This paper critically evaluates two significant areas of inconsistency in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP): the treatment of operating leases and research and development (R&D) expenses. Under current rules, operating leases remain off the balance sheet despite representing real financial obligations, obscuring a firm's true liabilities from investors. Similarly, U.S. standards require immediate expensing of all R&D costs, whereas international standards permit amortization of development-phase expenditures that yield future economic benefits. The paper argues that both treatments prioritize conceptual distinctions over functional realities, distorting financial statements. It recommends that GAAP align with international accounting standards to improve consistency, transparency, and investor decision-making.
The current treatment of leases differentiates between two types: the finance lease and the operating lease. Finance leases transfer the entire set of risks and rewards of an asset to the entity; all others are considered operating leases. Only finance leases are included on the balance sheet, meaning that the majority of leases exist off the balance sheet (Lister, 2009). Yet these leases remain an obligation for firms, subject to the specific terms of the lease.
The treatment of operating leases is considered by many to be incongruent with fundamental accounting principles. The intent of financial reporting is that public companies produce statements that allow readers to understand a company's true financial situation. There is concern that operating leases obfuscate the company's actual position with respect to its liabilities. An operating lease grants only the right to use the asset (Damodar, n.d.). As such, the company does not assume the liabilities associated with the asset. However, the lease does represent a liability insomuch as the lessee is obligated to make payments on it. These payments are treated as operating expenses.
The problem this creates is that many firms carry a high level of fixed expenses that are contractual obligations. Investors have little way of determining the extent to which a company's operating expenses are fixed obligations. This makes it difficult for investors to assess the firm's short-term liquidity situation and long-term debt load.
It seems reasonable that operating leases represent an area in need of improvement. International accounting bodies are discussing the possibility of placing operating leases on the balance sheet (Lister, 2009). This would give investors a clearer picture of a firm's liquidity and debt situation. While the current treatment is controversial, changes would also be controversial. Companies would have to examine their use of leases, and in some cases may need to renegotiate their debt if the resulting increase in recorded liabilities causes them to violate debt covenants (Lister, 2009). Leverage ratios would weaken for a number of companies as well, which would complicate comparisons between current and historical financial statements.
While the treatment of leases is problematic, it is no more so than the treatment of research and development expenses. The current treatment of R&D under U.S. standards holds that R&D activities are expensed as they are incurred. This approach is problematic because, for many firms, research and development is part of a multi-year product development cycle. The expenditure therefore represents an investment with a future payoff. International standards split the research and development phases: research costs are expensed, but once a product enters the development phase — where there are expected future economic payoffs — the development costs may be amortized against those future returns (Oliver, 2003).
"R&D as functional asset deserving capitalization"
"Unified reform argument for both accounting issues"
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.