This paper examines a case study involving Senior Public Health Nurse Comrie, whose job transfer was handled through poor communication and without her meaningful input, ultimately leading to significant professional frustration. The paper identifies key failures in interpersonal effectiveness, human resource management, and staff welfare as defined by established nursing leadership competency models — including the Nursing Leadership Institute Competency Model and the Healthcare Leadership Alliance Competency Directory. Drawing on research by scholars such as Brown, Dubnicki and Sloan, Snow, Lin et al., and Vestal, the paper recommends targeted education and training for nursing supervisors to prevent similar communication breakdowns and to build a more respectful, collaborative management culture.
The facts of this case involve a transfer for Senior Public Health Nurse Comrie that was initially communicated to her indirectly and informally, through an individual other than her supervisor with decision-making authority. Six weeks before Nurse Comrie was due to go on vacation, the Superintendent of Public Health Nurses mentioned that a recommendation for her transfer was being made. The new position would move Nurse Comrie from her role overseeing a rural health district to serve as Deputy Superintendent for Public Health Nurses at the Head Office. While Nurse Comrie had been fulfilling the duties of a Grade III classification nurse, she had received confirmation of that position only a few weeks before news of the new appointment was raised.
Nurse Comrie did not wish to take the new post for several reasons: (1) she did not want to leave her clinical responsibilities for purely administrative duties; (2) she would have to drive an additional 40 miles each day with no compensation; and (3) she was concerned about the wear and tear on her already aging automobile, as the compensation allowance provided was insufficient.
The method used to formally notify Nurse Comrie of her transfer was a letter advising her that she was to be reassigned. Upon reporting to the Head Office, Nurse Comrie approached the Acting Superintendent and protested both the manner in which the transfer had been communicated and the apparent lack of concern for her feelings. The Acting Superintendent responded by telling Nurse Comrie that there was nothing she could do about the situation.
Nurse Comrie then contacted Senior Medical Officer Dr. Marjorie Bell by telephone and requested a meeting. Dr. Bell promised to meet with Nurse Comrie and the Acting Superintendent as soon as possible to find a solution. Later that week, the Senior Medical Officer visited the Head Office while Nurse Comrie was managing a food poisoning crisis in town. As Dr. Bell was in a hurry to keep an appointment with the Minister of Health, she spoke hurriedly with the Acting Superintendent about Nurse Comrie's situation. The two agreed that, given the circumstances, it would be better for Nurse Comrie to return to her original position and that Nurse Johnson, a PHN Grade II, should be brought in to act as PHN Grade III.
When Nurse Comrie finished her duties and went to the Acting Superintendent's office, she was greeted with the so-called "good news." "Nurse," Mrs. Atkinson said cheerily, "you'll be pleased to hear that Doctor Brown says you can go back to your district and we will bring Nurse Johnson in as of Monday, the 6th." At that point, Nurse Comrie became so angry that she could hardly speak. She stormed out of the office, collected her belongings, got into her car, and drove away.
The scenario described above clearly contains issues relating to communication and staff welfare. Specifically, the manner in which Senior Public Health Nurse Comrie was informed of her transfer — and then the manner in which she was informed of her return to her original position — left much to be desired. This haphazard style of management and communication, which left Nurse Comrie uncertain about her assignment, position, and duties at every turn, understandably resulted in significant frustration and anger.
Nursing staff — or staff in any profession — cannot help but feel that their welfare has been given little consideration when they are notified of major changes in a secondhand and informal manner such as demonstrated here. Clear, direct communication is the most desirable approach when conveying changes in position or assignment to nursing staff, and this standard was not met in the present case.
The hidden issues in this scenario are notable. Nurse Comrie was not, in fact, directly contesting her appointment to the new position. Rather, her protests centered on the lack of consideration for the additional expenses she would incur and the wear and tear on her automobile. It is possible — and even likely, given the description provided — that Nurse Comrie would have accepted the appointment to the new assignment if her supervisors had better communicated the details and discussed them with her in advance.
"Competency models defining effective nurse manager behaviors"
"Training gaps identified; collaborative communication recommended"
"HLA Competency Directory as leadership development framework"
You’re 23% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.