This paper presents a case study analysis of Providence Healthcare, examining the organization's most pressing risks and proposing targeted risk management strategies to address them. Drawing on the "Boldly Go" case study, the paper identifies financial instability, poor patient flow, and resistance to change as the three most critical risks. It evaluates management approaches including funding diversification, cost optimization, Lean Six Sigma process improvement, and structured change management models such as Kotter's 8-Step framework. The paper also considers how a risk manager and the organizational culture would likely respond to these proposals, ultimately arguing that Providence Healthcare can achieve greater stability and improved patient care through disciplined, stakeholder-inclusive risk management.
Providence Healthcare is exposed to a number of risks that could negatively affect its ability to deliver consistent, quality care to its patients. These risks range from financial instability to the need for improved patient flow and resistance to change. Addressing these risks requires a comprehensive risk management approach. This paper discusses these risks, how a risk management approach should be developed to address them, and what the best ways to manage them are likely to be.
The Providence Healthcare facility faces a number of risks. These include financial instability, potential cutbacks and layoffs, poor patient flow, poor productivity, resistance to change, lack of stakeholder engagement, lack of sustainable positive change, a possible over-reliance on Walsh as a leader, and the risk of failing to meet strategic goals (Weil & Reddin, 2017). For instance, in 2008, the global financial crisis along with growing financial pressure in Ontario's healthcare sector contributed to a significant deficit that threatened the organization's operations and put its pension plans at risk. This situation occurred at a time when regulators expected healthcare organizations to reduce costs while continuing to provide services, making the situation highly unstable.
As a result, the financial instability could lead to service cutbacks, staff layoffs, and the closure of patient care units if the organization followed a traditional approach to managing financial pressures. On top of this, there was a growing realization among healthcare leaders that Ontario's model of patient flow and care needed to be radically improved, with shorter wait times, higher quality and standards of care, smoother hand-offs, and better use of limited resources (Weil & Reddin, 2017).
Added to all this was the problem that hospitals were being held accountable for performance and productivity and were expected to balance their budgets. Unfortunately, the older the organization, the slower it tends to be to change. The multi-year transformation project redesigned 32 processes, changed staffing and infrastructure, affected multiple stakeholders both inside and outside Providence, and subjected those stakeholders to constant change. Providence Healthcare's stakeholders included the board of directors, senior management, employees, physicians, volunteers, students, patients, residents, clients and their families, donors, union members, and various healthcare partners. Managing the expectations and needs of these diverse stakeholders represented a substantial risk.
Leadership also needed to sustain the momentum of positive change and build for the future. However, the success of the transformation depended heavily on the leadership of Josie Walsh, the president and CEO. She succeeded, but any changes in leadership could pose a risk to the continuity and success of the transformation. In addition, the strategic plan, Time to Shine, set high goals including redeveloping the hospital's rehabilitation inpatient units, expanding outpatient programs and services, and providing excellence in patient care — all of which carried the risk of falling short.
The three most important risks selected for management are financial instability, the need for improved patient flow, and resistance to change.
The management strategy to address this risk starts with seeking additional funding sources — such as grants, donations, and partnerships — to supplement the facility's income and reduce dependence on a single source of funding. Second, the organization should implement cost-saving measures, such as energy efficiency plans, waste reduction initiatives, and optimized staff scheduling. Third, the organization should develop a financial risk management system to identify, assess, and manage all financial risks, which could include regular financial audits and stress testing.
The strategy here would begin with using Lean Six Sigma to streamline processes, reduce waste, and improve efficiency in patient flow. This would allow the organization to define the problem, collect and analyze data, and make adjustments accordingly. Next, the organization should incorporate new technology such as telehealth and telemedicine to improve care coordination and patient satisfaction. Finally, staff should be trained on new procedures and protocols to ensure they are equipped to manage improved patient flow effectively.
Here, the organization should use a structured change management process such as Kotter's 8-Step model to guide the organization through change. This should include clear communication about what is changing, why it is necessary, and how it will benefit everyone. Central to this effort is involving all stakeholders in the change process through regular updates, feedback sessions, and opportunities for stakeholders to voice their own ideas. Training and support for staff should also be provided to help them adapt to new changes and overcome resistance.
"Funding diversification and cost optimization strategies detailed"
"How risk managers and organizational culture view proposed strategies"
Ani, N. C., & Ugwuanyi, U. B. (2023). Diversified income sources and wealth of shareholders of insurance firms in Nigeria. Global Journal of Finance and Business Review, ISSN 1694, 450X.
Ellram, L. M., & Tate, W. L. (2021). Cost avoidance: Not everything that counts is counted. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(4), 406–427.
Weil, M., & Reddin, C. P. (2017). Boldly go: Character drives leadership at Providence Healthcare. In Leadership in practice (pp. 188–202). Routledge.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.