcrowding at a university hospital, identifying the primary causes as insufficient inpatient bed availability and inadequate nursing staff. Drawing on a three-week assessment of admission logs and medication reports, the study found that patients waited an average of 36.29 hours before transfer to inpatient beds. Grounded in Orlando's Nursing Process Theory and supported by a review of current literature, the paper evaluates short-term interventions already attempted and proposes radical long-term solutions—including physical resource expansion, manpower increases, and demand management—aimed at reducing bed-assignment-to-occupancy time to within 30 minutes for at least 60% of patients.
- Introduction and Problem Statement: ED overcrowding raises morbidity and mortality risks
- Theoretical Framework: Orlando's theory guides nursing response to overcrowding
- Literature Review: Research strategies for improving ED patient flow
- Methodology: Three-week data collection from ED and pharmacy records
- Results and Findings: 36-hour average wait traced to bed and staffing shortages
- Conclusion and Recommended Solutions: Long-term fixes needed beyond short-term interventions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its clinical problem in a real institutional data collection, lending empirical credibility to its findings and recommendations.
- It moves logically from problem identification through theoretical grounding, literature review, and methodology to concrete findings, giving it a coherent research structure.
- By contrasting short-term interventions already attempted with the long-term solutions needed, the paper demonstrates critical awareness of why surface-level fixes are insufficient for systemic problems.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a theoretical framework to contextualize a practice problem. By invoking Orlando's Nursing Process Theory, the author connects abstract nursing theory to concrete operational challenges—showing how theory can guide bedside decision-making under conditions of resource constraint and overcrowding. This technique of anchoring applied research in nursing theory is a standard expectation in healthcare quality improvement writing at the undergraduate and early graduate levels.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a standard quality-improvement report format: it opens with a problem statement and objectives, then grounds the issue in nursing theory, reviews relevant literature on patient flow strategies, describes a short observational methodology, presents findings from a three-week ED assessment, and closes with both short-term and long-term recommendations. Each section builds on the previous one, moving from theory to evidence to practice.
Introduction and Problem Statement
Prolonged or increased waiting time for patients at the Emergency Department (ED) leads to an increase in both morbidity and mortality among critically ill adult patients admitted for inpatient beds. A review of ED records at the study institution, aimed at developing a report on overcrowding, identified the main causes as the lack of available inpatient beds and the lack of nurses available to care for patients. Long-term solutions are identified and suggested.
Patients with assigned medical/surgical beds from the Emergency Department take too long to move from the ED to their inpatient beds. Prolonged boarding times at the ED increase morbidity and mortality risks among critically ill patients. The objective of this project is to decrease the time from the assignment of inpatient beds until they are occupied to within 30 minutes for 60% of patients.
Theoretical Framework
Overcrowding at the ED occurs primarily because of overwhelmed ED manpower and the sheer physical incapability created by the massive number of patients requiring or receiving care. Overcrowding, lack of ED staff, delays in transfer to assigned beds, the lack of physical beds, and untimely discharges all lead to increased boarding times at the ED.
Orlando's Nursing Process Theory lists the basic concepts for nurses in meeting patients' immediate needs. Overcrowding and delays in transfer complicate a nurse's task of assessing critical patients and addressing their basic and immediate needs. The theory helps streamline nursing tasks to focus on immediate needs until patients are moved to their destination.
Literature Review
Institutions report that 50% or more of hospital admissions go through the ED, considered the "front door" of the hospital (Harrell, 2012). Patient flow through the ED is characterized by bottlenecks, confusing communication, and the commingling of self-arriving patients and those brought in by emergency vehicles. Poorly conceived first-encounter systems, queuing problems, and poorly designed treatment areas lead to delays in treatment or management of patient records, increasing stress among patients and hospital staff alike. Poor and inefficient patient throughput leads to costly and error-prone operations and, ultimately, patient dissatisfaction. When beds are all full, a nurse conducts an initial assessment at a triage station. The emergency staff determines the priority of care, and the patient waits in the inner waiting area with family members (Harrell, 2012).
Bramwell (2012) describes three strategies that helped improve patient throughput at Good Samaritan Hospital of New York and increased hospital revenues in the process. These were the opening of a logistics center, the use of an electronic bed board, and fast-tracking ED triage. The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority (ECRI, 2010) suggests a predictive model of staffing; optimizing low-census or low-utilization times at the ED while preparing for busier periods; monitoring ED capacity in real time; an accurate and reliable triage methodology; alternative triage strategies; appointing a patient flow manager; fast-track or urgent care treatment areas; and adopting environmental ED principles.
The 2007 Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance Annual Data Survey enumerated several recognizable trends in ED data: total arrivals increase from midmorning through noon, hold steady until midnight, and then decrease; pediatric arrivals occur earlier and decrease sooner than adult arrivals; senior citizens arrive in the late afternoon and wait longer; Saturdays and Mondays are the busiest days; the busiest months are July–August and December; and the most common complaints are abdominal pain, chest pain, and orthopedic injuries (ECRI, 2010).
The University Medical Center of Tucson, Arizona, increased its hospital capacity and improved patient flow through a comprehensive approach (Enriquez et al., 2009). The hospital has since been guided by four keys to success: 100% support from and involvement by senior executives; engagement of the key participants in patient flow; perseverance; and deciding whether to implement changes independently or through a partnership with outside organizations. H&HN (2009) suggests improving patient flow through industry-wide solutions, including improved scheduling, simplified bed management, tracking of patients, staff, and assets, and improving patient perception through interactive patient care.
DeLia (2007) argues that ED trends are most heavily influenced by the inaccessibility of primary and specialized care outside the hospital. Rationalizing ED output is most often hampered by reimbursement disparity between elective surgeries and other hospital services. Critical areas of concern include the inability to track patients through the entire hospital in real time, coordinating discharge schedules with incoming inpatients, and coordinating the use of resources between elective surgery and ED patients. DeLia (2007) recommends that public policy include regular surveillance of hospital patient flow.
Hospital strategies that have succeeded in improving patient flow share common beliefs: that ED crowding is an issue for the entire hospital, not just the ED in isolation; that multi-disciplinary, hospital-wide teams are necessary to implement and monitor desired change; that a champion must be identified to symbolize and drive the change; that senior leaders must clearly and consistently emphasize improving patient flow as a priority; that formal improvement methods must be learned and used by all staff; that hospitals must be able to collect more useful patient flow data; and that transparency should be an organizational value (NAPHHS, 2005).
Conclusion and Recommended Solutions
The chronic issues identified in this assessment require radical long-term solutions, including the frank increase of physical resources and manpower and demand management. These measures are deemed sufficient to decrease wait time from bed assignment to occupancy to within 30 minutes for 60% or more of patients. Short-term fixes have provided some relief, but systemic and sustained improvement at the ED requires a comprehensive commitment to expanding capacity and rationalizing patient flow at the institutional level.
Bibliography
Bramwell, J. (2012). Going with the flow: Three strategies help improve throughput. HFMA: Healthcare Financial Management Association. Retrieved September 22, 2012, from
DeLia, D. (2007). Hospital capacity, patient flow and emergency department use in New Jersey. Institute for Health, Rutgers Center for State Health Policy. Retrieved September 22, 2012, from
ECRI (2010). Managing patient access and flow in the emergency department to improve patient safety. The Emergency Department Institute and ISMP: Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. Retrieved September 22, 2012, from )/Pages/123.aspx
Enriquez, M., et al. (2009). Increasing hospital capacity using existing resources to improve patient flow management. Nurse Leader: Mosby, Inc. Retrieved September 22, 2012, from
H&HN (2007). Improving patient flow, patient satisfaction and patient safety. Health Forum: Hospitals & Health Networks. Retrieved September 22, 2012, from
Harrell, J. (2012). In and out of the emergency room: Streamlined design of patient flow. Asian Hospital and Healthcare Management: Ochre Media. Retrieved September 22, 2012, from
NAPHHS (2005). Perfecting patient flow. Urgent Matters: National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems. Retrieved September 22, 2012, from
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.